Suppr超能文献

对实用解释连续体指标总结-2设计工具的评论、建议及批评:一项引文分析

Comments, suggestions, and criticisms of the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 design tool: a citation analysis.

作者信息

Willis Andrew, Shiely Frances, Treweek Shaun, Taljaard Monica, Loudon Kirsty, Howie Alison, Zwarenstein Merrick

机构信息

HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;176:111534. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111534. Epub 2024 Sep 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The pragmatic explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS) tool, initially published in 2009 and revised in 2015, was created to assist trialists to align their design choices with the intended purpose of their randomised controlled trial (RCT): either to guide real-world decisions between alternative interventions (pragmatic) or to test hypotheses about intervention mechanisms by minimising sources of variation (explanatory). There have been many comments, suggestions, and criticisms of PRECIS-2. This summary will be used to facilitate the development of to the next revision, which is PRECIS-3.

METHODS

We used Web of Science to identify all publication types citing PRECIS-2, published between May 2015 and July 2023. Citations were eligible if they contained 'substantive' suggestions, comments, or criticism of the PRECIS-2 tool. We defined 'substantive' as comments explicitly referencing at least one PRECIS-2 domain or a concept directly linked to an existing or newly proposed domain. Two reviewers independently extracted comments, suggestions, and criticisms, noting their implications for the update. These were discussed among authors to achieve consensus on the interpretation of each comment and its implications for PRECIS-3.

RESULTS

The search yielded 885 publications, and after full-text review, 89 articles met the inclusion criteria. Comments pertained to new domains, changes in existing domains, or were relevant across several or all domains. Proposed new domains included assessment of the comparator arm and a domain to describe blinding. There were concerns about scoring eligibility and recruitment domains for cluster trials. Suggested areas for improvement across domains included the need for more scoring guidance for explanatory design choices.

DISCUSSION

Published comments recognise PRECIS-2's success in aiding trialists with pragmatic or explanatory design choices. Enhancing its implementation and widespread use will involve adding new domains, refining domain definitions, and addressing overall tool issues. This citation review offers valuable user feedback, pivotal for shaping the upcoming version of the PRECIS tool, PRECIS-3.

摘要

引言

实用解释性连续体指标总结(PRECIS)工具最初于2009年发布,并于2015年修订,旨在帮助试验者使他们的设计选择与随机对照试验(RCT)的预期目的保持一致:要么指导在替代干预措施之间做出实际决策(实用型),要么通过最小化变异来源来检验关于干预机制的假设(解释型)。关于PRECIS-2有许多评论、建议和批评。本总结将用于促进下一版即PRECIS-3的修订。

方法

我们使用科学网来识别2015年5月至2023年7月期间引用PRECIS-2的所有出版物类型。如果引用包含对PRECIS-2工具的“实质性”建议、评论或批评,则这些引用符合条件。我们将“实质性”定义为明确提及至少一个PRECIS-2领域或与现有或新提出领域直接相关概念的评论。两名评审员独立提取评论、建议和批评,并指出它们对更新的影响。作者们对这些内容进行了讨论,以就每条评论的解释及其对PRECIS-3的影响达成共识。

结果

检索得到885篇出版物,经过全文审查,89篇文章符合纳入标准。评论涉及新领域、现有领域的变化,或与几个或所有领域相关。提议的新领域包括对照臂评估和一个描述盲法的领域。对于整群试验的评分资格和招募领域存在担忧。各领域建议改进的方面包括需要为解释性设计选择提供更多评分指导。

讨论

已发表的评论认可PRECIS-2在帮助试验者进行实用型或解释型设计选择方面的成功。加强其实施和广泛使用将涉及增加新领域、完善领域定义以及解决工具的整体问题。本次引用综述提供了宝贵的用户反馈,这对塑造PRECIS工具的下一版本PRECIS-3至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验