Anderson D W, Bryan F A, Harris B S, Lessler J T, Gagnon J P
Public Health Rep. 1985 Jul-Aug;100(4):386-93.
Identify persons with epilepsy by first looking for prescriptions for particular antiseizure drugs. Follow these prescriptions from the pharmacies to the physicians who wrote them for patients. Ask the physicians whether the patients have epilepsy. Finally, contact the patients who do have epilepsy to elicit information about the impact of that condition on their lives. With these steps, it may be possible to carry out successfully a probability survey of epilepsy in the United States population. To learn more about this approach, a field test was funded by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) of the Public Health Service. From 1978 through 1982, the work was planned, carried out, and evaluated by Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC. Epilepsy is a sensitive topic to ask about in a survey. Also, the condition is sufficiently rare to render ordinary survey approaches inefficient. Even if rarity were not an issue, there would be the problem of response error because a person with epilepsy does not, as a rule, have much clinical information on his or her condition. Better information lies with the physician who provides the care, but many physicians are busy with their practices. Furthermore, their record systems are usually not designed for easy retrieval of information, unless the names of patients are available. In the survey approach considered here, the names of patients are obtained through a random sampling of prescriptions for antiseizure drugs. The field test was divided into three phases with special activities reserved for each. The most important problem confronted was how to safeguard the confidentiality of relationships between pharmacist and patient and between physician and patient.Special guidelines on confidentiality were put into effect for the data collection. These guidelines,however, contributed to serious problems of nonresponse-especially for physicians. This article provides a brief account of the field test, including a rationale for the survey strategy of finding cases of epilepsy through prescriptions for antiseizuredrugs.
首先,通过查找特定抗癫痫药物的处方来识别癫痫患者。沿着这些从药房开出的处方找到为患者开出处方的医生。询问医生这些患者是否患有癫痫。最后,联系确实患有癫痫的患者,了解这种疾病对他们生活的影响。通过这些步骤,有可能成功地在美国人群中开展一项癫痫概率调查。为了更多地了解这种方法,美国公共卫生服务部的国家神经和交流障碍及中风研究所(NINCDS)资助了一项实地试验。从1978年到1982年,北卡罗来纳州三角研究园的三角研究所负责该工作的规划、实施和评估。在调查中询问癫痫是一个敏感话题。此外,这种疾病足够罕见,以至于普通的调查方法效率低下。即使罕见性不是问题,也会存在回答误差的问题,因为癫痫患者通常对自己的病情没有太多临床信息。更好的信息掌握在提供治疗的医生手中,但许多医生忙于他们的业务。此外,他们的记录系统通常不是为了便于检索信息而设计的,除非有患者的姓名。在这里考虑的调查方法中,通过对抗癫痫药物处方进行随机抽样来获取患者的姓名。实地试验分为三个阶段,每个阶段都有专门的活动。面临的最重要问题是如何保护药剂师与患者以及医生与患者之间关系的保密性。针对数据收集实施了关于保密性的特别指导方针。然而,这些指导方针导致了严重的无回应问题——尤其是对医生而言。本文简要介绍了实地试验,包括通过抗癫痫药物处方查找癫痫病例的调查策略的基本原理。