Orthopedic Sports Medicine Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Beijing MEDERA Medical Group, Beijing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Sep 13;103(37):e39528. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039528.
In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the positioning of components holds critical importance for factors such as joint stability, polyethylene liner wear, and range of motion. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of intraoperative fluoroscopy (IF) versus no use of IF on component positioning and the restoration of patient anatomy during THA.
We conducted our systematic review following the recommendations outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The literature search was performed from the inception of medical databases up to August 2023. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM), and China Science and Technology Journal (CSTD) databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies comparing IF versus no IF during primary THA.
Thirteen studies involving 2195 patients (2207 hips) were incorporated in the Analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of acetabular cup inclination angle (ACIA, P = .9), ACIA within the safe zone rate (P = .87), acetabular cup anteversion angle (ACAA, P = .42), ACAA within the safe zone rate (P = .35), combined safe zone rate (P = .30), limb length difference (LLD, P = .13), dislocation rate (P = .76), and infection rate (P = .97). In comparison to the no fluoroscopy group, the IF group exhibited prolonged operation time (P < .00001) and reduced femoral component offset difference (FCOD, P = .03).
IF did not demonstrate improvements in acetabular cup placement, limb length difference, or dislocation occurrence. Nonetheless, IF showed a significant enhancement in restoring femoral offset. It is noteworthy that surgeons operating in facilities with lower patient volumes may observe more pronounced benefits from IF.
在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,假体的定位对于关节稳定性、聚乙烯衬垫磨损和活动范围等因素至关重要。本项荟萃分析旨在比较术中透视(IF)与不使用 IF 对 THA 中假体定位和患者解剖结构恢复的影响。
我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南的建议进行了系统评价。文献检索从医学数据库建立开始到 2023 年 8 月进行。系统检索 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 对照试验登记处、Cochrane 图书馆、Highwire、万方、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和中国科技期刊数据库(CSTD)以确定比较初次 THA 中 IF 与不 IF 的相关研究。
共纳入 13 项研究,涉及 2195 例患者(2207 髋)。在髋臼杯倾斜角(ACIA,P=0.9)、髋臼杯在安全区的比率(P=0.87)、髋臼杯前倾角(ACAA,P=0.42)、髋臼杯在安全区的比率(P=0.35)、联合安全区的比率(P=0.30)、肢体长度差异(LLD,P=0.13)、脱位率(P=0.76)和感染率(P=0.97)方面,两组间无统计学差异。与无透视组相比,IF 组手术时间延长(P<0.00001),股骨组件偏距差(FCOD,P=0.03)减小。
IF 并未改善髋臼杯放置、肢体长度差异或脱位发生情况。尽管如此,IF 确实显著改善了股骨偏距的恢复。值得注意的是,在患者数量较少的医疗机构中手术的外科医生可能会从 IF 中获得更显著的收益。