• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哺乳动物在人类干扰的景观中从捕获和标记中恢复得更快。

Mammals show faster recovery from capture and tagging in human-disturbed landscapes.

机构信息

Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.

Animal Ecology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 15;15(1):8079. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52381-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-52381-8
PMID:39278967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402999/
Abstract

Wildlife tagging provides critical insights into animal movement ecology, physiology, and behavior amid global ecosystem changes. However, the stress induced by capture, handling, and tagging can impact post-release locomotion and activity and, consequently, the interpretation of study results. Here, we analyze post-tagging effects on 1585 individuals of 42 terrestrial mammal species using collar-collected GPS and accelerometer data. Species-specific displacements and overall dynamic body acceleration, as a proxy for activity, were assessed over 20 days post-release to quantify disturbance intensity, recovery duration, and speed. Differences were evaluated, considering species-specific traits and the human footprint of the study region. Over 70% of the analyzed species exhibited significant behavioral changes following collaring events. Herbivores traveled farther with variable activity reactions, while omnivores and carnivores were initially less active and mobile. Recovery duration proved brief, with alterations diminishing within 4-7 tracking days for most species. Herbivores, particularly males, showed quicker displacement recovery (4 days) but slower activity recovery (7 days). Individuals in high human footprint areas displayed faster recovery, indicating adaptation to human disturbance. Our findings emphasize the necessity of extending tracking periods beyond 1 week and particular caution in remote study areas or herbivore-focused research, specifically in smaller mammals.

摘要

野生动物标记为研究动物在全球生态系统变化中的运动生态、生理学和行为提供了重要的见解。然而,捕捉、处理和标记所带来的压力会影响释放后的运动和活动能力,从而影响研究结果的解读。在这里,我们利用项圈收集的 GPS 和加速度计数据,分析了 42 种陆地哺乳动物 1585 个个体的标记后效应。我们在释放后 20 天内评估了物种特异性位移和整体动态身体加速度(作为活动的代理),以量化干扰强度、恢复持续时间和速度。考虑到物种特异性特征和研究区域的人为足迹,我们评估了差异。超过 70%的分析物种在佩戴项圈后表现出明显的行为变化。食草动物的活动反应具有变异性,移动距离更远,而杂食动物和肉食动物最初的活动和移动能力较低。恢复持续时间很短,大多数物种在 4-7 天的跟踪天数内,变化就会减少。食草动物,特别是雄性,恢复位移的速度更快(4 天),但恢复活动的速度较慢(7 天)。在人类足迹较大的地区,个体的恢复速度较快,这表明它们适应了人类的干扰。我们的研究结果强调了在 1 周以上延长跟踪时间的必要性,并特别需要谨慎对待在偏远研究区域或专注于食草动物的研究中,特别是在小型哺乳动物中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e2/11402999/4f83f685d136/41467_2024_52381_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e2/11402999/89e463893502/41467_2024_52381_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e2/11402999/1b3f5c8599c3/41467_2024_52381_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e2/11402999/4f83f685d136/41467_2024_52381_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e2/11402999/89e463893502/41467_2024_52381_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e2/11402999/1b3f5c8599c3/41467_2024_52381_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4e2/11402999/4f83f685d136/41467_2024_52381_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mammals show faster recovery from capture and tagging in human-disturbed landscapes.哺乳动物在人类干扰的景观中从捕获和标记中恢复得更快。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 15;15(1):8079. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52381-8.
2
Disturbance type and species life history predict mammal responses to humans.干扰类型和物种生活史可预测哺乳动物对人类的反应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Aug;27(16):3718-3731. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15650. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Functional diversity loss and change in nocturnal behavior of mammals under anthropogenic disturbance.人为干扰下哺乳动物功能多样性丧失和夜间行为变化。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Jun;36(3):e13839. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13839. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
4
Carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems: do browsing and grazing herbivores matter?陆地生态系统中的碳储存:食草动物的啃食和放牧有影响吗?
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 Feb;87(1):72-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00185.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
5
Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs.野生猎豹狩猎的运动动力学。
Nature. 2013 Jun 13;498(7453):185-9. doi: 10.1038/nature12295.
6
The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality.人类干扰对野生动物夜间活动的影响。
Science. 2018 Jun 15;360(6394):1232-1235. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7121.
7
Combining paleo-data and modern exclosure experiments to assess the impact of megafauna extinctions on woody vegetation.结合古数据和现代围栏实验来评估大型动物灭绝对木本植被的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 26;113(4):847-55. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502545112. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
8
Terrestrial mammalian wildlife responses to Unmanned Aerial Systems approaches.地面哺乳动物对无人机系统方法的反应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 14;9(1):2142. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38610-x.
9
The distribution of large herbivore hotspots in relation to environmental and anthropogenic correlates in the Mara region of Kenya.肯尼亚马拉地区大型食草动物热点与环境和人为因素相关性的分布。
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Nov;81(6):1268-1287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02000.x. Epub 2012 May 28.
10
Behavioral responses of terrestrial mammals to COVID-19 lockdowns.陆生哺乳动物对 COVID-19 封锁的行为反应。
Science. 2023 Jun 9;380(6649):1059-1064. doi: 10.1126/science.abo6499. Epub 2023 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Why catch when you can throw? A framework for tagging animals without capture or restraint.能扔的时候何必抓?一种无需捕获或束缚即可给动物标记的框架。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jul 16;12(7):250139. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250139. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral responses of terrestrial mammals to COVID-19 lockdowns.陆生哺乳动物对 COVID-19 封锁的行为反应。
Science. 2023 Jun 9;380(6649):1059-1064. doi: 10.1126/science.abo6499. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
2
Biological Earth observation with animal sensors.动物传感器的生物地球观测。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2022 Apr;37(4):293-298. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.11.011.
3
Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement.大数据方法提高了对动物运动生态学的理解。
Science. 2022 Feb 18;375(6582):eabg1780. doi: 10.1126/science.abg1780.
4
Settle Down! Ranging Behaviour Responses of Roe Deer to Different Capture and Release Methods.安静下来!狍对不同捕捉和放归方法的活动范围行为反应。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Nov 18;11(11):3299. doi: 10.3390/ani11113299.
5
Animal lifestyle affects acceptable mass limits for attached tags.动物的生活方式会影响附着标签的可接受质量限制。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Oct 27;288(1961):20212005. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2005.
6
Potential effects of GPS collars on the behaviour of two red pandas (Ailurus fulgens) in Rotterdam Zoo.GPS 项圈对鹿特丹动物园两只红熊猫(Ailurus fulgens)行为的潜在影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252456. eCollection 2021.
7
Movement and Seasonal Energetics Mediate Vulnerability to Disturbance in Marine Mammal Populations.运动和季节性能量学介导海洋哺乳动物种群对干扰的脆弱性。
Am Nat. 2021 Mar;197(3):296-311. doi: 10.1086/712798. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
8
Long-term capture and handling effects on body condition, reproduction and survival in a semi-aquatic mammal.长期的捕获和处理对半水生哺乳动物身体状况、繁殖和生存的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74933-w.
9
A new direction for differentiating animal activity based on measuring angular velocity about the yaw axis.基于测量偏航轴角速度来区分动物活动的新方向。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jul 6;10(14):7872-7886. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6515. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Movement-mediated community assembly and coexistence.运动介导的群落组装和共存。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Aug;95(4):1073-1096. doi: 10.1111/brv.12600. Epub 2020 Apr 20.