School of Psychology, University of Ottawa , Ottawa K1N 6N5, Canada.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Nov 4;379(1913):20230399. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0399. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
Children's episodic future-thinking is typically assessed using experimental tasks that measure whether children select an item with future utility. Although these tasks-inspired by Tulving's seminal 'spoon test' (Tulving E. 2005 Episodic memory and autonoesis: uniquely human? In [eds HS Terrace, J Metcalfe], pp. 3-56. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.001.0001])-are passed around age 4, they tell us little about the functional significance of children's episodic future-thinking in their day-to-day lives. We highlight how a naturalistic approach can shed light on this issue, and present a small study where we recruited mothers to report on their children's ( = 12, 3- and 4-year-olds and 6- and 7-year-olds) future-thinking over a 7-day period. We used a thematic analysis to understand why children express future thoughts and derived the following themes: (1) expressing future desires and/or intentions, (2) future-oriented information-seeking, (3) connecting present actions with future outcomes, and (4) predicting future mental/physiological states. We compare these themes with recent accounts of the functional significance of future-thinking in adults and conclude that children largely express their future-thinking verbally to request information or support from their parent-likely because they do not yet possess enough control/autonomy to independently act for their own future. Our findings both complement and extend an experimental approach and further elucidate the functional significance of mental time travel in children. This article is part of the theme issue 'Elements of episodic memory: lessons from 40 years of research'.
儿童的情景式未来思维通常通过实验任务来评估,这些任务衡量儿童是否选择具有未来效用的物品。尽管这些任务是受图尔文开创性的“勺子测试”(Tulving E. 2005 Episodic memory and autonoesis: uniquely human? In [eds HS Terrace, J Metcalfe], pp. 3-56. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.001.0001])的启发而设计的,但它们在儿童日常生活中的情景式未来思维的功能意义方面告诉我们的信息很少。我们强调了自然主义方法如何能够阐明这个问题,并展示了一项小型研究,我们招募了母亲报告他们的孩子(= 12、3 岁和 4 岁以及 6 岁和 7 岁)在 7 天内的未来思维。我们使用主题分析来理解为什么孩子们表达未来的想法,并得出以下主题:(1)表达未来的愿望和/或意图,(2)面向未来的信息寻求,(3)将现在的行动与未来的结果联系起来,(4)预测未来的心理/生理状态。我们将这些主题与最近关于成人未来思维功能意义的描述进行了比较,并得出结论,儿童主要通过口头表达他们的未来思维来请求父母提供信息或支持,这可能是因为他们还没有足够的控制/自主权来独立为自己的未来行事。我们的研究结果既补充了实验方法,又进一步阐明了儿童心理时间旅行的功能意义。本文是主题为“情景记忆的要素:40 年研究的经验教训”的一部分。