Department of Neurosurgery, Fleni. Montañeses 2325, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Department of Neurosurgery, Fleni. Montañeses 2325, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Neurochirurgie. 2024 Nov;70(6):101594. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101594. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
Since it was first described in the 1970s, functional hemispherotomy has been an essential tool in treating disabling, medically refractory epilepsy resulting from diffuse unilateral hemispheric disease. We report our experience with 23 patients who underwent hemispherotomy, both using the functional hemispherotomy (FH) as well as a modified peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) technique. We present the surgical technique for the latter, review outcomes following disconnection surgery and discuss the differences between the techniques when it comes to complications and postoperative results.
A retrospective study of 23 patients with refractory seizures who underwent cerebral hemispherectomy. A thorough analysis of the clinical, imaging, surgical features and postoperative results was performed. We also present the surgical technique for a modified PIH technique.
Between 2000 and 2020, 23 pediatric patients with refractory seizures underwent hemispherotomy (12 FHs, 11 modified PIHs). 91.3% of patients were seizure free at 6 months, 87% at 1 year, and 78.3% at last follow-up. None of the 23 patients presented Engel IV outcome. FH was found to have statistically longer surgical duration (5 ± 1.5 vs. 3.83 ± 0.5 h; p = <0.001). Neurocognition was improved in two thirds of the patients (66.9%). Our study also shows improvement of motor activity in the majority of the patients, regardless of the pathology and surgical technique. In the present report we modified the Cook et al. technique by implementing an amygdalohippocampectomy with resection of the tail of the hippocampus posteriorly and medially, to achieve temporo-occipital disconnection, instead of a complete temporal lobectomy.
When patients are wisely selected, the hemispherectomy procedure should be considered as a most attractive and curative treatment for children with refractory seizures, not only giving the patient a high chance of seizure freedom but also providing an improvement in motor and cognitive skills. In our particular case and based on the present study, the modified PIH proves to be a highly effective technique. It not only has a shorter surgical time but also a very low complication rate.
自 20 世纪 70 年代首次描述以来,功能性大脑半球切除术已成为治疗由弥漫性单侧脑疾病引起的致残性、药物难治性癫痫的重要手段。我们报告了 23 例接受大脑半球切除术的患者的经验,其中既采用了功能性大脑半球切除术(FH),也采用了改良的岛叶周围大脑半球切除术(PIH)技术。我们介绍了后者的手术技术,回顾了离断手术后的结果,并讨论了这两种技术在并发症和术后结果方面的差异。
对 23 例难治性癫痫患者进行大脑半球切除术的回顾性研究。对临床、影像学、手术特点和术后结果进行了全面分析。我们还介绍了改良 PIH 技术的手术技术。
2000 年至 2020 年,23 例难治性癫痫患儿行大脑半球切除术(12 例 FH,11 例改良 PIH)。6 个月时 91.3%的患者无癫痫发作,1 年时 87%的患者无癫痫发作,末次随访时 78.3%的患者无癫痫发作。23 例患者均未出现 Engel IV 级结果。FH 的手术时间明显长于 PIH(5±1.5 与 3.83±0.5 h;p<0.001)。有三分之二的患者神经认知功能改善(66.9%)。我们的研究还表明,无论病理和手术技术如何,大多数患者的运动活动都有所改善。在本报告中,我们对 Cook 等人的技术进行了修改,通过切除海马尾部和内侧的杏仁核-海马体,实现颞枕部离断,而不是完全行颞叶切除术。
当患者被明智地选择时,半球切除术应被视为儿童难治性癫痫的一种最有吸引力和最有效的治疗方法,不仅使患者有很高的癫痫无发作机会,而且还能提高运动和认知技能。在我们的特殊情况下,根据本研究,改良的 PIH 被证明是一种非常有效的技术。它不仅手术时间更短,而且并发症发生率也非常低。