• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类图表要点与大语言模型预测的契合度如何?关于具有不同布局的柱状图的案例研究。

How Aligned are Human Chart Takeaways and LLM Predictions? A Case Study on Bar Charts with Varying Layouts.

作者信息

Wang Huichen Will, Hoffswell Jane, Thazin Thane Sao Myat, Bursztyn Victor S, Bearfield Cindy Xiong

出版信息

IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2025 Jan;31(1):536-546. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456378. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456378
PMID:39283799
Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been adopted for a variety of visualizations tasks, but how far are we from perceptually aware LLMs that can predict human takeaways? Graphical perception literature has shown that human chart takeaways are sensitive to visualization design choices, such as spatial layouts. In this work, we examine the extent to which LLMs exhibit such sensitivity when generating takeaways, using bar charts with varying spatial layouts as a case study. We conducted three experiments and tested four common bar chart layouts: vertically juxtaposed, horizontally juxtaposed, overlaid, and stacked. In Experiment 1, we identified the optimal configurations to generate meaningful chart takeaways by testing four LLMs, two temperature settings, nine chart specifications, and two prompting strategies. We found that even state-of-the-art LLMs struggled to generate semantically diverse and factually accurate takeaways. In Experiment 2, we used the optimal configurations to generate 30 chart takeaways each for eight visualizations across four layouts and two datasets in both zero-shot and one-shot settings. Compared to human takeaways, we found that the takeaways LLMs generated often did not match the types of comparisons made by humans. In Experiment 3, we examined the effect of chart context and data on LLM takeaways. We found that LLMs, unlike humans, exhibited variation in takeaway comparison types for different bar charts using the same bar layout. Overall, our case study evaluates the ability of LLMs to emulate human interpretations of data and points to challenges and opportunities in using LLMs to predict human chart takeaways.

摘要

大语言模型(LLMs)已被应用于各种可视化任务,但我们距离能够预测人类解读内容的具有感知能力的大语言模型还有多远呢?图形感知文献表明,人类对图表的解读对可视化设计选择很敏感,比如空间布局。在这项工作中,我们以具有不同空间布局的柱状图为案例研究,考察大语言模型在生成解读内容时表现出这种敏感性的程度。我们进行了三项实验,并测试了四种常见的柱状图布局:垂直并列、水平并列、叠加和堆叠。在实验1中,我们通过测试四个大语言模型、两种温度设置、九种图表规格和两种提示策略,确定了生成有意义的图表解读内容的最佳配置。我们发现,即使是最先进的大语言模型也难以生成语义多样且事实准确的解读内容。在实验2中,我们使用最佳配置在零样本和一样本设置下为四种布局和两个数据集中的八个可视化分别生成30个图表解读内容。与人类的解读内容相比,我们发现大语言模型生成的解读内容往往与人类进行的比较类型不匹配。在实验3中,我们考察了图表上下文和数据对大语言模型解读内容的影响。我们发现,与人类不同,大语言模型对于使用相同柱状布局的不同柱状图,在解读内容比较类型上表现出差异。总体而言,我们的案例研究评估了大语言模型模仿人类对数据的解读的能力,并指出了使用大语言模型预测人类图表解读内容方面的挑战和机遇。

相似文献

1
How Aligned are Human Chart Takeaways and LLM Predictions? A Case Study on Bar Charts with Varying Layouts.人类图表要点与大语言模型预测的契合度如何?关于具有不同布局的柱状图的案例研究。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2025 Jan;31(1):536-546. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456378. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Visual Arrangements of Bar Charts Influence Comparisons in Viewer Takeaways.柱形图的视觉排列会影响读者的理解。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2022 Jan;28(1):955-965. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114823. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
3
How Good (Or Bad) Are LLMs at Detecting Misleading Visualizations?大语言模型在检测误导性可视化方面的表现如何(或有多差)?
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2025 Jan;31(1):1116-1125. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456333. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
4
Four Experiments on the Perception of Bar Charts.四项关于条形图感知的实验。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2014 Dec;20(12):2152-60. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346320.
5
Evaluating large language models for health-related text classification tasks with public social media data.利用公共社交媒体数据评估用于健康相关文本分类任务的大型语言模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2181-2189. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae210.
6
Generative Large Language Models in Electronic Health Records for Patient Care Since 2023: A Systematic Review.2023年以来电子健康记录中用于患者护理的生成式大语言模型:一项系统综述
medRxiv. 2024 Aug 19:2024.08.11.24311828. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.11.24311828.
7
On the role of the UMLS in supporting diagnosis generation proposed by Large Language Models.在支持大型语言模型提出的诊断生成中 UMLS 的作用。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104707. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104707. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
8
Evaluating the positive predictive value of code-based identification of cirrhosis and its complications utilizing GPT-4.利用GPT-4评估基于代码的肝硬化及其并发症识别的阳性预测值。
Hepatology. 2025 Jun 1;81(6):1753-1763. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001115. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
9
A comprehensive evaluation of large Language models on benchmark biomedical text processing tasks.对基准生物医学文本处理任务中大型语言模型的全面评估。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Mar;171:108189. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108189. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
10
An Empirical Evaluation of Prompting Strategies for Large Language Models in Zero-Shot Clinical Natural Language Processing: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.零样本临床自然语言处理中大型语言模型提示策略的实证评估:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Apr 8;12:e55318. doi: 10.2196/55318.