Agarwal Abhimanyu, Mostafa Mohamed A, Ahmad Muhammad Imtiaz, Soliman Elsayed Z
Section on Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center (EPICARE), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Section on Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA.
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Sep 14;76(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00556-5.
This systematic review aims to determine the impact of isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) on cardiovascular outcomes.
We searched only English language articles on PubMed and SCOPUS until July 31, 2023 to investigate the association between IDH and cardiovascular outcomes.
This meta-analysis of 19 studies evaluated the impact of different hypertension diagnostic guidelines (ACC/AHA: American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; JNC7: Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; NICE/ESC: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence/European Society of Cardiology) on hypertension-related outcomes. Studies had varying sample sizes (173 to 2,969,679 participants) and study designs. In cohort studies using JNC7 guidelines, IDH was linked to increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (HR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.17, 1.74), CVD mortality (HR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.23, 1.84), and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk (HR: 1.65). In studies using ACC/AHA guidelines, associations with CVD risk and CVD mortality were weaker [HR: 1.16 (95% CI 1.06, 1.25) and 1.10 (95% CI 0.95, 1.25), respectively]. Subgroup analysis revealed differences in outcomes on the basis of age and sex. Cross-sectional studies did not show significant associations with JNC7 and ACC guidelines; NICE guidelines were not used in cross-sectional studies.
IDH is associated with an increased risk of CVD. Higher diastolic blood pressure cutoffs were associated with higher cardiovascular risk. This association varied by study design and effect modification by sex and race influenced the association.
本系统评价旨在确定单纯舒张期高血压(IDH)对心血管结局的影响。
我们仅在PubMed和SCOPUS上检索截至2023年7月31日的英文文章,以研究IDH与心血管结局之间的关联。
这项对19项研究的荟萃分析评估了不同高血压诊断指南(ACC/AHA:美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会;JNC7:美国高血压预防、检测、评估和治疗联合委员会;NICE/ESC:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所/欧洲心脏病学会)对高血压相关结局的影响。各研究的样本量(173至2969679名参与者)和研究设计各不相同。在使用JNC7指南的队列研究中,IDH与心血管疾病(CVD)风险增加(HR:1.45,95%CI 1.17,1.74)、CVD死亡率增加(HR:1.54,95%CI 1.23,1.84)以及冠心病(CHD)风险增加(HR:1.65)相关。在使用ACC/AHA指南的研究中,与CVD风险和CVD死亡率的关联较弱[分别为HR:1.16(95%CI 1.06,1.25)和1.10(95%CI 0.95,1.25)]。亚组分析显示了基于年龄和性别的结局差异。横断面研究未显示与JNC7和ACC指南有显著关联;横断面研究未使用NICE指南。
IDH与CVD风险增加相关。较高的舒张压临界值与较高的心血管风险相关。这种关联因研究设计而异,性别和种族的效应修饰影响了这种关联。