Wilson Danielle L, Whenn Carley, Barnes Maree, Walker Susan P, Howard Mark E
Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
BJOG. 2025 Jan;132(2):145-154. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17952. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
To assess the effectiveness and acceptability of a pillow-like position modification device to reduce supine sleep during late pregnancy, and to determine the impacts on the severity of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and foetal well-being.
Randomised cross-over study.
Individuals in the third trimester of pregnancy receiving antenatal care at a tertiary maternity hospital in Australia.
Participants used their own pillow for a control week and an intervention pillow for a week overnight, in randomised order. Sleep position and total sleep time for each night of both weeks were objectively monitored, with a sleep study and foetal heart rate monitoring performed on the last night of each week.
Primary outcome = percentage of sleep time in the supine position; secondary outcomes = apnoea-hypopnoea index, foetal heart rate decelerations and birthweight centile.
Forty-one individuals were randomised with data collected on 35 participants over 469 nights. There was no difference in percentage of total sleep time in the supine position overnight between the control or intervention pillow week (13.0% [6.1, 25.5] vs. 16.0% [5.6, 27.2], p = 0.81 with a mean difference of 2.5% [95% CI] = -0.7, 5.6, p = 0.12), and no difference in the severity of SDB or foetal heart rate decelerations across weeks. However, increased supine sleep was significantly related to a higher apnoea-hypopnoea index (r = 0.37, p = 0.003), lower birthweight (r = -0.45, p = 0.007) and lower birthweight centile (r = -0.45, p = 0.006). The proportion of supine sleep each night of the week varied widely both within and across participants, despite awareness of side-sleeping recommendations.
We found no evidence to suggest that the adoption of a pillow designed to discourage supine sleep was effective in late pregnancy, with women spending an average of 1 h per night supine. Alternative devices should be investigated, incorporating lessons learnt from this study to inform trials of supine sleep minimisation in pregnancy.
Clinical Trial: (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry): ACTRN12620000371998.
评估一种类似枕头的体位改变装置在妊娠晚期减少仰卧睡眠的有效性和可接受性,并确定其对睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)严重程度和胎儿健康的影响。
随机交叉研究。
在澳大利亚一家三级妇产医院接受产前护理的妊娠晚期个体。
参与者以随机顺序,使用自己的枕头度过一个对照周,使用干预枕头度过一个夜间周。客观监测两周内每晚的睡眠姿势和总睡眠时间,在每周的最后一晚进行睡眠研究和胎儿心率监测。
主要结局=仰卧位睡眠时间百分比;次要结局=呼吸暂停低通气指数、胎儿心率减速和出生体重百分位数。
41名个体被随机分组,在35名参与者的469个夜晚收集了数据。对照枕头周和干预枕头周之间,夜间仰卧位总睡眠时间百分比无差异(13.0%[6.1,25.5]对16.0%[5.6,27.2],p = 0.81,平均差异2.5%[95%CI]= -0.7,5.6,p = 0.12),且各周SDB严重程度或胎儿心率减速无差异。然而,仰卧睡眠增加与较高的呼吸暂停低通气指数显著相关(r = 0.37,p = 0.003)、较低的出生体重(r = -0.45,p = 0.007)和较低的出生体重百分位数(r = -0.45,p = 0.006)。尽管知晓侧卧建议,但参与者每晚仰卧睡眠的比例在个体内和个体间差异很大。
我们没有发现证据表明采用旨在避免仰卧睡眠的枕头在妊娠晚期有效,女性平均每晚仰卧睡眠1小时。应研究其他装置,借鉴本研究的经验教训,为妊娠期间尽量减少仰卧睡眠的试验提供参考。
临床试验:(澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心):ACTRN12620000371998。