• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的 MR 影像组学分析有助于提高 PI-RADS v2 在临床相关前列腺癌中的诊断性能。

Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer.

机构信息

Center for Medical Device Evaluation, CFDA, Beijing, China, 100044.

Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China, 210009.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4082-4090. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4800-5. Epub 2017 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-017-4800-5
PMID:28374077
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help improve the performance PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

This IRB-approved study included 54 patients with PCa undergoing multi-parametric (mp) MRI before prostatectomy. Imaging analysis was performed on 54 tumours, 47 normal peripheral (PZ) and 48 normal transitional (TZ) zone based on histological-radiological correlation. Mp-MRI was scored via PI-RADS, and quantified by measuring radiomic features. Predictive model was developed using a novel support vector machine trained with: (i) radiomics, (ii) PI-RADS scores, (iii) radiomics and PI-RADS scores. Paired comparison was made via ROC analysis.

RESULTS

For PCa versus normal TZ, the model trained with radiomics had a significantly higher area under the ROC curve (Az) (0.955 [95% CI 0.923-0.976]) than PI-RADS (Az: 0.878 [0.834-0.914], p < 0.001). The Az between them was insignificant for PCa versus PZ (0.972 [0.945-0.988] vs. 0.940 [0.905-0.965], p = 0.097). When radiomics was added, performance of PI-RADS was significantly improved for PCa versus PZ (Az: 0.983 [0.960-0.995]) and PCa versus TZ (Az: 0.968 [0.940-0.985]).

CONCLUSION

Machine learning analysis of MR radiomics can help improve the performance of PI-RADS in clinically relevant PCa.

KEY POINTS

• Machine-based analysis of MR radiomics outperformed in TZ cancer against PI-RADS. • Adding MR radiomics significantly improved the performance of PI-RADS. • DKI-derived Dapp and Kapp were two strong markers for the diagnosis of PCa.

摘要

目的

研究基于机器学习的 MR 放射组学分析是否有助于提高 PI-RADS v2 在临床相关前列腺癌(PCa)中的性能。

方法

这项经 IRB 批准的研究纳入了 54 例接受前列腺切除术前行多参数(mp)MRI 检查的 PCa 患者。基于组织学-影像学相关性,对 54 个肿瘤、47 个正常外周区(PZ)和 48 个正常移行区(TZ)进行了成像分析。通过 PI-RADS 对 mp-MRI 进行评分,并通过测量放射组学特征进行定量分析。通过使用一种新的支持向量机,利用(i)放射组学、(ii)PI-RADS 评分、(iii)放射组学和 PI-RADS 评分来开发预测模型。通过 ROC 分析进行配对比较。

结果

对于 PCa 与正常 TZ 相比,基于放射组学训练的模型具有显著更高的 ROC 曲线下面积(Az)(0.955 [95%CI 0.923-0.976]),高于 PI-RADS(Az:0.878 [0.834-0.914],p < 0.001)。对于 PCa 与 PZ 相比,两者之间的 Az 无显著性差异(0.972 [0.945-0.988] vs. 0.940 [0.905-0.965],p = 0.097)。当加入放射组学后,PI-RADS 的性能对于 PCa 与 PZ(Az:0.983 [0.960-0.995])和 PCa 与 TZ(Az:0.968 [0.940-0.985])的比较均有显著提高。

