Assegaf Tengku Sdis, Jusuf Nelva K, Pane Yunita S, Rusda Muhammad, Darmani Endang H, Amin Mustafa M, Lubis Ramona Ds, Bachtiar Adang
Doctoral Student of Philosophy Doctor in Medicine Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia.
Narra J. 2024 Aug;4(2):e876. doi: 10.52225/narra.v4i2.876. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
Butterfly pea flower () may serve as an alternative anti-dandruff treatment; however, its effects on spp. remain unexplored. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of as an herbal-based anti-dandruff treatment on spp. DNA expression, plakoglobin levels, IL-8 levels, sebum levels, dandruff severity scores, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction. An experimental study with a pretest-posttest control design was conducted at the Outpatient Clinic of Dermatology and Venereology, Arifin Achmad Hospital, Pekanbaru, Indonesia, from November 2023 to January 2024. The flower of was used to formulate the shampoo. The study involved 70 female patients aged 18-25 with dandruff, who were divided into two groups: (a) experimental group using 20% shampoo and (b) control group using 2% ketoconazole shampoo. The present study found that 2% ketoconazole shampoo significantly reduced spp. DNA expression compared to 20% shampooo (: ΔCq=1.76±3.18; ketoconazole: ΔCq=3.77±2.90; =0.008). No significant difference was observed in plakoglobin levels (: ΔCq=1.98±3.63; ketoconazole: ΔCq=2.50±2.36; =0.427) or IL-8 levels (: ΔCq=3.46±4.00; ketoconazole: ΔCq=4.16 ± 3.62; =0.459). significantly reduced sebum levels more than ketoconazole (: 1.16±0.98%; ketoconazole: 0.22±0.38%; <0.001). Dandruff scores and patient satisfaction were similar for both shampoos (=0.115 and =0.336, respectively). Adverse effects were more common in the 2% ketoconazole shampoo group, affecting 21.2% of the patients. In conclusion, 2% ketoconazole shampoo is more effective in reducing spp. DNA expression, while 20% shampoo offers better sebum control. Both shampoos are similarly effective in ameliorating dandruff severity and are well-tolerated, with fewer adverse effects reported for .
蝶豆花可能是一种替代性的去屑治疗方法;然而,其对马拉色菌属的影响仍未得到探索。本研究的目的是探讨以草药为基础的蝶豆花去屑治疗对马拉色菌属DNA表达、桥粒斑蛋白水平、白细胞介素-8水平、皮脂水平、头皮屑严重程度评分、不良反应及患者满意度的影响。2023年11月至2024年1月,在印度尼西亚北干巴鲁阿利芬·艾哈迈德医院皮肤科和性病科门诊进行了一项采用前后测对照设计的实验研究。用蝶豆花来配制洗发水。该研究纳入了70名年龄在18 - 25岁有头皮屑的女性患者,她们被分为两组:(a) 使用20%蝶豆洗发水的实验组和(b) 使用2%酮康唑洗发水的对照组。本研究发现,与20%蝶豆洗发水相比,2%酮康唑洗发水能显著降低马拉色菌属DNA表达(蝶豆:ΔCq = 1.76 ± 3.18;酮康唑:ΔCq = 3.77 ± 2.90;P = 0.008)。在桥粒斑蛋白水平(蝶豆:ΔCq = 1.98 ± 3.63;酮康唑:ΔCq = 2.50 ± 2.36;P = 0.427)或白细胞介素-8水平(蝶豆:ΔCq = 3.46 ± 4.00;酮康唑:ΔCq = 4.16 ± 3.62;P = 0.459)方面未观察到显著差异。蝶豆比酮康唑更能显著降低皮脂水平(蝶豆:1.16 ± 0.98%;酮康唑:0.22 ± 0.38%;P < 0.001)。两种洗发水的头皮屑评分和患者满意度相似(分别为P = 0.115和P = 0.336)。2%酮康唑洗发水组的不良反应更常见,影响了21.2%的患者。总之,2%酮康唑洗发水在降低马拉色菌属DNA表达方面更有效,而20%蝶豆洗发水在控制皮脂方面效果更好。两种洗发水在改善头皮屑严重程度方面同样有效,且耐受性良好,蝶豆报告的不良反应较少。