Internal Medicine, section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, the Netherlands.
Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Science Park 123, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):1792. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19305-z.
Older adults receiving home care have a higher risk of visiting the emergency department (ED) than community-dwelling older adults not receiving home care. This may result from a higher incidence of comorbidities and reduced functional autonomy in home care recipients. Since people receive different types of home care because of their different comorbidities and autonomy profiles, it is possible that distinguishing between the form of home care can help identify subpopulations with different risks for ED visits and help develop targeted interventions. This study aimed to compare the risk of visiting the ED in older adults receiving different forms of home care with those living at home without receiving home care in a national cohort in one year.
A retrospective cohort study using claims data collected in 2019 on the Dutch population aged ≥ 65 years (N = 3,314,440) was conducted. Participants were classified as follows: no claimed home care (NO), household help (HH), personal care (PC), HH + PC, and nursing home care at home (NHH). The primary outcome was the number of individuals that visited the ED. Secondary outcomes were the number of individuals whose home care changed, who were institutionalized, or who died. Exploratory logistic regression was applied.
There were 2,758,093 adults in the NO group, 131,260 in the HH group, 154,462 in the PC group, 96,526 in the HH + PC group, and 34,612 in the NHH group. More ED visits were observed in the home care groups than in the NO group, and this risk increased to more than two-fold for the PC groups. There was a significant change to a more intensive form of home care, institutionalization, or death in all groups.
Distinguishing between the form of home care older adults receive identifies subpopulations with different risks for ED visits compared with community-dwelling older adults not receiving home care on a population level. Home care transitions are frequent and mostly involve more intensive care or death. Although older adults not receiving home care have a lower risk of ED visits, they contribute most to the absolute volume of ED visits.
接受家庭护理的老年人比未接受家庭护理的社区居住老年人更有可能去急诊部(ED)就诊。这可能是由于家庭护理接受者的合并症发病率较高和功能自主性降低所致。由于人们因合并症和自主性状况的不同而接受不同类型的家庭护理,因此区分家庭护理的形式可以帮助确定 ED 就诊风险不同的亚人群,并有助于制定有针对性的干预措施。本研究旨在比较在全国队列中,接受不同形式家庭护理的老年人与未接受家庭护理的居家老年人在一年内去 ED 的风险。
使用 2019 年收集的荷兰 65 岁以上人群的索赔数据进行回顾性队列研究(N=3,314,440)。参与者分为以下几类:无家庭护理索赔(NO)、家庭帮助(HH)、个人护理(PC)、HH+PC 和家庭养老院护理(NHH)。主要结局是去 ED 的人数。次要结局是家庭护理改变、入院或死亡的人数。应用探索性逻辑回归。
NO 组有 2758093 名成年人,HH 组有 131260 名成年人,PC 组有 154462 名成年人,HH+PC 组有 96526 名成年人,NHH 组有 34612 名成年人。家庭护理组的 ED 就诊次数多于 NO 组,PC 组的风险增加了两倍以上。所有组均有显著的家庭护理形式变化、入院或死亡。
在人群水平上,与未接受家庭护理的社区居住老年人相比,区分老年人接受的家庭护理形式可以确定 ED 就诊风险不同的亚人群。家庭护理的转变很频繁,主要涉及更密集的护理或死亡。虽然未接受家庭护理的老年人 ED 就诊风险较低,但他们对 ED 就诊的绝对人数贡献最大。