• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大西部三个农田中SoilOptix®校准对土壤pH值和可交换阳离子的估计——对管理空间变异土壤酸度的意义

Calibrated SoilOptix ® estimates of soil pH and exchangeable cations in three agricultural fields in western Canada - implications for managing spatially variable soil acidity.

作者信息

Enesi Rebecca Oiza, Dyck Miles F, Thilakarathna Malinda S, Strelkov Stephen E, Gorim Linda Yuya

机构信息

Department of Agriculture, Food & Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada.

Department of Renewable Resource, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Aug 28;10(17):e37106. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37106. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37106
PMID:39281450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402233/
Abstract

Spatial variability in soil pH is a major contributor to within-field variations in soil fertility and crop productivity. An improved understanding of the spatial variability of soil pH within agricultural fields is required to determine liming requirements for precision farming. This study with the use of proximal sensors, firstly assessed the spatial pattern of soil pH and how it can be used to determine site-specific, spatially variable lime requirements. Secondly, the effects of soil pH on soil concentrations of nitrate nitrogen (N0-N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), sulfur (SO-S), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), soil organic matter (SOM), aluminum (Al), and manganese (Mn) were assessed in three study fields in central Alberta, Canada. Soil pH varied between 4.5 and 7.5 across all field sites. The field-scale coefficient of variation (CV %) for soil pH, Al and Mn ranged between 4.39 and 7.50 %, 7.33-13.72 %, and 7.33-13.72 % across the three sites. The other soil properties showed low, moderate, and high variability, with field-scale CVs ranging between 6.39 and 17.70 % for SOM and 24.33-91.39 % for SO-S. Soil pH exhibited positive correlations with both Ca and Mg, across all fields. Negative correlations were observed between soil pH and Al across all fields. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed for all soil parameters and two principal components accounted for 50 %, 54.9 %, and 76.8 % of the total variance in field 1, field 2, and field 3, respectively. Geostatistical semivariance indicated a strong spatial dependence of all chemical parameters across fields. Large regions within a field were strongly acidic (pH < 5.5) and required lime applications ranging from 0 to 6 t ha. We conclude that proximal soil sensors can be calibrated to soil properties, enabling variable rate lime recommendations on spatially variable fields for the management of soil acidity.

摘要

土壤pH值的空间变异性是造成田间土壤肥力和作物生产力差异的主要因素。为了确定精准农业的石灰需求量,需要更好地了解农田土壤pH值的空间变异性。本研究使用近距离传感器,首先评估了土壤pH值的空间格局以及如何利用它来确定特定地点、空间变异的石灰需求量。其次,在加拿大艾伯塔省中部的三个研究田块中,评估了土壤pH值对土壤中硝态氮(N0-N)、磷(P)、钾(K)、硫(SO-S)、钙(Ca)、镁(Mg)、土壤有机质(SOM)、铝(Al)和锰(Mn)浓度的影响。所有田块的土壤pH值在4.5至7.5之间变化。三个田块土壤pH值、Al和Mn的田间尺度变异系数(CV%)在4.39%至7.50%、7.33%至13.72%和7.33%至13.72%之间。其他土壤性质表现出低、中、高变异性,SOM的田间尺度CV在6.39%至17.70%之间,SO-S的田间尺度CV在24.33%至91.39%之间。在所有田块中,土壤pH值与Ca和Mg均呈正相关。在所有田块中,土壤pH值与Al之间均呈负相关。对所有土壤参数进行了主成分分析(PCA),第一主成分和第二主成分分别解释了第1块田、第2块田和第3块田总方差的50%、54.9%和76.8%。地统计半方差表明,所有化学参数在田间具有很强的空间依赖性。田间大片区域呈强酸性(pH < 5.5),需要施用0至6 t/ha的石灰。我们得出结论,近距离土壤传感器可以根据土壤性质进行校准,从而在空间变异的田块上实现可变施用量的石灰推荐,以管理土壤酸度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/c857c4b29d68/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/30cb562ce48e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/f111f19f1977/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/9987ae1aca59/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/97389f6b5565/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/9a31dde770e8/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/0731cee747f0/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/2a447bb31da5/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/fb85f91d4e59/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/1d16d7546bd4/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/d9d4abb2fb32/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/1f479fabe8c7/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/c857c4b29d68/gr12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/30cb562ce48e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/f111f19f1977/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/9987ae1aca59/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/97389f6b5565/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/9a31dde770e8/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/0731cee747f0/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/2a447bb31da5/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/fb85f91d4e59/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/1d16d7546bd4/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/d9d4abb2fb32/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/1f479fabe8c7/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29f0/11402233/c857c4b29d68/gr12.jpg

