• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架内再狭窄的风险预测模型:一项系统评价

Risk prediction model for in-stent restenosis following PCI: a systematic review.

作者信息

Xiang Qin, Xiong Xiao-Yun, Liu Si, Zhang Mei-Jun, Li Ying-Jie, Wang Hui-Wen, Wu Rui, Chen Lu

机构信息

Department of Nursing, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

School of Nursing, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 29;11:1445076. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1445076. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1445076
PMID:39267809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11390508/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The morbidity and mortality rates of coronary heart disease are significant, with PCI being the primary treatment. The high incidence of ISR following PCI poses a challenge to its effectiveness. Currently, there are numerous studies on ISR risk prediction models after PCI, but the quality varies and there is still a lack of systematic evaluation and analysis.

METHODS

To systematically retrieve and evaluate the risk prediction models for ISR after PCI. A comprehensive search was conducted across 9 databases from inception to March 1, 2024. The screening of literature and extraction of data were independently carried out by two investigators, utilizing the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modeling studies (CHARMS). Additionally, the risk of bias and applicability were evaluated using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies with 29 models were included, with a sample size of 175-10,004 cases, and the incidence of outcome events was 5.79%-58.86%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.530-0.953. The top 5 predictors with high frequency were diabetes, number of diseased vessels, age, LDL-C and stent diameter. Bias risk assessment into the research of the risk of higher bias the applicability of the four study better.

DISCUSSION

The overall risk of bias in the current ISR risk prediction model post-PCI is deemed high. Moving forward, it is imperative to enhance study design and specify the reporting process, optimize and validate the model, and enhance its performance.

摘要

引言

冠心病的发病率和死亡率很高,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是主要治疗方法。PCI术后支架内再狭窄(ISR)的高发生率对其有效性构成挑战。目前,关于PCI术后ISR风险预测模型的研究众多,但质量参差不齐,仍缺乏系统的评估与分析。

方法

系统检索和评估PCI术后ISR的风险预测模型。对9个数据库从建库至2024年3月1日进行全面检索。由两名研究人员独立进行文献筛选和数据提取,使用预测建模研究系统评价的关键评估和数据提取清单(CHARMS)。此外,使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚风险和适用性。

结果

共纳入17项研究中的29个模型,样本量为175 - 10004例,结局事件发生率为5.79% - 58.86%。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.530 - 0.953。高频出现的前5个预测因素为糖尿病、病变血管数、年龄、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和支架直径。偏倚风险评估显示,四项研究的偏倚风险较高,适用性较好。

讨论

目前PCI术后ISR风险预测模型的总体偏倚风险被认为较高。未来,必须加强研究设计并明确报告流程,优化和验证模型,并提高其性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/11390508/6b58a922de1c/fcvm-11-1445076-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/11390508/6b58a922de1c/fcvm-11-1445076-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db2/11390508/6b58a922de1c/fcvm-11-1445076-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk prediction model for in-stent restenosis following PCI: a systematic review.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架内再狭窄的风险预测模型:一项系统评价
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 29;11:1445076. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1445076. eCollection 2024.
2
Risk factors of in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus after percutaneous coronary intervention: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后糖尿病患者支架内再狭窄的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 16;100(15):e25484. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025484.
3
Critical appraisal and assessment of bias among studies evaluating risk prediction models for in-hospital and 30-day mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review.系统评价:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院和 30 天死亡率风险预测模型评估的偏倚的评价和评估:一项系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 1;14(6):e085930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085930.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Prediction models for amputation after diabetic foot: systematic review and critical appraisal.糖尿病足截肢的预测模型:系统评价与批判性评估
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Jun 10;16(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01360-6.
6
Risk prediction models for disability in older adults: a systematic review and critical appraisal.老年人残疾风险预测模型:系统评价与批判性评估。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05409-z.
7
A prediction model based on platelet parameters, lipid levels, and angiographic characteristics to predict in-stent restenosis in coronary artery disease patients implanted with drug-eluting stents.基于血小板参数、血脂水平和血管造影特征的预测模型,预测冠心病患者药物洗脱支架置入后支架内再狭窄。
Lipids Health Dis. 2021 Sep 29;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01553-2.
8
Risk investigation of in-stent restenosis after initial implantation of intracoronary drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary heart disease.冠心病患者冠状动脉药物洗脱支架初次植入后支架内再狭窄的风险调查
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 10;10:1117915. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1117915. eCollection 2023.
9
Risk-prediction models for intravenous immunoglobulin resistance in Kawasaki disease: Risk-of-Bias Assessment using PROBAST.川崎病静脉注射免疫球蛋白抵抗风险预测模型:使用 PROBAST 进行风险评估。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Sep;94(3):1125-1135. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02558-6. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
10
Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in elderly patients with fragility hip fracture: A systematic review and critical appraisal.老年脆性髋部骨折患者术后谵妄的风险预测模型:系统评价和批判性评估。
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2024 Feb;52:101077. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101077. Epub 2023 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
In-stent restenosis in acute coronary syndrome-a classic and a machine learning approach.急性冠状动脉综合征中的支架内再狭窄——经典方法与机器学习方法
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 22;10:1270986. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1270986. eCollection 2023.
2
Risk prediction models for cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review.血液透析患者心血管事件风险预测模型:系统评价。
Semin Dial. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):101-109. doi: 10.1111/sdi.13181. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
3
Machine Learning Identifies New Predictors on Restenosis Risk after Coronary Artery Stenting in 10,004 Patients with Surveillance Angiography.
机器学习在10004例接受血管造影监测的冠状动脉支架置入术后再狭窄风险患者中识别出新的预测因素。
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):2941. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082941.
4
Derivation and validation of the ISAR score to predict the risk of repeat percutaneous coronary intervention for recurrent drug-eluting stent restenosis.ISAR 评分的推导和验证:用于预测复发性药物洗脱支架再狭窄患者再次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的风险。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Apr 3;18(16):e1328-e1338. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00860.
5
Intravascular Imaging for Guiding In-Stent Restenosis and Stent Thrombosis Therapy.血管内影像学在指导支架内再狭窄和支架内血栓形成治疗中的应用。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Nov 15;11(22):e026492. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026492. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
6
Serum glycated albumin is associated with in-stent restenosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: An observational study.血清糖化白蛋白与急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入术后支架内再狭窄的相关性:一项观察性研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 27;9:943185. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.943185. eCollection 2022.
7
Predictors of Stent Restenosis in Han and Uygur Patients with Coronary Heart Disease after PCI in the Xinjiang Region.新疆地区汉族和维吾尔族冠心病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架再狭窄的预测因素
Cardiol Res Pract. 2022 Jul 31;2022:7845108. doi: 10.1155/2022/7845108. eCollection 2022.
8
Investigation Into the Risk Factors Related to In-stent Restenosis in Elderly Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Within 2 Years After the First Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.首次药物洗脱支架植入术后2年内老年冠心病合并2型糖尿病患者支架内再狭窄相关危险因素的调查
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 20;9:837330. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.837330. eCollection 2022.
9
Random forest vs. logistic regression: Predicting angiographic in-stent restenosis after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation.随机森林与逻辑回归:预测第二代药物洗脱支架植入后血管造影内再狭窄。
PLoS One. 2022 May 23;17(5):e0268757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268757. eCollection 2022.
10
Usefulness of Platelet Distribution Width and Fibrinogen in Predicting In-stent Restenosis With Stable Angina and Type 2 Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.血小板分布宽度和纤维蛋白原在预测稳定性心绞痛合并2型糖尿病患者支架内再狭窄中的应用价值
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 21;9:710804. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.710804. eCollection 2022.