Ni Ruoning, Lenert Aleksander, Lenert Petar
The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2024 Dec;6(12):856-862. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11739. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features in patients with suspected connective tissue disease who tested positive for anti-Sm/RNP common motif antibody with or without associated anti-RNP antibody.
The titers of anti-Sm/RNP and anti-RNP antibodies were measured by the multiplex solid-phase bioassays (Bio-Rad). Clinical manifestations were compared among the three subgroups (RNP only, Sm/RNP only, and double positive for RNP and Sm/RNP). Patients were further evaluated for the diagnosis of mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using accepted classification criteria.
A total of 133 patients were included in this study. The rates of inflammatory arthritis and Raynaud phenomenon were significantly higher in patients testing positive for both anti-RNP and anti-Sm/RNP antibodies compared to anti-RNP only or anti-Sm/RNP only (69.1% vs 28.8% vs 25.0%, P < 0.0001 for arthritis and 59.5% vs 23.3% vs 37.5%, P = 0.0005 for Raynaud phenomenon). Area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.77, P < 0.0001) for anti-Sm/RNP titers and 0.65 (95% CI 0.55-0.74, P = 0.0039) for anti-RNP titers with inflammatory arthritis. AUC values were 0.67 (95% CI 0.58-0.77, P = 0.0002) for anti-Sm/RNP titers and 0.59 (95% CI 0.49-0.69, P = 0.0352) for anti-RNP titers with Raynaud phenomenon. The odds ratios for the diagnosis of MCTD and SLE were significantly higher in patients with double positivity compared to those testing solely positive for anti-RNP antibody.
Anti-Sm/RNP common motif autoreactivity when combined with anti-RNP antibody positivity identifies those patients who are closely related with certain clinical manifestations and who are associated with well-defined connective tissue disease such as MCTD or SLE.
本研究旨在评估抗Sm/RNP共同基序抗体检测呈阳性且伴有或不伴有抗RNP抗体的疑似结缔组织病患者的临床特征。
采用多重固相生物测定法(伯乐公司)检测抗Sm/RNP和抗RNP抗体的滴度。比较三个亚组(仅RNP阳性、仅Sm/RNP阳性以及RNP和Sm/RNP均为阳性)的临床表现。使用公认的分类标准对患者进行进一步评估,以诊断混合性结缔组织病(MCTD)和/或系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)。
本研究共纳入133例患者。与仅抗RNP或仅抗Sm/RNP抗体阳性的患者相比,抗RNP和抗Sm/RNP抗体均呈阳性的患者炎症性关节炎和雷诺现象的发生率显著更高(关节炎:69.1% 对28.8% 对25.0%,P<0.0001;雷诺现象:59.5% 对23.3% 对37.5%,P = 0.0005)。抗Sm/RNP滴度诊断炎症性关节炎的曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.68(95%置信区间[CI] 0.59 - 0.77,P<0.0001),抗RNP滴度的AUC值为0.65(95% CI 0.55 - 0.74,P = 0.0039)。抗Sm/RNP滴度诊断雷诺现象的AUC值为0.67(95% CI 0.58 - 0.77,P = 0.0002),抗RNP滴度的AUC值为0.59(95% CI 0.49 - 0.69,P = 0.0352)。与仅抗RNP抗体呈阳性的患者相比,双阳性患者诊断MCTD和SLE的比值比显著更高。
抗Sm/RNP共同基序自身反应性与抗RNP抗体阳性相结合,可识别出与某些临床表现密切相关且与明确的结缔组织病(如MCTD或SLE)相关的患者。