Liu Jia-Cheng, Ruan Xiao-Hao, Chun Tsun-Tsun, Yao Chi, Huang Da, Wong Hoi-Lung, Lai Chun-Ting, Tsang Chiu-Fung, Ho Sze-Ho, Ng Tsui-Lin, Xu Dan-Feng, Na Rong
Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;16(17):2944. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172944.
Currently, prostate cancer (PCa) prebiopsy medical image diagnosis mainly relies on mpMRI and PI-RADS scores. However, PI-RADS has its limitations, such as inter- and intra-radiologist variability and the potential for imperceptible features. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a machine learning model based on radiomics analysis of MRI T2-weighted (T2w) images for predicting PCa in prebiopsy cases.
A retrospective analysis was conducted using 820 lesions (363 cases, 457 controls) from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) Database for model development and validation. An additional 83 lesions (30 cases, 53 controls) from Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital were used for independent external validation. The MRI T2w images were preprocessed, and radiomic features were extracted. Feature selection was performed using Cross Validation Least Angle Regression (CV-LARS). Using three different machine learning algorithms, a total of 18 prediction models and 3 shape control models were developed. The performance of the models, including the area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic values such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were compared to the PI-RADS scoring system for both internal and external validation.
All the models showed significant differences compared to the shape control model (all < 0.001, except SVM model PI-RADS+2 Features = 0.004, SVM model PI-RADS+3 Features = 0.002). In internal validation, the best model, based on the LR algorithm, incorporated 3 radiomic features (AUC = 0.838, sensitivity = 76.85%, specificity = 77.36%). In external validation, the LR (3 features) model outperformed PI-RADS in predictive value with AUC 0.870 vs. 0.658, sensitivity 56.67% vs. 46.67%, specificity 92.45% vs. 84.91%, PPV 80.95% vs. 63.64%, and NPV 79.03% vs. 73.77%.
The machine learning model based on radiomics analysis of MRI T2w images, along with simulated biopsy, provides additional diagnostic value to the PI-RADS scoring system in predicting PCa.
目前,前列腺癌(PCa)活检前医学图像诊断主要依赖于多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)和前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分。然而,PI-RADS存在局限性,如放射科医生之间和内部的变异性以及存在难以察觉特征的可能性。本研究的主要目的是评估基于MRI T2加权(T2w)图像的放射组学分析的机器学习模型在预测活检前病例中PCa的有效性。
使用来自癌症影像存档(TCIA)数据库的820个病灶(363例病例,457例对照)进行回顾性分析,以进行模型开发和验证。另外从香港玛丽医院选取83个病灶(30例病例,53例对照)用于独立外部验证。对MRI T2w图像进行预处理,并提取放射组学特征。使用交叉验证最小角回归(CV-LARS)进行特征选择。使用三种不同的机器学习算法,共开发了18个预测模型和3个形状控制模型。在内部和外部验证中,将模型的性能,包括曲线下面积(AUC)以及诊断值如敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),与PI-RADS评分系统进行比较。
与形状控制模型相比,所有模型均显示出显著差异(除支持向量机(SVM)模型PI-RADS + 2特征 = 0.004,SVM模型PI-RADS + 3特征 = 0.002外,所有P < 0.001)。在内部验证中,基于逻辑回归(LR)算法的最佳模型纳入了3个放射组学特征(AUC = 0.838,敏感性 = 76.85%,特异性 = 77.36%)。在外部验证中,LR(3个特征)模型在预测价值方面优于PI-RADS,AUC分别为0.870和0.658,敏感性分别为56.67%和46.67%,特异性分别为92.45%和84.91%,PPV分别为80.95%和63.64%,NPV分别为79.03%和73.77%。
基于MRI T2w图像放射组学分析的机器学习模型,结合模拟活检,在预测PCa方面为PI-RADS评分系统提供了额外的诊断价值。