Lovero Kathryn L, Stockton Melissa A, Greene M Claire, Basaraba Cale, Khan Saida, Mabunda Dirceu, Mandlate Flavio, Gouveia Lidia, Fumo Wilza, Wall Melanie M, Duarte Cristiane S, Oquendo Maria A, Wainberg Milton L
Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Med Res Arch. 2024 Aug 31;12(8). doi: 10.18103/mra.v12i8.5294.
Globally, mental and substance use disorders are a leading cause of disease burden. In low- and middle-income countries, where there is an extreme shortage of trained mental health specialists, validated, brief screening tools for mental and substance use disorders are required for non-specialists to efficiently identify patients in need of mental health care. Mozambique, one of the poorest countries in the world, has fewer than two mental health specialists for every 100,000 people. In the present study, we evaluated a comprehensive set of seven measures for depression, anxiety, somatization, alcohol use disorder, substance use disorder, psychosis and mania, and suicide risk among N=911 Mozambican adults in general healthcare settings. All instruments demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α > 0.75). Compared to diagnoses made by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, all measures showed good criterion validity (AUC > 0.75), except the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire, which showed low sensitivity (0.58) for psychotic disorder. No substantial differences were observed in internal consistency when stratifying by gender, age, education level, primary language, facility-type, and patient status; criterion validity showed some variability when stratified by sub-population, particularly for education, primary language, and whether the participant was seeking care that day. Exploratory factor analyses indicated that the measures best differentiate categories of diagnoses (common mental disorder, severe mental disorders, substance use disorders, and suicide risk) rather than individual diagnoses, suggesting the utility of a transdiagnostic approach. Our findings support the use of these measures in Mozambique to identify common mental disorders, substance use disorders, and suicide risk, but indicate further research is needed to develop an adequate screen for severe mental disorders. Given the limited mental health specialists in this and other LMIC settings, these brief measures can support non-specialist provision of mental health services and promote closure of the treatment gap.
在全球范围内,精神和物质使用障碍是疾病负担的主要原因。在低收入和中等收入国家,训练有素的精神卫生专家极度短缺,因此需要经过验证的简短筛查工具,以便非专科医生能够有效地识别需要精神卫生护理的患者。莫桑比克是世界上最贫穷的国家之一,每10万人中精神卫生专家不到两名。在本研究中,我们评估了一套针对911名莫桑比克成年普通医疗患者的抑郁症、焦虑症、躯体化、酒精使用障碍、物质使用障碍、精神病和躁狂症以及自杀风险的七项综合测量指标。所有工具均显示出可接受的内部一致性(α>0.75)。与迷你国际神经精神病学访谈做出的诊断相比,除精神病筛查问卷对精神障碍的敏感性较低(0.58)外,所有测量指标均显示出良好的标准效度(AUC>0.75)。按性别、年龄、教育水平、主要语言、机构类型和患者状态分层时,内部一致性未观察到实质性差异;按亚人群分层时,标准效度存在一定差异,特别是在教育、主要语言以及参与者当天是否寻求护理方面。探索性因素分析表明,这些测量指标最能区分诊断类别(常见精神障碍、严重精神障碍、物质使用障碍和自杀风险),而不是个体诊断,这表明采用跨诊断方法具有实用性。我们的研究结果支持在莫桑比克使用这些测量指标来识别常见精神障碍、物质使用障碍和自杀风险,但表明需要进一步研究以开发出针对严重精神障碍的适当筛查方法。鉴于该国及其他低收入和中等收入国家精神卫生专家有限,这些简短的测量指标可以支持非专科医生提供精神卫生服务,并促进缩小治疗差距。