• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气味围栏对野猪的活动和家域大小没有影响。

Odor Fences Have No Effect on Wild Boar Movement and Home Range Size.

作者信息

Faltusová Monika, Ježek Miloš, Ševčík Richard, Silovský Václav, Cukor Jan

机构信息

Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic.

Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, V.V.I., Strnady 136, 252 02 Jíloviště, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;14(17):2556. doi: 10.3390/ani14172556.

DOI:10.3390/ani14172556
PMID:39272341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11393886/
Abstract

Wild boars are an opportunistic wildlife species that has successfully colonized the human-modified landscape in Europe. However, the current population boom has negative consequences, which result in a rapid increase in human-wildlife conflicts and disease transmission, including African swine fever (ASF). The increasing frequency of conflicts requires adequate solutions for these issues through various measures. Application of deterrents is a common non-lethal measure whose effects have been insufficiently verified until recently. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of odor fences, often applied as a barrier against wild boar movement. For this purpose, 18 wild boars were marked with GPS collars. After 22 days of initial monitoring, 12 sections of odor fences were installed on their home ranges. The monitored wild boars crossed the area 20.5 ± 9.2 times during the pre-installation period and 19.9 ± 8.4 times after the odor fence installation. Moreover, the average home range varied between 377.9 ± 185.0 ha before and 378.1 ± 142.2 ha after the odor fence installation. Based on GPS telemetry results, we do not support using odor repellent lines for crop protection or for limiting wild boar movement to lessen ASF outbreaks.

