• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用邮寄问卷而非电子问卷可提高应答率——Cochrane 系统评价更新的新结果。

Response is increased using postal rather than electronic questionnaires - new results from an updated Cochrane Systematic Review.

机构信息

Data Collection Methodology Group, Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02332-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02332-0
PMID:39285263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11403848/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A decade ago paper questionnaires were more common in epidemiology than those administered online, but increasing Internet access may have changed this. Researchers planning to use a self-administered questionnaire should know whether response rates to questionnaires administered electronically differ to those of questionnaires administered by post. We analysed trials included in a recently updated Cochrane Review to answer this question.

METHODS

We exported data of randomised controlled trials included in three comparisons in the Cochrane Review that had evaluated hypotheses relevant to our research objective and imported them into Stata for a series of meta-analyses not conducted in the Cochrane review. We pooled odds ratios for response using random effects meta-analyses. We explored causes of heterogeneity among study results using subgroups. We assessed evidence for reporting bias using Harbord's modified test for small-study effects.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven trials (66,118 participants) evaluated the effect on response of an electronic questionnaire compared with postal. Results were heterogeneous (I-squared = 98%). There was evidence for biased (greater) effect estimates in studies at high risk of bias; A synthesis of studies at low risk of bias indicates that response was increased (OR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.08-1.89) using postal questionnaires. Ten trials (39,523 participants) evaluated the effect of providing a choice of mode (postal or electronic) compared to an electronic questionnaire only. Response was increased with a choice of mode (OR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.18-2.26). Eight trials (20,909 participants) evaluated the effect of a choice of mode (electronic or postal) compared to a postal questionnaire only. There was no evidence for an effect on response of a choice of mode compared with postal only (OR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.86-1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Postal questionnaires should be used in preference to, or offered in addition to, electronic modes.

摘要

背景

十年前,在流行病学中,纸质问卷比在线问卷更为常见,但互联网的普及可能改变了这种情况。研究人员在计划使用自填式问卷时,应了解电子问卷的回复率与邮寄问卷的回复率是否不同。我们分析了最近更新的 Cochrane 综述中包含的试验,以回答这个问题。

方法

我们从 Cochrane 综述中包含的三项比较中导出了评估与我们研究目标相关假设的随机对照试验的数据,并将其导入 Stata 进行一系列 Cochrane 综述中未进行的荟萃分析。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总了反应的优势比。我们通过亚组探索研究结果异质性的原因。我们使用 Harbord 修正的小样本效应检验评估报告偏倚的证据。

结果

27 项试验(66118 名参与者)评估了电子问卷与邮寄问卷对反应的影响。结果存在异质性(I-squared=98%)。在高偏倚风险的研究中,存在偏倚(更大)效应估计的证据;在低偏倚风险的研究综合分析中,使用邮寄问卷时,反应增加(OR=1.43;95%CI 1.08-1.89)。10 项试验(39523 名参与者)评估了提供模式选择(邮寄或电子)与仅电子问卷相比对反应的影响。模式选择增加了反应(OR=1.63;95%CI 1.18-2.26)。8 项试验(20909 名参与者)评估了模式选择(电子或邮寄)与仅邮寄问卷相比对反应的影响。与仅邮寄问卷相比,模式选择对反应没有影响(OR=0.94;95%CI 0.86-1.02)。

结论

应优先使用邮寄问卷,或在提供电子模式的基础上,额外提供邮寄问卷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3bf/11403848/8a76b2570302/12874_2024_2332_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3bf/11403848/885e98308167/12874_2024_2332_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3bf/11403848/62ed306e275d/12874_2024_2332_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3bf/11403848/8a76b2570302/12874_2024_2332_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3bf/11403848/885e98308167/12874_2024_2332_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3bf/11403848/62ed306e275d/12874_2024_2332_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3bf/11403848/8a76b2570302/12874_2024_2332_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Response is increased using postal rather than electronic questionnaires - new results from an updated Cochrane Systematic Review.使用邮寄问卷而非电子问卷可提高应答率——Cochrane 系统评价更新的新结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02332-0.
2
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
3
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.提高对邮寄问卷和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.一项关于使用患者乳腺护理体验问卷的邮寄调查与混合模式调查的比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 27;13(3):e68. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1241.
6
Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.提高邮寄问卷调查回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub3.
7
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.提高随机试验中保留率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 3(12):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub2.
8
The influence of response mode on study results: offering cigarette smokers a choice of postal or online completion of a survey.应答方式对研究结果的影响:为吸烟者提供邮寄或在线完成调查问卷的选择。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Oct 21;12(4):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1414.
9
SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.在SUSPEND试验中,通过短信预通知和发送提醒电子邮件来提高邮寄问卷的回复率:析因设计随机对照试验
Trials. 2015 Jul 8;16:295. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0808-9.
10
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
2
Patient-reported experiences with general practitioners: a randomised study of mail and web-based approaches following a national survey.患者报告的全科医生就医体验:一项在全国性调查之后对邮寄和基于网络的方法进行的随机研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 13;10(10):e036533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036533.
3
A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual.
一项关于临床试验入组的医师调查的邮件和电子邮件招募策略的随机试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 19;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01014-x.
4
The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures.网络调查获取癌症幸存者患者报告结局的可行性:比较调查模式和宣传册附函的随机试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0859-9.
5
The impact of survey mode on the response rate in a survey of the factors that influence Minnesota physicians' disclosure practices.调查模式对影响明尼苏达州医生披露实践因素调查中响应率的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0719-7.
6
The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: A comparison of mail and web-based approaches.管理模式对 CAHPS 调查应答率和结果的影响:邮件和网络方法的比较。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun;54(3):714-721. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13109. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
7
Use of In-Game Rewards to Motivate Daily Self-Report Compliance: Randomized Controlled Trial.使用游戏内奖励激励每日自我报告依从性:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 3;21(1):e11683. doi: 10.2196/11683.
8
A randomized comparison of three data collection models for the measurement of parent experiences with diabetes outpatient care.三种数据收集模型用于测量家长在糖尿病门诊护理方面的体验的随机比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Sep 20;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0557-z.
9
Mode Equivalence of Health Indicators Between Data Collection Modes and Mixed-Mode Survey Designs in Population-Based Health Interview Surveys for Children and Adolescents: Methodological Study.基于人群的儿童和青少年健康访谈调查中数据收集模式与混合模式调查设计之间健康指标的模式等效性:方法学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 5;20(3):e64. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7802.
10
Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)?试验构建指南1:试验中的研究(SWAT)是什么?
Trials. 2018 Feb 23;19(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2535-5.