• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国大学生精英运动员中文失败量表的信效度评估与测试

Evaluation and test of the reliability and validity of the Chinese defeat scale in the elite athletes of Chinese universities.

作者信息

Li Tao, Liu Yameng

机构信息

Physical Education Teaching and Research Section, Cangzhou Jiaotong College, Hebei, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 12;14(1):21347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69952-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-69952-w
PMID:39284866
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11405387/
Abstract

To test the reliability and validity of the "Defeat Scale" and explore whether the scale is suitable for use in surveys of college athletes. A total of 226 athletes from five universities in China were selected for evaluation using the defeat scale. Factor analysis and correlation analysis were used to explore the reliability and validity of the defeat scale. Exploratory factor analysis showed that two factors could be extracted from this scale, namely a sense of decadence and a sense of low achievement. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit of the two factors was excellent (X/DF = 2.809, RMSEA = 0.092, SRMR = 0.054, NFI = 0.891, IFI = 0.927, CFI = 0.926, GFI = 0.919, TLI = 0.910) . The convergent validity AVE values are 0.579 and 0.505 respectively, AVE > 0.5, and the combined reliability is 0.946 and 0.746 respectively. Both > 0.7 indicate good convergence effect. The arithmetic square roots of AVE, 0.760 and 0.710, are both higher than the absolute value of the correlation coefficient between the two dimensions, 0.30, indicating good discriminant validity; and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of defeat is 0.931, and the Spearman-Brown coefficient is 0.888. The defeat scale has good reliability and validity among college athletes.

摘要

为检验“挫败感量表”的信效度,并探讨该量表是否适用于大学生运动员的调查。选取了中国五所大学的226名运动员使用挫败感量表进行测评。采用因素分析和相关分析来探讨挫败感量表的信效度。探索性因素分析表明,该量表可提取出两个因素,即颓废感和低成就感。验证性因素分析表明,这两个因素的模型拟合良好(X/DF = 2.809,RMSEA = 0.092,SRMR = 0.054,NFI = 0.891,IFI = 0.927,CFI = 0.926,GFI = 0.919,TLI = 0.910)。收敛效度AVE值分别为0.579和0.505,AVE > 0.5,组合信度分别为0.946和0.746,均> 0.7,表明收敛效果良好。AVE的算术平方根0.760和0.710均高于两个维度间相关系数的绝对值0.30,表明判别效度良好;且挫败感量表的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.931,Spearman-Brown系数为0.888。挫败感量表在大学生运动员中具有良好的信效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/247a/11405387/51a226ba869d/41598_2024_69952_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/247a/11405387/4e51d820f5d5/41598_2024_69952_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/247a/11405387/059c6d7bc667/41598_2024_69952_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/247a/11405387/51a226ba869d/41598_2024_69952_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/247a/11405387/4e51d820f5d5/41598_2024_69952_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/247a/11405387/059c6d7bc667/41598_2024_69952_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/247a/11405387/51a226ba869d/41598_2024_69952_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation and test of the reliability and validity of the Chinese defeat scale in the elite athletes of Chinese universities.中国大学生精英运动员中文失败量表的信效度评估与测试
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 12;14(1):21347. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69952-w.
2
Brief adult respiratory system health status scale-community version (BARSHSS-CV): developing and evaluating the reliability and validity.简易成人呼吸系统健康状况量表-社区版(BARSHSS-CV):信效度的开发与评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3505-z.
3
Development and validation of a maternal anxiety for neonatal jaundice scale in China.中国新生儿黄疸母亲焦虑量表的编制与验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):526. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04161-1.
4
Reliability and validity of the short version of the childhood abuse self report scale in Chinese college students.中文版儿童虐待自我报告量表短式的信度和效度。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 8;12(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01734-5.
5
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the mental vulnerability questionnaire for the undergraduate students.《大学生心理脆弱问卷》中文版的信度和效度。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2020 Apr;56(2):409-414. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12449. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
6
Reliability and validity study of the Thai adaptation of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (CBI-SS) among preclinical medical students at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.泰国玛希隆大学诗里拉吉医院医学院预科医学生使用哥本哈根倦怠量表学生调查(CBI-SS)的泰语适应性可靠性和有效性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 30;16(12):e0261887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261887. eCollection 2021.
7
Translation and psychometric evaluation of Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) among Chinese college students.中文大学生智能手机成瘾量表短版(SAS-SV)的翻译与心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 29;17(11):e0278092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278092. eCollection 2022.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Defeat Scale among Internal Migrant Workers in China: Decadence and Low Sense of Achievement.中国农民工颓废感与低成就感量表的信效度研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 7;11(6):781. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060781.
9
Developing and validating a Domain-specific Grit Scale for College Athletic Students.开发和验证用于高校体育学生的领域特定坚毅量表。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 24;14(1):11897. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62771-z.
10
Development of Chinese college students' perception teacher differential behavior scale and its reliability and validity test.发展中国大学生感知教师差异化行为量表及其信度和效度检验。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 12;12(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01973-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Suicide in National Collegiate Athletic Association athletes: a 20-year analysis.美国大学生体育协会运动员中的自杀情况:一项为期20年的分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2024 May 2;58(10):531-537. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107509.
2
Validation of the Transpersonal Gratitude Scale (TGS) and the Relationship between Transpersonal Gratitude, Spiritual Well-Being and Distress in India.验证超个人感恩量表(TGS)以及超个人感恩、精神幸福感与困扰在印度的关系。
J Relig Health. 2023 Oct;62(5):3604-3621. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01811-w. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
3
Three-item loneliness scale: Exploring the psychometric properties in the Indian context.
三项孤独量表:在印度背景下探索其心理测量特性
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Feb;80:103323. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103323. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
4
Social rank theory of depression: A systematic review of self-perceptions of social rank and their relationship with depressive symptoms and suicide risk.抑郁的社会等级理论:自我感知社会等级及其与抑郁症状和自杀风险关系的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:300-319. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.045. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
5
The Reliability and Validity of the Religious Health Fatalism Scale in Turkish Language.《宗教健康宿命论量表在土耳其语中的信度和效度》
J Relig Health. 2020 Apr;59(2):1080-1095. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0731-y.
6
The integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behaviour.自杀行为的综合动机-意志模型。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 5;373(1754). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0268.
7
["Defeated by Life" - Validation of a German Version of the Defeat Scale (DS-d)].["被生活击败”——德文版失败量表(DS-d)的验证]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018 Jul;68(7):300-308. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-107027. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
Adolescent depression, adult mental health and psychosocial outcomes at 30 and 35 years.青少年抑郁症、成人心理健康状况以及30岁和35岁时的心理社会结局
Psychol Med. 2016 May;46(7):1401-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002950. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
9
The development of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES).简短失败与诱捕量表(SDES)的开发。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1182-94. doi: 10.1037/pas0000110. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
10
Increased mortality rate and suicide in Swedish former elite male athletes in power sports.瑞典前精英男子力量型运动员的死亡率和自杀率上升。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Dec;24(6):1000-5. doi: 10.1111/sms.12122. Epub 2013 Sep 12.