Pediatric intensive care unit - Children's hospital Béchir Hamza of Tunis- Faculty of Medicine of Tunis-University of Tunis of EL-Manar- Tunisia.
Tunis Med. 2024 Sep 5;102(9):565-570. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i9.5095.
To evaluate the agreement of cardiac index (CI) calculated by Ultrasonic sonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) and transthoracic thoracic echocardiography (TTE) in order to know if we can recommend USCOM in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Prospective observational evaluative study carried out over a period of 3 months Setting: PICU at children's hospital in Tunis Participants: All newborns without tracheostomy or a known congenital heart disease, admitted to the PICU during the study period were enrolled.
Paired and consecutive measurements of CI were obtained in all patients with both technologies. All measurements by TTE and USCOM were performed by two distinct operators. It is the average of three successive measures of the CI, in the same patient, with each technology, which was considered. Agreement of CI between the 2 techniques was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and percentage error.
Forty-two infants were analyzed with the mean (standard deviation) gestation 36 weeks ( 5 days), age 1 days (1.09) , and weight 2.9 kg (0.87). Respiratory failure was the main cause of admission 75%. At the time of the study, 33 (75.%) patients were ventilated artificially. Bias (mean difference) of the CI between the two methods was 1.2 l/min/m2 and precision (± 2 SD of differences) was 1.08 l/min/m2. The MPE of CI measurement for USCOM vs TTE was 54.9%.
The USCOM showed a poor agreement to TTE measures of CI. The two methods cannot be considered interchangeable.
评估超声心输出量监测仪(USCOM)和经胸超声心动图(TTE)计算的心指数(CI)的一致性,以确定是否可以在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)推荐 USCOM。
前瞻性观察评估研究,持续 3 个月
突尼斯儿童医院的 PICU
研究期间收治的所有无气管造口术或已知先天性心脏病的新生儿均纳入本研究。
对所有患者同时使用两种技术进行 CI 的配对和连续测量。所有 TTE 和 USCOM 的测量均由两名不同的操作人员进行。每个技术的三次连续 CI 测量的平均值被认为是有效的。通过 Bland-Altman 分析和百分比误差评估两种技术的 CI 一致性。
共分析了 42 例婴儿,平均(标准差)胎龄为 36 周(5 天),年龄为 1 天(1.09),体重为 2.9 公斤(0.87)。呼吸衰竭是入院的主要原因,占 75%。在研究时,33 例(75%)患者接受人工通气。两种方法的 CI 之间的偏差(平均差值)为 1.2 l/min/m2,精度(差值的±2 SD)为 1.08 l/min/m2。USCOM 与 TTE 测量 CI 的 MPE 为 54.9%。
USCOM 与 TTE 测量 CI 的一致性较差。这两种方法不能互换使用。