摘要

野猪是一种机会主义野生动物物种,已成功在欧洲人类改造的景观中繁衍。然而,当前的种群数量激增带来了负面后果,导致人类与野生动物的冲突以及疾病传播迅速增加,包括非洲猪瘟(ASF)。冲突频率的上升需要通过各种措施为这些问题找到适当的解决方案。使用威慑物是一种常见的非致命措施,但其效果直到最近才得到充分验证。因此,本研究旨在评估气味围栏(通常用作阻止野猪活动的屏障)的有效性。为此,给18头野猪佩戴了GPS项圈。在进行22天的初始监测后,在它们的活动范围内安装了12段气味围栏。在安装气味围栏之前,被监测的野猪穿越该区域的次数为20.5 ± 9.2次,安装后为19.9 ± 8.4次。此外,平均活动范围在安装气味围栏之前为377.9 ± 185.0公顷,之后为378.1 ± 142.2公顷。基于GPS遥测结果,我们不支持使用气味驱避线来保护农作物或限制野猪活动以减少非洲猪瘟的爆发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b08/11393886/66d6f2afb888/animals-14-02556-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b08/11393886/bc55d2d0d217/animals-14-02556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b08/11393886/80dcc9fb036f/animals-14-02556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b08/11393886/5f802bb81aed/animals-14-02556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b08/11393886/66d6f2afb888/animals-14-02556-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b08/11393886/bc55d2d0d217/animals-14-02556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b08/11393886/80dcc9fb036f/animals-14-02556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b08/11393886/5f802bb81aed/animals-14-02556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b08/11393886/66d6f2afb888/animals-14-02556-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Odor Fences Have No Effect on Wild Boar Movement and Home Range Size.气味围栏对野猪的活动和家域大小没有影响。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;14(17):2556. doi: 10.3390/ani14172556.
2
Assessing mammal fence crossing and local fence management in relation to classical swine fever spread in Japan.评估日本经典猪瘟传播中哺乳动物穿越围栏和当地围栏管理的关系。
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Sep;218:105980. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105980. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
Effects of habitat fragmentation and hunting activities on African swine fever dynamics among wild boar populations.栖息地破碎化和狩猎活动对野猪种群中非洲猪瘟动态的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Nov;208:105750. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105750. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
4
Permeability of artificial barriers (fences) for wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Mediterranean mixed landscapes.人工屏障(围栏)对地中海混合景观中野猪(Sus scrofa)的渗透性。
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Jun;78(6):2277-2286. doi: 10.1002/ps.6853. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
5
Understanding the transmission of African swine fever in wild boars of South Korea: A simulation study for parameter estimation.了解韩国野猪中非洲猪瘟的传播:参数估计的模拟研究。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Jul;69(4):e1101-e1112. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14403. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
Predicting Suitable Areas for African Swine Fever Outbreaks in Wild Boars in South Korea and Their Implications for Managing High-Risk Pig Farms.预测韩国野猪非洲猪瘟疫情的适宜区域及其对高风险猪场管理的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;13(13):2148. doi: 10.3390/ani13132148.
7
Predicting spread and effective control measures for African swine fever-Should we blame the boars?预测非洲猪瘟的传播和有效控制措施-我们是否应该归咎于野猪?
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Mar;68(2):397-416. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13690. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
8
Retrospective spatial analysis for African swine fever in endemic areas to assess interactions between susceptible host populations.回顾性空间分析在流行地区的非洲猪瘟,以评估易感宿主种群之间的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233473. eCollection 2020.
9
Prevalence and spatiotemporal distribution of African swine fever in Lithuania, 2014-2017.2014-2017 年立陶宛非洲猪瘟的流行情况和时空分布。
Virol J. 2018 Nov 19;15(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1090-8.
10
African Swine Fever in Wild Boar in Europe-A Review.欧洲野猪中的非洲猪瘟综述
Viruses. 2021 Aug 30;13(9):1717. doi: 10.3390/v13091717.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk and protective factors for ASF in domestic pigs and wild boar in the EU, and mitigation measures for managing the disease in wild boar.欧盟家猪和野猪感染非洲猪瘟的风险及保护因素,以及野猪疾病管理的缓解措施。
EFSA J. 2024 Dec 4;22(12):e9095. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9095. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Wild Boar Proves High Tolerance to Human-Caused Disruptions: Management Implications in African Swine Fever Outbreaks.野猪对人为干扰具有高耐受性:非洲猪瘟疫情中的管理启示
Animals (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;14(18):2710. doi: 10.3390/ani14182710.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex-specific seasonal variations of wild boar distance traveled and home range size.野猪移动距离和活动范围大小的性别特异性季节性变化。
Curr Zool. 2023 May 9;70(3):284-290. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoad021. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Olfactory repellents decrease the number of ungulate-vehicle collisions on roads: Results of a two-year carcass study.嗅觉驱避剂可减少道路上有蹄类动物与车辆的碰撞次数:一项为期两年的尸体研究结果
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;365:121561. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121561. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Behavioural and physiological responses of Small Tail Han sheep to predators.
小尾寒羊对捕食者的行为和生理反应。
Animal. 2023 Aug;17(8):100884. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100884. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
African swine fever outbreaks in China led to gross domestic product and economic losses.中国的非洲猪瘟疫情导致了国内生产总值和经济损失。
Nat Food. 2021 Oct;2(10):802-808. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00362-1. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
5
Worse sleep and increased energy expenditure yet no movement changes in sub-urban wild boar experiencing an influx of human visitors (anthropulse) during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,城市周边野猪(anthropulse)涌入人类访客,导致睡眠质量变差和能量消耗增加,但运动行为没有变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 25;879:163106. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163106. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
6
The importance of fine-scale predictors of wild boar habitat use in an isolated population.野猪栖息地利用的精细尺度预测因子在一个孤立种群中的重要性。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Jun 22;12(6):e9031. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9031. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
African Swine Fever Survey in a European Context.欧洲背景下的非洲猪瘟调查
Pathogens. 2022 Jan 23;11(2):137. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11020137.
8
Wildlife collisions put a dent in road safety.野生动物与车辆碰撞对道路安全造成了损害。
Science. 2021 Dec 3;374(6572):1208. doi: 10.1126/science.abm8468. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
9
Different patterns of human activities in nature during Covid-19 pandemic and African swine fever outbreak confirm direct impact on wildlife disruption.在新冠疫情和非洲猪瘟爆发期间,人类在自然界中活动的不同模式证实了其对野生动物干扰的直接影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20791. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99862-0.
10
Epidemiological analysis of African swine fever in the European Union (September 2019 to August 2020).欧盟非洲猪瘟流行病学分析(2019年9月至2020年8月)
EFSA J. 2021 May 6;19(5):e06572. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6572. eCollection 2021 May.