• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄对全球赌博问题的影响:对年轻人、中年人和老年人风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The influence of age on gambling problems worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk among younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

出版信息

J Behav Addict. 2024 Sep 13;13(3):702-715. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00051. Print 2024 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1556/2006.2024.00051
PMID:39269778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11457025/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Problem gambling (PG) represents a significant public health concern with widespread effects in various cultures and regions globally, with younger individuals and males at a particularly higher risk. This disparity is attributed to a mix of cultural, developmental, and biological influences. To date, there has not been a comprehensive examination to determine whether this risk pattern holds consistently across different jurisdictions.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA framework, identifying 21 eligible studies from 18 countries, encompassing 156,249 participants (47.6% male and 52.4% female).

RESULTS

The studies varied considerably by region (Asia: 19%, Europe: 52%, Oceania: 19%, North America: 10%), the diagnostic criteria for PG, and participation rates in gambling (ranging from 12% to 92%). Data on PG prevalence was categorised by gender and three age groups (young: 18-35, middle: 30-55, and older: 45-65). Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we found a global PG prevalence of 1.9%. Europe reported a significantly lower prevalence (1.3%) compared to North America (5.3%). Men were found to be 3.4 times more likely than women to engage in problem gambling, although the gap narrows in North America. The young demographic showed a 1.51 times higher likelihood of reporting PG compared to the middle-aged group, whereas older adults were 0.80 times less likely to report PG. Notably, age-related effects varied significantly across regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm that age and gender significantly influence PG risk across cultures, with significant heterogeneity observed across jurisdictions.

摘要

背景和目的

赌博问题(PG)是一个重大的公共卫生关注点,在全球不同文化和地区都有广泛的影响,年轻人和男性的风险尤其高。这种差异归因于文化、发展和生物因素的综合影响。迄今为止,尚未进行全面检查以确定这种风险模式是否在不同司法管辖区一致存在。

方法

我们使用 PRISMA 框架进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,从 18 个国家中确定了 21 项符合条件的研究,涵盖了 156,249 名参与者(47.6%为男性,52.4%为女性)。

结果

研究在地区(亚洲:19%,欧洲:52%,大洋洲:19%,北美:10%)、PG 的诊断标准和赌博参与率(12%至 92%)方面差异很大。PG 患病率的数据按性别和三个年龄组(年轻:18-35 岁,中年:30-55 岁,老年:45-65 岁)进行分类。使用随机效应荟萃分析,我们发现全球 PG 的患病率为 1.9%。欧洲的患病率明显较低(1.3%),而北美的患病率较高(5.3%)。男性参与赌博问题的可能性是女性的 3.4 倍,但在北美的差距缩小。年轻人群报告 PG 的可能性比中年人群高 1.51 倍,而老年人报告 PG 的可能性低 0.80 倍。值得注意的是,年龄相关的影响在不同地区差异显著。

结论

我们的研究结果证实,年龄和性别在不同文化背景下对 PG 风险有显著影响,而且在不同司法管辖区存在显著的异质性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/bafa829cd4df/jba-13-702-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/41726092ce07/jba-13-702-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/ddf64e2b6d85/jba-13-702-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/ee8117d5b821/jba-13-702-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/5c93123349f8/jba-13-702-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/0648a754d9ba/jba-13-702-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/bafa829cd4df/jba-13-702-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/41726092ce07/jba-13-702-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/ddf64e2b6d85/jba-13-702-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/ee8117d5b821/jba-13-702-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/5c93123349f8/jba-13-702-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/0648a754d9ba/jba-13-702-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2088/11457025/bafa829cd4df/jba-13-702-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of age on gambling problems worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk among younger, middle-aged, and older adults.年龄对全球赌博问题的影响:对年轻人、中年人和老年人风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Behav Addict. 2024 Sep 13;13(3):702-715. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00051. Print 2024 Oct 4.
2
A prospective follow-up study of younger and older subjects with pathological gambling.一项针对患有病态赌博的年轻和年长受试者的前瞻性随访研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Oct;256:162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.043. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Global prevalence of help-seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全球寻求问题赌博帮助的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):2972-2985. doi: 10.1111/add.15952. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Prevalence and determinants of gambling disorder among older adults: a systematic review.老年人赌博障碍的患病率及影响因素:一项系统综述
Addict Behav. 2015 Feb;41:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
6
Differences between early-onset pathological gambling and later-onset pathological gambling: data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).早发性病理性赌博与晚发性病理性赌博的差异:来自国家酒精相关情况流行病学调查(NESARC)的数据。
Addiction. 2014 May;109(5):807-13. doi: 10.1111/add.12461.
7
Sex Differences in the Global Prevalence of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis.青少年非自杀性自伤全球患病率的性别差异:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415436. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15436.
8
A comparison of young, middle-aged, and older adult treatment-seeking pathological gamblers.寻求治疗的年轻、中年和老年病态赌徒的比较。
Gerontologist. 2002 Feb;42(1):92-9. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.1.92.
9
Global statistics on addictive behaviours: 2014 status report.全球成瘾行为统计数据:2014年现状报告。
Addiction. 2015 Jun;110(6):904-19. doi: 10.1111/add.12899.
10
An analysis of problem gambling among the Finnish working-age population: a population survey.芬兰劳动年龄人口中赌博问题分析:一项人口调查。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 29;13:519. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-519.

