Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Crit Care. 2024 Sep 16;28(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05097-6.
The superimposed pressure is the primary determinant of the pleural pressure gradient. Obesity is associated with elevated end-expiratory esophageal pressure, regardless of lung disease severity, and the superimposed pressure might not be the only determinant of the pleural pressure gradient. The study aims to measure partitioned respiratory mechanics and superimposed pressure in a cohort of patients admitted to the ICU with and without class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m), and to quantify the amount of thoracic adipose tissue and muscle through advanced imaging techniques.
This is a single-center observational study including ICU-admitted patients with acute respiratory failure who underwent a chest computed tomography scan within three days before/after esophageal manometry. The superimposed pressure was calculated from lung density and height of the largest axial lung slice. Automated deep-learning pipelines segmented lung parenchyma and quantified thoracic adipose tissue and skeletal muscle.
N = 18 participants (50% female, age 60 [30-66] years), with 9 having BMI < 30 and 9 ≥ 40 kg/m. Groups showed no significant differences in age, sex, clinical severity scores, or mortality. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 exhibited higher esophageal pressure (15.8 ± 2.6 vs. 8.3 ± 4.9 cmHO, p = 0.001), higher pleural pressure gradient (11.1 ± 4.5 vs. 6.3 ± 4.9 cmHO, p = 0.04), while superimposed pressure did not differ (6.8 ± 1.1 vs. 6.5 ± 1.5 cmHO, p = 0.59). Subcutaneous and intrathoracic adipose tissue were significantly higher in subjects with BMI ≥ 40 and correlated positively with esophageal pressure and pleural pressure gradient (p < 0.05). Muscle areas did not differ between groups.
In patients with class III obesity, the superimposed pressure does not approximate the pleural pressure gradient, which is higher than in patients with lower BMI. The quantity and distribution of subcutaneous and intrathoracic adiposity also contribute to increased pleural pressure gradients in individuals with BMI ≥ 40. This study introduces a novel physiological concept that provides a solid rationale for tailoring mechanical ventilation in patients with high BMI, where specific guidelines recommendations are lacking.
叠加压力是胸膜压力梯度的主要决定因素。肥胖与呼气末食管压力升高有关,无论肺部疾病的严重程度如何,叠加压力可能不是胸膜压力梯度的唯一决定因素。本研究旨在测量一组因急性呼吸衰竭入住 ICU 的患者的分区呼吸力学和叠加压力,这些患者分为有(BMI≥40kg/m)和无肥胖症(BMI<30kg/m)。并通过先进的成像技术来量化胸内脂肪组织和肌肉的量。
这是一项单中心观察性研究,包括因急性呼吸衰竭入住 ICU 的患者,这些患者在食管测压前/后三天内接受胸部计算机断层扫描。叠加压力是通过肺密度和最大轴向肺切片的高度计算出来的。自动化深度学习管道分割肺实质,并量化胸内脂肪组织和骨骼肌。
共有 18 名参与者(50%为女性,年龄 60[30-66]岁),其中 9 名 BMI<30kg/m,9 名 BMI≥40kg/m。两组在年龄、性别、临床严重程度评分或死亡率方面没有显著差异。BMI≥40kg/m 的患者食管压力较高(15.8±2.6 vs. 8.3±4.9cmHO,p=0.001),胸膜压力梯度较高(11.1±4.5 vs. 6.3±4.9cmHO,p=0.04),而叠加压力没有差异(6.8±1.1 vs. 6.5±1.5cmHO,p=0.59)。BMI≥40kg/m 的患者皮下和胸内脂肪组织明显更高,与食管压力和胸膜压力梯度呈正相关(p<0.05)。两组间肌肉面积无差异。
在 BMI 为 III 级肥胖的患者中,叠加压力不能近似胸膜压力梯度,其高于 BMI 较低的患者。皮下和胸内脂肪的数量和分布也会导致 BMI≥40kg/m 的个体胸膜压力梯度增加。本研究提出了一个新的生理概念,为高 BMI 患者的机械通气提供了合理的依据,因为目前缺乏针对这一人群的具体指南建议。