Boklund Anette Ella, Ståhl Karl, Miranda Chueca Miguel Ángel, Podgórski Tomasz, Vergne Timothée, Cortiñas Abrahantes José, Cattaneo Eleonora, Dhollander Sofie, Papanikolaou Alexandra, Tampach Stefania, Mur Lina
EFSA J. 2024 Dec 4;22(12):e9095. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9095. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Five epidemiological aspects of ASF were evaluated using literature reviews, field studies, questionnaires and mathematical models. First, a literature review and a case-control study in commercial pig farms emphasised the importance of biosecurity and farming practices, including the spread of manure around farms and the use of bedding material as risk factors, while the use of insect nets was a protective factor. Second, although wild boar density is a relevant known factor, the statistical and mechanistic models did not show a clear and consistent effect of wild boar density on ASF epidemiology in the selected scenarios. Other factors, such as vegetation, altitude, climate and barriers affecting population connectivity, also played a role on ASF epidemiology in wild boar. Third, knowledge on competence, presence and surveillance was updated concluding that this species did not play any role in the current ASF epidemic in affected areas of the EU. Available scientific evidence suggests that stable flies and horse flies are exposed to ASFV in affected areas of the EU and have the capacity to introduce ASFV into farms and transmit it to pigs. However, there is uncertainty about whether this occurs, and if so, to what extent. Fourth, research and field experience from affected countries in the EU demonstrates that the use of fences, potentially used with existing road infrastructure, coupled with other control methods such as culling and carcass removal, can effectively reduce wild boar movements contributing to ASF management in wild boar. Fences can contribute to control ASF in both scenarios, focal introductions and wave-like spread. Fifth, the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) vaccines as an immune contraceptive has the potential, as a complementary tool, to reduce and control wild boar populations. However, the development of an oral GnRH vaccine for wild boar still requires substantial additional work.
利用文献综述、实地研究、问卷调查和数学模型对非洲猪瘟的五个流行病学方面进行了评估。第一,一项文献综述以及在商业猪场开展的病例对照研究强调了生物安全和养殖方式的重要性,包括农场周围粪便的传播以及垫料的使用作为风险因素,而使用防虫网则是一个保护因素。第二,虽然野猪密度是一个相关的已知因素,但统计模型和机理模型在选定情景中均未显示出野猪密度对非洲猪瘟流行病学有明确且一致的影响。其他因素,如植被、海拔、气候和影响种群连通性的屏障,也在野猪的非洲猪瘟流行病学中发挥了作用。第三,关于能力、存在情况和监测的知识得到了更新,得出的结论是该物种在欧盟受影响地区当前的非洲猪瘟疫情中未发挥任何作用。现有科学证据表明,厩螫蝇和马蝇在欧盟受影响地区接触到了非洲猪瘟病毒,并有能力将该病毒引入农场并传播给猪。然而,对于这种情况是否发生以及如果发生的话程度如何存在不确定性。第四,欧盟受影响国家的研究和实地经验表明,使用围栏(可能与现有的道路基础设施结合使用),再加上其他控制方法,如扑杀和清除 carcass,可有效减少野猪活动,有助于对野猪进行非洲猪瘟管理。围栏在局部引入和波浪式传播这两种情景下都有助于控制非洲猪瘟。第五,使用促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)疫苗作为免疫避孕方法,作为一种补充工具,有可能减少和控制野猪数量。然而,开发用于野猪的口服GnRH疫苗仍需要大量额外工作。 (注:原文中carcass未翻译完整,可能是输入有误,推测完整单词为carcasses,意为“尸体”)