Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Department of Neurology, Changchun Central Hospital, Changchun, China.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Nov;26(11):5376-5389. doi: 10.1111/dom.15901. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are used to maintain glycaemic control as well as for their beneficial cardiovascular and renal effects in diabetes patients. However, increased risk of amputation and peripheral artery disease (PAD) have been observed with the use of some SGLT-2is. A meta-analysis was conducted to understand the effect of SGLT-2is on amputation and PAD events using data from randomized controlled trials (RCT).
A systematic literature review was conducted using Medline and Central databases for RCTs that involved the administration of SGLT-2is versus placebo/active comparators to diabetic patients. The primary outcome was amputation events and PAD. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio, and subgroup analyses was performed.
A total of 51 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis with data from 97 589 patients. Meta-analysis of the data showed that there was a significant increase in PAD risk (p = 0.04) but no significant increase in amputation risk with SGLT-2i use versus placebo/active comparators (p = 0.43). Subgroup analyses demonstrated no significant difference between SGLT-2i type, duration of treatment or patient risk factors on amputation or PAD incidence. However, length of drug treatment (> 100 weeks) was associated with a significant increase in both PAD and amputation risks in the SGLT-2i treatment groups.
The results of the meta-analysis showed no significant association between SGLT-2i use and PAD and amputation risks in diabetic patients when used for shorter treatment durations.
钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT-2is)用于控制血糖,对糖尿病患者具有有益的心血管和肾脏作用。然而,一些 SGLT-2is 的使用增加了截肢和外周动脉疾病(PAD)的风险。进行了一项荟萃分析,以了解 SGLT-2is 对截肢和 PAD 事件的影响,使用来自随机对照试验(RCT)的数据。
使用 Medline 和中央数据库进行系统文献综述,以检索涉及 SGLT-2is 与安慰剂/活性对照比较用于糖尿病患者的 RCT。主要结果是截肢事件和 PAD。使用随机效应模型计算汇总优势比,并进行亚组分析。
共有 51 项 RCT 纳入荟萃分析,共有 97589 名患者的数据。数据分析表明,与安慰剂/活性对照相比,SGLT-2i 治疗与 PAD 风险显著增加(p=0.04),但截肢风险无显著增加(p=0.43)。亚组分析表明,SGLT-2i 类型、治疗持续时间或患者危险因素对截肢或 PAD 发生率没有显著差异。然而,药物治疗时间(>100 周)与 SGLT-2i 治疗组的 PAD 和截肢风险显著增加有关。
荟萃分析结果表明,在较短的治疗持续时间内,SGLT-2i 的使用与糖尿病患者的 PAD 和截肢风险之间没有显著关联。