Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Neuroscience, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Oct;359:117231. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117231. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
Social media (SM) is increasingly utilised to disseminate mental health (MH) public service announcements (PSAs) and campaigns, connecting the public with support or resources. However, the effectiveness of MH campaigns/PSAs is often overlooked, and actions following exposure are rarely measured. We aimed to i) systematically review research on MH campaigns/PSAs disseminated via SM to determine their efficacy in eliciting engagement, help-seeking/behavioural change and ii) identify components that may facilitate engagement, help-seeking/behavioural change. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Fourteen studies were eligible. The campaigns/PSAs targeted various MH concerns and country dissemination was diverse. Twitter/X was the most prevalent SM platform (n = 11), followed by Facebook (n = 8). All campaigns/PSAs generated engagement although engagement level benchmarks were inconsistent or absent, a proportion measured formal help-seeking behaviours (n = 1) or behavioural/language/knowledge change (n = 8). Components influencing engagement included videos/live streams, relatable content, the organisation/account disseminating the content, how information was conveyed, and external events. We highlight the heterogeneity of research in SM MH campaign/PSA evaluation and identify commonalities across studies potentially responsible for eliciting engagement, behavioural change and/or help-seeking in future campaigns/PSAs.
社交媒体(SM)越来越多地被用于传播心理健康(MH)公益广告和活动,将公众与支持或资源联系起来。然而,心理健康活动/公益广告的效果往往被忽视,很少有人对其后续效果进行评估。我们的目的是:i)系统地回顾通过 SM 传播的 MH 活动/公益广告的研究,以确定它们在引起参与、寻求帮助/行为改变方面的效果;ii)确定可能促进参与、寻求帮助/行为改变的因素。本综述遵循 PRISMA 指南。共有 14 项研究符合纳入标准。这些活动/公益广告针对各种心理健康问题,传播范围也各不相同。Twitter/X 是最常见的 SM 平台(n=11),其次是 Facebook(n=8)。所有活动/公益广告都引起了参与,但参与水平的基准不一致或不存在,一部分测量了正式的寻求帮助行为(n=1)或行为/语言/知识变化(n=8)。影响参与的因素包括视频/直播、相关内容、传播内容的组织/账户、信息传达方式以及外部活动。我们强调了 SM MH 活动/公益广告评估研究中的异质性,并确定了跨研究的共同点,这些共同点可能在未来的活动/公益广告中引发参与、行为改变和/或寻求帮助。