Moon Jeong-Hyun, Park Gyoungeun, Kwon Chan-Young, Kim Joo-Hee, Kim Eun-Jung, Seo Byung-Kwan, Lee Seung-Deok, Hong Seung-Ug, Sung Won-Suk
College of Korean Medicine, Dongguk University Graduate School, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea.
Department of Oriental Neuropsychiatry, College of Korean Medicine, Dongeui University, Busan 47340, Republic of Korea.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 31;12(17):1739. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171739.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease primarily affecting the joints and requires various treatments, including medication, injection, and physiotherapy. Wu tou decoction (WTD) is a traditional Chinese medicine prescribed for RA, with several articles documenting its effectiveness in RA treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of WTD for RA. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing WTD with conventional treatments (including medication, injection, and physiotherapy) from its inception to May 2024. Primary outcomes were disease activity scores, including effective rate, tender joint count, and morning stiffness. Secondary outcomes comprised blood test results (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and rheumatoid factor) and adverse events. Nineteen RCTs involving 1794 patients were included. Statistically, WTD demonstrated better improvement than conventional treatments (18 medications and 1 injection) across the effective rate, joint scale, and blood tests, regardless of the treatment type (monotherapy or combination therapy). Adverse events were reported in 11 studies, with no statistical differences observed between them. The numerical results showed that WTD may offer potential benefits for managing RA. However, the significant discrepancy between clinical practice and the low quality of the RCTs remains a limitation. Therefore, further well-designed studies with larger patient cohorts are needed to draw definitive conclusions.
类风湿性关节炎(RA)是一种主要影响关节的自身免疫性疾病,需要多种治疗方法,包括药物治疗、注射治疗和物理治疗。乌头汤(WTD)是一种用于治疗RA的中药,有几篇文章记录了其在RA治疗中的有效性。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估WTD治疗RA的疗效和安全性。我们检索了从开始到2024年5月比较WTD与传统治疗方法(包括药物治疗、注射治疗和物理治疗)的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局指标为疾病活动评分,包括有效率、压痛关节数和晨僵。次要结局指标包括血液检查结果(红细胞沉降率、C反应蛋白和类风湿因子)和不良事件。纳入了19项涉及1794例患者的RCT。在统计学上,无论治疗类型(单药治疗或联合治疗)如何,WTD在有效率、关节量表和血液检查方面均显示出比传统治疗方法(18种药物和1种注射剂)有更好的改善。11项研究报告了不良事件,未观察到它们之间的统计学差异。数值结果表明,WTD可能对管理RA有潜在益处。然而,临床实践与RCT低质量之间的显著差异仍然是一个局限性。因此,需要进一步设计更完善、患者队列更大的研究来得出明确结论。