College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot, 010018, China.
College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot, 010018, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Integrated Management of Water Resources and Water Environment in the Inner Mongolia Reaches of the Yellow River, Hohhot, 010018, China; Research and Development of Efficient Water-saving Technology and Equipment and Research Engineering Center of Soil and Water Environment Effect in Arid Area of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot, 010018, China.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122456. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122456. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
Traditional nitrogen fertilizers (TNF), such as urea, percolate easily in arid fields, posing low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and a high non-point pollution risk. Controlled-release fertilizers (CRF) exhibit significantly lower deep seepage, rendering it a favorable choice in arid fields due to its ability to enhance NUE through slow-release mechanisms. However, current models do not fully account for the soil nitrogen dynamics and crop interactions under controlled-release conditions, and lack quantification. This study improved the APSIM model by adjustment the urea hydrolysis rate to assess the impact of CRF and TNF applications on soil health, crop growth, and water quality. Calibration and validation were conducted through experiments in the Hetao Irrigation District of China from 2019 to 2020, with different nitrogen application rates (135, 225, and 315 kg/ha). The model accurately simulated soil NO-N concentration (SNC), cumulative NO-N leaching (CNL), nitrogen uptake (NU), and sunflower yield. During the validation process, R and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values were both above 0.75. Results indicated that the average SNC, NU, and yield under CRF application were significantly higher than those under TNF application, with increases of 38.62%, 44.92%, and 18.38%, respectively. Notably, the proportion of soil nitrogen available (P), a novel metric proposed in this study, was 159.50% higher in the 0-40 cm soil layer with CRF compared to TNF. Additionally, CNL and NO-N leaching loss rate (NLLR) decreased by 25.76% and 25.77%, respectively. Scenario simulations indicated that the optimal fertilization strategy for this region is to use 180-193.5 kg/ha of CRF with a release period of 80-85.5 d to balance agricultural productivity and ecological protection. This study confirms the significant advantages of CRF in enhancing yield, improving nitrogen management, and promoting environmental sustainability, providing a scientific basis for CRF management strategies and supporting the shift towards more efficient and environmentally friendly agricultural practices.
传统氮肥(TNF),如尿素,在干旱地区很容易渗透,导致氮素利用率(NUE)低和非点源污染风险高。控释肥(CRF)的深层渗漏明显较低,由于其通过缓慢释放机制提高 NUE 的能力,因此在干旱地区是一个很好的选择。然而,目前的模型并没有充分考虑控释条件下的土壤氮动态和作物相互作用,并且缺乏量化。本研究通过调整尿素水解率来改进 APSIM 模型,以评估 CRF 和 TNF 应用对土壤健康、作物生长和水质的影响。通过 2019 年至 2020 年在中国河套灌区的实验进行了校准和验证,使用了不同的氮施用量(135、225 和 315 kg/ha)。该模型准确模拟了土壤硝态氮浓度(SNC)、累积硝态氮淋失(CNL)、氮吸收(NU)和向日葵产量。在验证过程中,R 和纳什-苏特克里夫效率(NSE)的值均高于 0.75。结果表明,控释肥处理下的平均 SNC、NU 和产量均显著高于 TNF 处理,分别增加了 38.62%、44.92%和 18.38%。值得注意的是,在 0-40 cm 土壤层中,控释肥处理下的土壤氮有效比例(P)比 TNF 处理高 159.50%。此外,CNL 和硝态氮淋失率(NLLR)分别降低了 25.76%和 25.77%。情景模拟表明,该地区的最佳施肥策略是使用 180-193.5 kg/ha 的控释肥,释放期为 80-85.5 d,以平衡农业生产力和生态保护。本研究证实了控释肥在提高产量、改善氮素管理和促进环境可持续性方面的显著优势,为控释肥管理策略提供了科学依据,并支持向更高效和环境友好的农业实践转变。