• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于用水量预测的机器学习技术比较分析:以科贾埃利省为例

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Water Consumption Prediction: A Case Study from Kocaeli Province.

作者信息

Görenekli Kasim, Gülbağ Ali

机构信息

Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Sakarya University, Sakarya 54050, Turkey.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 9;24(17):5846. doi: 10.3390/s24175846.

DOI:10.3390/s24175846
PMID:39275758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11397955/
Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of various Machine Learning (ML) techniques for predicting water consumption using a comprehensive dataset from Kocaeli Province, Turkey. Accurate prediction of water consumption is crucial for effective water resource management and planning, especially considering the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on water usage patterns. A total of four ML models, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), were evaluated. Additionally, optimization techniques such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and the Second-Order Optimization (SOO) Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm were employed to enhance the performance of the ML models. These models incorporate historical data from previous months to enhance model accuracy and generalizability, allowing for robust predictions that account for both short-term fluctuations and long-term trends. The performance of each model was assessed using cross-validation. The R and correlation values obtained in this study for the best-performing models are highlighted in the results section. For instance, the GBM model achieved an R value of 0.881, indicating a strong capability in capturing the underlying patterns in the data. This study is one of the first to conduct a comprehensive analysis of water consumption prediction using machine learning algorithms on a large-scale dataset of 5000 subscribers, including the unique conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The results highlight the strengths and limitations of each technique, providing insights into their applicability for water consumption prediction. This study aims to enhance the understanding of ML applications in water management and offers practical recommendations for future research and implementation.

摘要

本研究使用来自土耳其科贾埃利省的综合数据集,对用于预测用水量的各种机器学习(ML)技术进行了比较分析。准确预测用水量对于有效的水资源管理和规划至关重要,尤其是考虑到新冠疫情对用水模式的重大影响。总共评估了四种ML模型,即人工神经网络(ANN)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和梯度提升机(GBM)。此外,还采用了粒子群优化(PSO)和二阶优化(SOO)Levenberg-Marquardt(LM)算法等优化技术来提高ML模型的性能。这些模型纳入了前几个月的历史数据,以提高模型的准确性和通用性,从而能够进行稳健的预测,兼顾短期波动和长期趋势。使用交叉验证评估每个模型的性能。本研究中表现最佳的模型所获得的R值和相关值在结果部分中突出显示。例如,GBM模型的R值达到0.881,表明其在捕捉数据潜在模式方面具有很强的能力。本研究是首批使用机器学习算法对5000个用户的大规模数据集进行用水量预测综合分析的研究之一,其中包括新冠疫情带来的独特情况。结果突出了每种技术的优势和局限性,为它们在用水量预测中的适用性提供了见解。本研究旨在增进对ML在水资源管理中应用的理解,并为未来的研究和实施提供实用建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/6f9d6fdf34b8/sensors-24-05846-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/9b0462df458b/sensors-24-05846-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/9472293f7d23/sensors-24-05846-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/45f9325ccd36/sensors-24-05846-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/8ac1be8c4405/sensors-24-05846-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/505814c7a39f/sensors-24-05846-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/614f87e09e8b/sensors-24-05846-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/6f9d6fdf34b8/sensors-24-05846-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/9b0462df458b/sensors-24-05846-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/9472293f7d23/sensors-24-05846-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/45f9325ccd36/sensors-24-05846-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/8ac1be8c4405/sensors-24-05846-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/505814c7a39f/sensors-24-05846-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/614f87e09e8b/sensors-24-05846-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ce/11397955/6f9d6fdf34b8/sensors-24-05846-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Water Consumption Prediction: A Case Study from Kocaeli Province.用于用水量预测的机器学习技术比较分析:以科贾埃利省为例
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 9;24(17):5846. doi: 10.3390/s24175846.
2
Prediction of 5-day biochemical oxygen demand in the Buriganga River of Bangladesh using novel hybrid machine learning algorithms.利用新型混合机器学习算法预测孟加拉国布里甘加河的五日生化需氧量。
Water Environ Res. 2022 May;94(5):e10718. doi: 10.1002/wer.10718.
3
Prediction of Individual Gas Yields of Supercritical Water Gasification of Lignocellulosic Biomass by Machine Learning Models.基于机器学习模型预测木质纤维素生物质超临界水气化的个体产气率。
Molecules. 2024 May 16;29(10):2337. doi: 10.3390/molecules29102337.
4
A GA-stacking ensemble approach for forecasting energy consumption in a smart household: A comparative study of ensemble methods.基于 GA 堆叠的智能家居能耗预测集成方法研究:集成方法比较
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jul;364:121264. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121264. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
5
Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods and variable selection methods for predicting difficult-to-measure traits in Holstein dairy cattle using milk infrared spectral data.利用牛奶近红外光谱数据评估机器学习方法和变量选择方法在荷斯坦奶牛中预测难以测量性状的性能。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Jul;104(7):8107-8121. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19861. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Evaluation of the prediction effectiveness for geochemical mapping using machine learning methods: A case study from northern Guangdong Province in China.基于机器学习方法的地球化学填图预测效果评价:以中国广东省北部为例
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jun 1;927:172223. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172223. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
7
Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.我们是否需要不同的机器学习算法来进行定量构效关系建模?对 16 种机器学习算法在 14 个定量构效关系数据集上的综合评估。
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Jul 20;22(4). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa321.
8
Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods.使用数据挖掘方法进行精液质量预测。
Technol Health Care. 2014;22(4):531-45. doi: 10.3233/THC-140816.
9
Interpreting optimised data-driven solution with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for water quality assessment for better decision-making in pollution management.利用可解释人工智能(XAI)对优化后的数据驱动解决方案进行解读,以改善水质评估,从而在污染管理中做出更好的决策。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jun;31(30):42948-42969. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33921-7. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
10
Prediction of sepsis mortality in ICU patients using machine learning methods.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 患者的败血症死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02630-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging water-wastewater data interdependencies to understand infrastructure systems' behaviors during COVID-19 pandemic.利用水-废水数据的相互依存关系来了解新冠疫情期间基础设施系统的行为。
J Clean Prod. 2022 Sep 20;367:132962. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132962. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
2
Impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) spread-prevention actions on urban water consumption.冠状病毒(COVID-19)传播预防措施对城市用水量的影响。
Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020 Dec;163:105098. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105098. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Water demand forecasting: review of soft computing methods.
需水量预测:软计算方法综述
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Jul;189(7):313. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6030-3. Epub 2017 Jun 6.