• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成本控制与医生

Cost containment and the physician.

作者信息

Angell M

出版信息

JAMA. 1985 Sep 6;254(9):1203-7.

PMID:3927017
Abstract

The rapid rise in health care costs is receiving a good deal of attention these days. Proposed responses include the deliberate rationing of expensive medical technologies, such as organ transplantation, and a redirection of our efforts toward preventive care. Although preventive care may improve our health, it cannot be assumed to reduce medical costs, since a later death may be as expensive as an earlier one. I suggest that a major and rapidly growing component of medical costs stems from the widespread application of tests and procedures when they are of no demonstrated benefit and may even be harmful. Identifying and curtailing such unnecessary medical care, rather than rationing beneficial technologies, should be the thrust of cost-containment efforts. Fee schedules should be revised so that they neither encourage nor discourage the use of tests and procedures; we should undertake systematic studies to assess technologies and practices; and we should make every effort to discourage the practice of defensive medicine. The involvement of physicians in rationing is not only premature; it is also inconsistent with our role as advocates for the health of our patients.

摘要

如今,医疗保健费用的迅速上涨备受关注。提出的应对措施包括对昂贵医疗技术(如器官移植)进行有意的配给,以及将我们的努力重新导向预防性护理。虽然预防性护理可能会改善我们的健康状况,但不能假定它会降低医疗成本,因为较晚死亡可能与较早死亡一样昂贵。我认为,医疗成本中一个主要且迅速增长的部分源于在没有证明其益处甚至可能有害时广泛应用检测和程序。确定并减少此类不必要的医疗护理,而不是对有益技术进行配给,应该是成本控制努力的重点。费用表应该修订,使其既不鼓励也不阻碍检测和程序的使用;我们应该进行系统研究以评估技术和实践;我们应该尽一切努力劝阻防御性医疗行为。医生参与配给不仅为时过早;这也与我们作为患者健康倡导者的角色不符。

相似文献

1
Cost containment and the physician.成本控制与医生
JAMA. 1985 Sep 6;254(9):1203-7.
2
Rationing of medical care and the preservation of clinical judgment.
J Fam Pract. 1980 Sep;11(3):431-3.
3
Curing America's health care system.治愈美国的医疗保健系统。
Med Law. 1991;10(6):601-8.
4
Health care technology and the inevitability of resource allocation and rationing decisions. Part I.医疗保健技术以及资源分配与配给决策的必然性。第一部分。
JAMA. 1983 Apr 15;249(15):2047-53.
5
Health care technology and the inevitability of resource allocation and rationing decisions. Part II.医疗保健技术与资源分配及配给决策的必然性。第二部分。
JAMA. 1983;249(16):2208-19.
6
Cost containment and the quality of medical care: rationing strategies in an era of constrained resources.
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1985 Summer;63(3):453-75.
7
Approaches to controlling the costs of medical care: short-range and long-range alternatives.控制医疗成本的方法:短期和长期选择。
N Engl J Med. 1978 Feb 2;298(5):249-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197802022980505.
8
Physicians' duties in an era of cost containment: advocacy or betrayal?成本控制时代医生的职责:是拥护还是背叛?
JAMA. 1999 Nov 3;282(17):1675.
9
Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs.美国医生控制医疗保健费用的观点。
JAMA. 2013 Jul 24;310(4):380-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.8278.
10
Cost constraints as a malpractice defense.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1988 Feb-Mar;18(1):5-10.

引用本文的文献

1
National emergency X-radiography utilization study guidelines versus Canadian C-Spine guidelines on trauma patients, a prospective analytical study.国家急诊 X 射线利用研究指南与加拿大创伤患者 C 脊柱指南的比较:一项前瞻性分析研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0206283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206283. eCollection 2018.
2
A cost-benefit analysis of twice-daily consultant ward rounds and clinical input on investigation and pharmacy costs in a major teaching hospital in the UK.英国一家大型教学医院每日两次的会诊病房查房以及临床投入对检查和药房成本的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 8;5(4):e007367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007367.
3
Health systems and sustainability: doctors and consumers differ on threats and solutions.
卫生系统与可持续性:医生和消费者对威胁和解决方案的看法存在分歧。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 27;6(4):e19222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019222.
4
HSOs, HMOs, and CHOs: The Continuing History of Capitation-Funded Health Care.自付额资助的医疗保健的持续历史:HSO、HMO 和 CHO。
Can Fam Physician. 1990 Aug;36:1402-6.
5
Bedside rationing by general practitioners: a postal survey in the Danish public healthcare system.全科医生的床边资源分配:丹麦公共医疗系统中的一项邮寄调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:192. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-192.
6
Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Iran: a prospective survey.渥太华踝关节规则在伊朗的验证:一项前瞻性调查。
BMC Emerg Med. 2006 Feb 16;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-6-3.
7
Physician conceptions of responsibility to individual patients and distributive justice in health care.医生对个体患者的责任观念以及医疗保健中的分配正义。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;3(1):53-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.257.
8
Using cost of infection as a tool to demonstrate a difference in prophylactic antibiotic efficacy: a prospective randomized comparison of the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.将感染成本作为一种工具来证明预防性抗生素疗效的差异:头孢曲松和头孢噻肟预防腹部手术的药物经济学效果的前瞻性随机比较。
World J Surg. 2005 Jan;29(1):18-24. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7257-z.
9
Public response to cost-quality tradeoffs in clinical decisions.公众对临床决策中成本-质量权衡的反应。
Med Decis Making. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5):369-78. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256882.
10
The doctor-patient relationship: challenges, opportunities, and strategies.医患关系:挑战、机遇与策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jan;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S26-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00267.x.