The Effectiveness of Leadership Interventions on Cardiologists' Performance Using Benchmarking as a Tool.

BACKGROUND

Aligned with the Health Sector Transformation Strategy of Saudi Vision 2030, the study analyzed the attitudes and behaviors of cardiologists toward change and identified factors that could either facilitate or hinder the success of leadership interventions. At our cardiac center, the cath lab department is at the forefront of operations, accounting for 80% of the procedures. Our team members may not be fully equipped with the necessary attitudes and behaviors to drive successful improvement projects. Therefore, our top priority is ensuring they remain productive and engaged throughout the process. This is especially crucial because 60% of our budget is allocated to the cath lab department.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a leadership intervention on cardiologists' performance in terms of safety, speed, and cost. The research analyzed the behavior and attitude of cardiologists towards change and encouraged progress and collaborative learning between doctors, using benchmarking as a tool. Besides, the study sought to determine the contribution of the interventions used to overall efficiency in performing interventions. This case study focuses on four main aspects of the program. First, it aims to explore an innovative approach to improving the PSCCQ cath lab for patients. Second, it assesses the collective effort of all participants involved in the program. Third, it analyzes the program results and compares them with those of international experiences. And finally, it examines the program's potential benefits for our patients.

METHODS

The study's objectives were evaluated through qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews and quantitative data analysis of three variables in the cath lab: radiation dose, time, and inventory. The reason for using mixed methods was to comprehensively understand the same concept from different angles.

RESULTS

According to the study, participants improved the safety and effectiveness of our cath lab by reducing the radiation dose and its cost. The study revealed a 52% decrease in the radiation dose for diagnostic cases and an 11% decrease for interventional cases. Similarly, the cost of the radiation dose decreased by 28% for diagnostic cases and 11% for interventional cases. During the observation, it was noted that the participants were highly engaged and willing to adapt to the situation. Some even viewed it as an opportunity for personal growth and improvement in the cath lab. However, they stressed the significance of awareness as a crucial element in improving their behavior and reinforcing it as the foundation for maintaining progress. Furthermore, the study revealed that collaborative work among the participants could have been more optimal.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that implementing innovative improvements to the cath lab was a necessary yet complex undertaking. Participants were more inclined to embrace the changes when they were easily understandable and motivating. The study recommends the appointment of a change agent, the establishment of benchmarks, and the creation of a collaborative working environment between leaders and staff. Above all, the leader should support and sponsor the change to facilitate the transition at various levels.