Research Group of Humanities and Qualitative Research in Health Science of Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (Hum&QRinHS), Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
Research Group of Nursing in Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;12:1351754. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1351754. eCollection 2024.
To describe the perspectives of a group of COPD patients during the first outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and narrate the emotions and polarity (acceptance-rejection) regarding living with COPD during the pandemic.
DESIGN/METHODS: We used a novel application of lemmatization and thematic analysis of participants' narratives. A study was carried out with eight patients with moderate-severe-very severe COPD during the first outbreak of COVID-19 using purposive sampling. In-depth interviews and field notes from the researchers were used to collect data. A statistical content analysis (lemmatization) of the patients' narratives was performed. Additionally, inductive thematic analysis was used to identify emerging themes. This study was conducted following the guidelines of Consolidated Criteria/Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles articulated in the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. Participants provided verbal informed consent prior to their inclusion as previously described.
The average age of our sample was 65 years, and 75% of the patients suffered from moderate COPD, 12.5% from severe COPD, and 12.5% from very severe COPD according to GOLD criteria. The lemmatized and sentiment analysis showed a predominance of positive emotions, and the polarity of the interviews indicated a very slight positive trend towards acceptance of the experience lived during the pandemic. Additionally, three main themes were identified: (1) Confinement and restriction measures, (2) COVID-19 and protective measures, and (3) Clinical care during the first outbreak of the pandemic.
Patients experienced confinement with a feeling of security and protection. They strictly respect social distancing. They used masks, but these caused them to feel short of breath and fatigue, especially FFP2 masks. Half of the patients rejected the possibility of being vaccinated. Finally, they were very satisfied with the clinical care they received in the COPD unit of their hospital. Our results show that COPD patients have not experienced a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
描述一组 COPD 患者在 COVID-19 大流行首次爆发期间的观点,并叙述他们在大流行期间与 COPD 共存的情绪和极性(接受-拒绝)。
方法/设计:我们使用了一种对参与者叙述进行词干化和主题分析的新应用。在 COVID-19 首次爆发期间,我们使用目的抽样对 8 名中重度-极重度 COPD 患者进行了研究。使用深入访谈和研究人员的现场记录收集数据。对患者叙述进行了统计学内容分析(词干化)。此外,还使用了归纳主题分析来识别新出现的主题。本研究遵循了定性研究报告的综合标准/规范指南。本研究符合 WMA 赫尔辛基宣言中阐述的原则。正如前面所描述的,在将参与者纳入研究之前,他们提供了口头知情同意。
我们样本的平均年龄为 65 岁,根据 GOLD 标准,75%的患者患有中度 COPD,12.5%患有重度 COPD,12.5%患有极重度 COPD。词干化和情感分析显示出积极情绪占主导地位,访谈的极性表明,对大流行期间所经历的体验存在轻微的积极接受趋势。此外,确定了三个主要主题:(1)隔离和限制措施,(2)COVID-19 和保护措施,(3)大流行首次爆发期间的临床护理。
患者经历了隔离,感到安全和受保护。他们严格遵守社交距离。他们使用口罩,但这会导致他们感到呼吸急促和疲劳,尤其是 FFP2 口罩。一半的患者拒绝接种疫苗的可能性。最后,他们对在他们医院的 COPD 病房接受的临床护理非常满意。我们的结果表明,COPD 患者没有经历 COVID-19 大流行的负面影响。