Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Cancer Awareness, Screening and Diagnostic Pathways Research Group (CASP), Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;50(11):1778-1790. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07623-0. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
The importance and effectiveness of palliative care (PC) in intensive care units (ICU) are known. Less is known about the implementation and integration of ICU-based PC interventions. This systematic review aims to use a modified implementation research logic model (IRLM) to identify, map, and synthesise evidence on implementation of ICU-PC (primary and/or specialist) interventions.
This systematic review used an adapted Smith's IRLM to understand relationships between implementation factors-determinants (barriers and facilitators), strategies, and mechanisms-and report intervention characteristics and outcomes. Searches up to 2nd December 2023, of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, combined PC, intensive care, and implementation terms.
84 studies (8 process evaluations, 76 effectiveness studies) were included. Published evidence on ICU-PC interventions is substantial, but reporting on implementation factors is variable and often lacking, especially for patient and family-related determinants and for all aspects of mechanisms. Main facilitators for implementation are adequate resources and collaboration between PC and ICU teams. Main barriers to implementation are lack of resources, negative perceptions of PC, and high ICU acuity. Implementation strategies include auditing resources, building stakeholder collaboratives, creating adaptable interventions, utilising champions, and supporting education. Mechanisms most commonly worked by facilitating collaborative working.
This review provides recommendations for ICUs when designing (stakeholder involvement, ICU-PC collaboration, assessment of culture and resources); implementing (targeted and adapted strategies, champions, and education); and evaluating/reporting (collect effectiveness and implementation data, including mechanisms) ICU-PC interventions. Use of implementation structures and patient/family involvement are both needed and important to be included.
在重症监护病房(ICU)中,姑息治疗(PC)的重要性和有效性是众所周知的。然而,关于基于 ICU 的 PC 干预措施的实施和整合知之甚少。本系统评价旨在使用改良的实施研究逻辑模型(IRLM)来确定、映射和综合基于 ICU 的 PC(初级和/或专科)干预措施的实施证据。
本系统评价使用改良的 Smith IRLM 来理解实施因素-决定因素(障碍和促进因素)、策略和机制之间的关系,并报告干预措施的特征和结果。截至 2023 年 12 月 2 日,对 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 进行了搜索,结合了 PC、重症监护和实施术语。
纳入了 84 项研究(8 项过程评估,76 项有效性研究)。关于 ICU-PC 干预措施的已发表证据很多,但实施因素的报告具有变异性且经常缺乏,尤其是关于患者和家庭相关决定因素以及机制的所有方面。实施的主要促进因素是 PC 和 ICU 团队之间有足够的资源和协作。实施的主要障碍是资源不足、对 PC 的负面看法以及 ICU 病情严重。实施策略包括审计资源、建立利益相关者协作、创建适应性干预措施、利用拥护者以及支持教育。最常见的机制是促进协作工作。
本综述为 ICU 设计(利益相关者参与、PC 和 ICU 合作、评估文化和资源)、实施(有针对性和适应性的策略、拥护者和教育)以及评估/报告(收集有效性和实施数据,包括机制)时提供了建议 ICU-PC 干预措施。需要并重要的是,要同时使用实施结构和患者/家庭的参与。