相似文献

1
Calibrated SoilOptix ® estimates of soil pH and exchangeable cations in three agricultural fields in western Canada - implications for managing spatially variable soil acidity.加拿大西部三个农田中SoilOptix®校准对土壤pH值和可交换阳离子的估计——对管理空间变异土壤酸度的意义
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 28;10(17):e37106. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37106. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
2
Variability analysis of soil properties, mapping, and crop test responses in Southern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南部土壤特性的变异性分析、制图及作物试验响应
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 2;9(3):e14013. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14013. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Liming effects of poultry litter derived biochar on soil acidity amelioration and maize growth.禽畜粪便衍生生物炭对土壤酸化的改良作用及对玉米生长的影响。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Oct 1;202:110865. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110865. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Calculation of spatially explicit amounts and intervals of agricultural lime applications at county-level in China.中国县级农业石灰施用量及施用间隔的空间明确计算。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 4):150955. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150955. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
5
Cumulative and residual effects of repeated sewage sludge applications: forage productivity and soil quality implications in South Florida, USA.重复施用污水污泥的累积和残留效应:对美国南佛罗里达州牧草生产力和土壤质量的影响
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2005;12(2):80-8. doi: 10.1065/espr2004.10.220.
6
Effect of lime rates and method of application on soil properties of acidic Luvisols and wheat (, L.) yields in northwest Ethiopia.石灰施用量和施用方法对埃塞俄比亚西北部酸性淋溶土土壤性质及小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)产量的影响
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 23;9(3):e13988. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13988. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Spatial prediction of lime requirements by adjusting aluminium saturation in Sub-Saharan Africa croplands.通过调整撒哈拉以南非洲农田的铝饱和度来进行石灰需求的空间预测。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 15;908:167989. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167989. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
8
Interaction of liming and long-term fertilization increased crop yield and phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) through mediating exchangeable cations in acidic soil under wheat-maize cropping system.在小麦-玉米种植体系下,石灰和长期施肥的相互作用通过调节酸性土壤中的可交换阳离子,增加了作物产量和磷利用效率(PUE)。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 13;10(1):19828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76892-8.
9
[Effects of fertilizer of calcium silicon magnesium potassium on the dynamics of soil acidity and exchangeable base cation in paddy field of southern China].钙硅镁钾肥对南方稻田土壤酸度及交换性盐基离子动态的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Feb 20;30(2):583-592. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201902.024.
10
Amelioration of an Ultisol profile acidity using crop straws combined with alkaline slag.利用作物秸秆与碱性炉渣改良赤红壤酸度。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jul;22(13):9965-75. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4176-5. Epub 2015 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental controls on soil pH in planted forest and its response to nitrogen deposition.人工林土壤 pH 值的环境控制及其对氮沉降的响应。
Environ Res. 2019 May;172:159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
2
Aluminum, a Friend or Foe of Higher Plants in Acid Soils.铝,酸性土壤中高等植物的朋友还是敌人?
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Oct 12;8:1767. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01767. eCollection 2017.
3
Soil acidification and the importance of liming agricultural soils with particular reference to the United Kingdom.
土壤酸化以及农业土壤施用石灰的重要性——以英国为例
Soil Use Manag. 2016 Sep;32(3):390-399. doi: 10.1111/sum.12270. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
4
Proximal gamma-ray spectroscopy to predict soil properties using windows and full-spectrum analysis methods.利用窗口和全谱分析方法进行近γ射线光谱预测土壤特性。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Nov 27;13(12):16263-80. doi: 10.3390/s131216263.
5
Aluminum stress signaling in plants.植物中的铝胁迫信号传导
Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Jul;4(7):592-7. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.7.8903. Epub 2009 Jul 28.