Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
College of Osteopathic Medicine, California Health Sciences University, Clovis, CA 93611, USA.
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 5;16(17):2992. doi: 10.3390/nu16172992.
Tools to briefly assess diet among US Spanish-speaking adults are needed to identify individuals at risk for cardiometabolic disease (CMD) related to diet. Two registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) recruited bilingual medical students to translate the validated Diet Risk Score (DRS) into Spanish (DRS-S). Participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center. Students administered the DRS-S and one 24-h recall (Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool) on one day; a second recall was administered within 1 week. Recalls were scored using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, a measure of adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Spearman correlations, weighted kappa, and ANOVA were conducted using SAS 9.4 to assess the relative validity of the DRS-S. Thirty-one Spanish-speaking adults (female: n = 17, 53%; mean age: 58 (42-69)) completed assessments. The mean DRS-S was 9 (SD = 4.2) (max: 27; higher score = higher risk) and the mean HEI-2015 score was 65.7 (SD = 9.7) (max: 100; higher score = lower risk), with significant agreement between measures (r: -0.45 ( = 0.01)), weighted kappa: -0.3 ( = 0.03). The DRS-S can be used in resource-constrained settings to assess diet for intervention and referral to RDNs. The DRS-S should be tested in clinical care to assess the impact of dietary changes to reduce CMD risk.
工具来简要评估美国讲西班牙语的成年人的饮食,以确定与饮食有关的代谢性心血管疾病(CMD)风险的个体。两位注册营养师招募双语医学生将经过验证的饮食风险评分(DRS)翻译成西班牙语(DRS-S)。参与者是从一个合格的联邦健康中心招募的。学生在一天内管理 DRS-S 和一个 24 小时回忆(自动自我管理 24 小时(ASA24)饮食评估工具); 在一周内进行第二次回忆。使用健康饮食指数(HEI)-2015 对回忆进行评分,这是对美国人饮食指南的遵守程度的衡量标准。使用 SAS 9.4 进行 Spearman 相关性、加权 Kappa 和 ANOVA 分析,以评估 DRS-S 的相对有效性。31 名讲西班牙语的成年人(女性:n = 17,53%; 平均年龄:58(42-69))完成了评估。平均 DRS-S 为 9(SD = 4.2)(最大值:27; 分数越高风险越高),平均 HEI-2015 分数为 65.7(SD = 9.7)(最大值:100; 分数越高风险越低),两种测量方法之间存在显著一致性(r:-0.45(= 0.01)),加权 Kappa:-0.3(= 0.03)。DRS-S 可用于资源有限的环境中评估干预和转介给营养师的饮食。DRS-S 应在临床护理中进行测试,以评估饮食变化对降低 CMD 风险的影响。