Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563003, Guizhou Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar 14;29(10):1614-1626. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i10.1614.
Programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors have been approved as second-line treatment regimen in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but it is still worth studying whether patients can benefit from PD-1 inhibitors as first-line drugs combined with targeted drugs and locoregional therapy.
To estimate the clinical outcome of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for patients with unresectable HCC (uHCC).
We carried out retrospective research of 65 patients with uHCC who were treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from September 2017 to February 2022. 45 patients received the PD-1 inhibitors, lenvatinib, TACE (PD-1-Lenv-T) therapy, and 20 received the lenvatinib, TACE (Lenv-T) therapy. In terms of the dose of lenvatinib, 8 mg was given orally for patients weighing less than 60 kg and 12 mg for those weighing more than 60 kg. Of the patients in the PD-1 inhibitor combination group, 15 received Toripalimab, 14 received Toripalimab, 14 received Camrelizumab, 4 received Pembrolizumab, 9 received Sintilimab, and 2 received Nivolumab, 1 with Tislelizumab. According to the investigators' assessment, TACE was performed every 4-6 wk when the patient had good hepatic function (Child-Pugh class A or B) until disease progression occurred. We evaluated the efficacy by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST criteria). We accessd the safety by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v 5.0. The key adverse events (AEs) after the initiation of combination therapy were observed.
Patients with uHCC who received PD-1-Lenv-T therapy ( = 45) had a clearly longer overall survival than those who underwent Lenv-T therapy ( = 20, 26.8 14.0 mo; = 0.027). The median progression-free survival time between the two treatment regimens was also measured {11.7 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.7-15.7] in the PD-1-Lenv-T group 8.5 mo (95%CI: 3.0-13.9) in the Lenv-T group ( = 0.028)}. The objective response rates of the PD-1-Lenv-T group and Lenv-T group were 44.4% and 20% ( = 0.059) according to the mRECIST criteria, meanwhile the disease control rates were 93.3% and 64.0% ( = 0.003), respectively. The type and frequency of AEs showed little distinction between patients received the two treatment regimens.
Our results suggest that the early combination of PD-1 inhibitors has manageable toxicity and hopeful efficacy in patients with uHCC.
程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)抑制剂已被批准作为肝细胞癌(HCC)的二线治疗方案,但仍值得研究 PD-1 抑制剂是否可作为一线药物联合靶向药物和局部区域治疗为不可切除 HCC(uHCC)患者带来获益。
评估经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合仑伐替尼和 PD-1 抑制剂治疗不可切除 HCC(uHCC)患者的临床结局。
我们对 2017 年 9 月至 2022 年 2 月在北京协和医院接受治疗的 65 例 uHCC 患者进行了回顾性研究。45 例患者接受了 PD-1 抑制剂、仑伐替尼和 TACE(PD-1-Lenv-T)治疗,20 例患者接受了仑伐替尼和 TACE(Lenv-T)治疗。仑伐替尼的剂量为:体重<60kg 的患者给予 8mg 口服,体重>60kg 的患者给予 12mg 口服。在 PD-1 抑制剂联合组中,15 例患者接受特瑞普利单抗治疗,14 例患者接受替雷利珠单抗治疗,14 例患者接受卡瑞利珠单抗治疗,4 例患者接受帕博利珠单抗治疗,9 例患者接受信迪利单抗治疗,2 例患者接受替雷利珠单抗治疗。根据研究者评估,当患者肝功能良好(Child-Pugh 分级 A 或 B)时,每 4-6 周进行一次 TACE,直至疾病进展。我们使用改良的实体瘤反应评价标准(mRECIST 标准)评估疗效。我们使用国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(第 5.0 版)评估安全性。观察联合治疗开始后关键不良事件(AE)的发生情况。
接受 PD-1-Lenv-T 治疗的 uHCC 患者(n=45)的总生存期明显长于接受 Lenv-T 治疗的患者(n=20,26.8 14.0 个月; =0.027)。两种治疗方案的中位无进展生存期也有所不同[PD-1-Lenv-T 组为 11.7 个月(95%置信区间:7.7-15.7),Lenv-T 组为 8.5 个月(95%置信区间:3.0-13.9); =0.028]。根据 mRECIST 标准,PD-1-Lenv-T 组和 Lenv-T 组的客观缓解率分别为 44.4%和 20%( =0.059),疾病控制率分别为 93.3%和 64.0%( =0.003)。两组患者的 AE 类型和发生频率无明显差异。
我们的结果表明,早期联合使用 PD-1 抑制剂治疗不可切除 HCC 患者具有可管理的毒性和有希望的疗效。