引用本文的文献

1
From Clicks to Bets: How Social Media Engagement Influences Gambling Severity-Cross-Sectional Research.从点击到下注:社交媒体参与度如何影响赌博严重程度——横断面研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251318162. doi: 10.1177/00469580251318162.
2
Limit-setting in online gambling: a comparative policy review of European approaches.在线赌博中的限制设定:欧洲方法的比较政策回顾
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Feb 13;22(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01150-3.
3
Risk Factors of At-Risk/Problem Gambling Among Young Adult Spanish Students.西班牙青年学生中存在风险/问题赌博的风险因素

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Problem Gambling: A Meta-analysis of Recent Empirical Research (2016-2022).近年来实证研究中问题赌博的流行率:一项荟萃分析(2016-2022)。
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Sep;39(3):1027-1057. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10180-0. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
2
Prevalence and Trends in Problem Gambling in Denmark with Special Focus on Country of Origin: Results from the Danish Health and Morbidity Surveys.丹麦赌博问题的流行率和趋势,特别关注原籍国:来自丹麦健康和发病率调查的结果。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Dec;38(4):1157-1171. doi: 10.1007/s10899-021-10093-4. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
J Prev (2022). 2025 Apr;46(2):231-244. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00814-x. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Comparative Analysis of Potential Risk Factors for at-Risk Gambling, Problem Gambling and Gambling Disorder among Current Gamblers-Results of the Austrian Representative Survey 2015.当前赌徒中,处于风险的赌博、问题赌博和赌博障碍潜在风险因素的比较分析——2015年奥地利代表性调查结果
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 14;8:2188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02188. eCollection 2017.
5
A pathway linking reward circuitry, impulsive sensation-seeking and risky decision-making in young adults: identifying neural markers for new interventions.一条连接年轻人奖励回路、冲动性寻求刺激和冒险决策的通路:识别新干预措施的神经标志物。
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 18;7(4):e1096. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.60.
6
Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.早期问题赌博的风险和保护因素:纵向研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Feb;51:109-124. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
7
Problem gambling worldwide: An update and systematic review of empirical research (2000-2015).全球问题赌博:实证研究的更新与系统综述(2000 - 2015年)
J Behav Addict. 2016 Dec;5(4):592-613. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.073. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
Gambling disorders, gambling type preferences, and psychiatric comorbidity among the Thai general population: Results of the 2013 National Mental Health Survey.泰国普通人群中的赌博障碍、赌博类型偏好及精神疾病共病情况:2013年全国心理健康调查结果
J Behav Addict. 2016 Sep;5(3):410-8. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.066. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
9
Premeditation moderates the relation between sensation seeking and risky substance use among young adults.预谋调节了年轻人中感觉寻求与危险物质使用之间的关系。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;29(3):753-65. doi: 10.1037/adb0000075.
10
Risk Factors for Gambling Problems: An Analysis by Gender.赌博问题的风险因素:按性别分析
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Jun;32(2):511-34. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9548-8.