结论

基于 MRI 放射组学的机器学习分析有助于提高 PI-RADS 在临床相关 PCa 中的性能。

关键要点

• 基于机器学习的 MR 放射组学分析在 TZ 癌中的表现优于 PI-RADS。

• 加入 MR 放射组学显著提高了 PI-RADS 的性能。

• DKI 衍生的 Dapp 和 Kapp 是诊断 PCa 的两个强有力的标志物。

相似文献

1
Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer.基于机器学习的 MR 影像组学分析有助于提高 PI-RADS v2 在临床相关前列腺癌中的诊断性能。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4082-4090. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4800-5. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
2
Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.前列腺癌分化与侵袭性:基于放射组学模型与 PI-RADS v2 评估的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar;49(3):875-884. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26243. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
3
Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.PI-RADS v2与PI-RADS v1的直接比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jun;85(6):1125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.025. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.PI-RADS 版本 2 和版本 2.1 对检测移行区前列腺癌的诊断准确性和观察者间一致性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 May;216(5):1247-1256. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23883. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.多参数磁共振成像检测前列腺癌:前列腺影像报告和数据系统第1版与第2版对比
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Oct 20;129(20):2451-2459. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.191771.
6
Predicting the Grade of Prostate Cancer Based on a Biparametric MRI Radiomics Signature.基于双参数 MRI 放射组学特征预测前列腺癌分级。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2021 Dec 23;2021:7830909. doi: 10.1155/2021/7830909. eCollection 2021.
7
Radiomics from multisite MRI and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.从多站点 MRI 和临床数据中提取放射组学特征,以预测具有临床意义的前列腺癌。
Acta Radiol. 2024 Mar;65(3):307-317. doi: 10.1177/02841851231216555. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
8
PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.PI-RADS 版本 2 和 2.1:六位放射科医生在周围区和移行区病变中的观察者间协议和诊断性能。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jul;217(1):141-151. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24199. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal PI-RADS 3 Lesions.基于磁共振成像放射组学的机器学习预测可疑 PI-RADS 3 病变中的临床显著前列腺癌。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Nov;54(5):1466-1473. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27692. Epub 2021 May 10.
10
[Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].[前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版诊断评分在3.0T多参数磁共振成像联合前列腺特异性抗原密度用于前列腺癌的初步适用性评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 19;97(47):3693-3698. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.47.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison in prostate cancer diagnosis with PSA 4-10 ng/mL: radiomics-based model VS. PI-RADS v2.1.在 PSA 4-10ng/mL 范围内的前列腺癌诊断中比较:基于放射组学的模型与 PI-RADS v2.1。
BMC Urol. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01625-2.
2
MRI T2w Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models in Imaging Simulated Biopsy Add Diagnostic Value to PI-RADS in Predicting Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Diagnostic Study.基于MRI T2加权成像的影像组学机器学习模型在模拟活检成像中为PI-RADS预测前列腺癌增添诊断价值:一项回顾性诊断研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;16(17):2944. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172944.
3
Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Grade to Augment Clinical Diagnosis Based on Classifier Models with Tuned Hyperparameters.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiogenomics of Glioblastoma: Machine Learning-based Classification of Molecular Characteristics by Using Multiparametric and Multiregional MR Imaging Features.脑胶质母细胞瘤的放射组学:基于机器学习的多参数多区域磁共振成像特征分子特征分类。
Radiology. 2016 Dec;281(3):907-918. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161382. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
2
An imaging-based approach predicts clinical outcomes in prostate cancer through a novel support vector machine classification.一种基于成像的方法通过一种新型支持向量机分类来预测前列腺癌的临床结果。
Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 22;7(47):78140-78151. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11293.
3
New RESOLVE-Based Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging in MRI-Visible Prostate Cancer: Effect of Reduced b Value on Image Quality and Diagnostic Effectiveness.
基于具有调优超参数的分类器模型对前列腺癌分级进行鉴别诊断以加强临床诊断
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;16(11):2163. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112163.
4
Acute hematologic toxicity prediction using dosimetric and radiomics features in patients with cervical cancer: does the treatment regimen matter?利用剂量学和放射组学特征预测宫颈癌患者的急性血液学毒性:治疗方案有影响吗?
Front Oncol. 2024 May 21;14:1365897. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1365897. eCollection 2024.
5
Application of machine learning in the preoperative radiomic diagnosis of ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst based on cone-beam CT.基于锥形束CT的机器学习在成釉细胞瘤和牙源性角化囊肿术前影像组学诊断中的应用
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Jun 28;53(5):316-324. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twae016.
6
The practical clinical role of machine learning models with different algorithms in predicting prostate cancer local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.不同算法的机器学习模型在预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌局部复发中的实际临床作用。
Cancer Imaging. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00667-x.
7
Comparison and analysis of multiple machine learning models for discriminating benign and malignant testicular lesions based on magnetic resonance imaging radiomics.基于磁共振成像放射组学的多种机器学习模型鉴别睾丸良恶性病变的比较与分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 21;10:1279622. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1279622. eCollection 2023.
8
Radiomics from multisite MRI and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.从多站点 MRI 和临床数据中提取放射组学特征,以预测具有临床意义的前列腺癌。
Acta Radiol. 2024 Mar;65(3):307-317. doi: 10.1177/02841851231216555. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
9
Evaluation of the Reliability and the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics in the Presence of Randomly Generated Irrelevant Features for Prostate Cancer.在存在随机生成的无关特征情况下对前列腺癌磁共振成像放射组学的可靠性和性能评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 1;13(23):3580. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13233580.
10
Preoperative Grading of Rectal Cancer with Multiple DWI Models, DWI-Derived Biological Markers, and Machine Learning Classifiers.基于多种扩散加权成像(DWI)模型、DWI衍生生物标志物及机器学习分类器的直肠癌术前分级
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Nov 9;10(11):1298. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10111298.
基于新RESOLVE的磁共振成像可见前列腺癌扩散峰度成像:降低b值对图像质量和诊断效能的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Aug;207(2):330-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15990. Epub 2016 May 17.
4
Validation of PI-RADS v.2 for prostate cancer diagnosis with MRI at 3T using an external phased-array coil.使用外部相控阵线圈,在3T条件下通过MRI对PI-RADS v.2用于前列腺癌诊断的验证。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Nov;44(5):1354-1359. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25284. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Allele and haplotype diversity of new multiplex of 19 ChrX-STR loci in Han population from Guanzhong region (China).中国关中地区汉族人群中19个X染色体短串联重复序列(ChrX-STR)新复合扩增体系的等位基因及单倍型多样性
Electrophoresis. 2016 Jul;37(12):1669-75. doi: 10.1002/elps.201500425. Epub 2016 May 25.
6
Interobserver Reproducibility of the PI-RADS Version 2 Lexicon: A Multicenter Study of Six Experienced Prostate Radiologists.PI-RADS v2 词典的观察者间可重复性:六位经验丰富的前列腺放射科医生的多中心研究
Radiology. 2016 Sep;280(3):793-804. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152542. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)v2版在前列腺癌检测中的评估
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Apr;85(4):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
Cancer statistics, 2016.癌症统计数据,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
9
Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images.基于多参数磁共振图像的前列腺癌Gleason评分自动分类
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 17;112(46):E6265-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505935112. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
10
Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results.基于 PI-RADS 版本 2 预测前列腺癌根治术后的生化复发:初步结果。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Aug;26(8):2502-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4077-5. Epub 2015 Nov 11.