Bafowaa Bridget Yeboah, Leschewski Andrea M
Department of Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
Ness School of Management and Economics, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota.
AJPM Focus. 2024 Jul 25;3(5):100265. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100265. eCollection 2024 Oct.
COVID-19 relief payments and programs may have contributed to the shift in food expenditures from food away from home to food at home during the pandemic. This shift has public health implications given the differences in the nutritional quality between food at home and food away from home. The objective of this study is to examine the association between COVID-19 relief and household food at home and food away from home expenditure shares. Economic Impact Payments, Pandemic-Electronic Benefits Transfer, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and charitable food receipt are considered.
Food expenditure and COVID-19 relief data for 265,443 households were obtained from Phase 3.1 (April 28 to July 5, 2021) of the Household Pulse Survey. Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimators were employed in 2023 to analyze the association between COVID-19 relief and household food at home and food away from home expenditure shares.
Pandemic-Electronic Benefits Transfer receipt was associated with households allocating 3% less of food expenditures to food at home and 9% more to food away from home. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and charitable food receipt were associated with spending 8% and 3% more of food expenditures on food at home and 22% and 9% less on food away from home, respectively. Recent Economic Impact Payment receipt was associated with reduced food at home and increased food away from home expenditure shares among households with low-income and/or a Black respondent.
Study results indicate that COVID-19 relief contributed to changing food expenditure patterns during the pandemic. Of note, Pandemic-Electronic Benefits Transfer and Economic Impact Payment receipt were associated with spending a greater share of food dollars on food away from home. Nutritional implications of COVID-19 relief warrant further investigation and should be carefully considered in the design of future nutrition assistance emergency relief.
新冠疫情救济款项和计划可能导致了疫情期间食品支出从外出就餐食品转向居家食品的转变。鉴于居家食品和外出就餐食品在营养质量上存在差异,这种转变具有公共卫生影响。本研究的目的是检验新冠疫情救济与家庭居家食品和外出就餐食品支出份额之间的关联。研究考虑了经济影响付款、疫情电子福利转账、补充营养援助计划和慈善食品接收情况。
从家庭脉搏调查的第3.1阶段(2021年4月28日至7月5日)获取了265443户家庭的食品支出和新冠疫情救济数据。2023年采用泊松伪最大似然估计量来分析新冠疫情救济与家庭居家食品和外出就餐食品支出份额之间的关联。
收到疫情电子福利转账与家庭将食品支出中用于居家食品的比例减少3%、用于外出就餐食品的比例增加9%有关。补充营养援助计划和慈善食品接收分别与将食品支出中8%和3%更多地用于居家食品、22%和9%更少地用于外出就餐食品有关。近期收到经济影响付款与低收入和/或有黑人受访者的家庭中居家食品支出减少、外出就餐食品支出份额增加有关。
研究结果表明,新冠疫情救济导致了疫情期间食品支出模式的变化。值得注意的是,收到疫情电子福利转账和经济影响付款与将更多食品支出用于外出就餐食品有关。新冠疫情救济的营养影响值得进一步调查,并且在未来营养援助紧急救济的设计中应仔细考虑。