Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Nov;25(11):105257. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105257. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
Acute hospitalization, recurrent admissions, institutionalization, and death are important adverse health outcomes. Older adults receiving home care are especially at risk of these outcomes, yet it remains unclear if this risk differs between older adults receiving different types of home care and older adults not receiving home care.
Retrospective cohort study using national claims data from 2019.
Community-dwelling Dutch individuals aged ≥ 65 years (N = 3,174,953).
Participants were categorized: no home care, household help, personal care, household help combined with personal care, or nursing home care at home. The primary outcomes were the number of people experiencing acute hospitalization, recurrent admissions, institutionalization, or death. Logistic regression models were applied.
In total, 2,758,093 adults were included in the no home care group, 131,260 in the household help group, 154,462 in the personal care group, 96,526 in the household help combined with personal care group, and 34,612 in the nursing home care at home group. The risk of adverse outcomes differed between home care groups, with all showing higher odds compared with the no home care group. Individuals receiving household help combined with personal care had the highest odds for acute hospitalization [odds ratio (OR), 2.60; 95% CI, 2.55-2.64] and recurrent admissions (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.55-2.65), while those receiving nursing home care at home had the highest odds for death (OR, 7.59; 95% CI, 7.35-7.85) and institutionalization (OR, 63.22; 95% CI, 60.94-65.58).
Differentiating between the type of home care older adults receive identifies subpopulations with different risks for adverse health outcomes compared with older adults not receiving home care. Older adults receiving personal care (nurse based) are at high risk for these outcomes and represent a substantial population with prevention potential. Future research should focus on developing effective interventions for this group.
急性住院、再次入院、住院和死亡是重要的不良健康结果。接受家庭护理的老年人尤其有这些结果的风险,但尚不清楚这种风险是否因接受不同类型家庭护理的老年人和未接受家庭护理的老年人而有所不同。
使用 2019 年全国索赔数据的回顾性队列研究。
年龄≥ 65 岁的荷兰社区居住者(N=3174953)。
将参与者分为:无家庭护理、家庭帮助、个人护理、家庭帮助与个人护理相结合、家庭护理院。主要结局是经历急性住院、再次入院、住院或死亡的人数。应用逻辑回归模型。
共有 2758093 名成年人纳入无家庭护理组,131260 名成年人纳入家庭帮助组,154462 名成年人纳入个人护理组,96526 名成年人纳入家庭帮助与个人护理相结合组,34612 名成年人纳入家庭护理院组。不良结果的风险在家庭护理组之间存在差异,所有组与无家庭护理组相比,风险均更高。接受家庭帮助与个人护理相结合的个体发生急性住院的可能性最高[比值比(OR),2.60;95%置信区间,2.55-2.64]和再次入院(OR,2.60;95%置信区间,2.55-2.65),而在家中接受家庭护理院的个体死亡(OR,7.59;95%置信区间,7.35-7.85)和住院(OR,63.22;95%置信区间,60.94-65.58)的可能性最高。
区分老年人接受的家庭护理类型可确定与未接受家庭护理的老年人相比,不良健康结果风险不同的亚人群。接受个人护理(基于护士)的老年人有这些结果的高风险,代表了一个具有预防潜力的庞大人群。未来的研究应集中于为这一群体开发有效的干预措施。