RETINAL MIGRATION AND SURGICAL OUTCOME AFTER HEMI-TEMPORAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PEELING FOR MACULAR HOLE: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE

To investigate the anatomical changes and surgical outcomes of hemi-temporal internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and conventional ILM peeling for idiopathic macular hole (MH).

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 centers and included 50 participants with MHs of <400 µm in minimum diameter for a duration of <6 months. All participants had undergone vitrectomy with either hemi-temporal ILM peeling (Hemi group) or 360° ILM peeling (360° group) with an injection of 5% sulfur hexafluoride gas, with or without simultaneous cataract surgery, from July 2017 to January 2021. The rate of MH closure and distance of retinal migration were examined.

RESULTS

Of 50 eyes randomized in the 3 centers, the Hemi group comprised 23 eyes, the 360° group 23 eyes, and 4 eyes were eliminated from final analysis. There was a significantly higher rate of primary MH closure in the 360° group (Hemi group: 73.9% vs. 360° group: 100%, P = 0.009). Retinal migration to the optic disk on the nasal side was significantly shorter in the Hemi group at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively than in the 360° group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in retinal migration to the optic disk on the temporal side.

CONCLUSION

Nasal retinal migration in patients who underwent the hemi-temporal ILM peeling method was significantly less than in those who underwent the 360° ILM peeling method. However, less nasal retinal migration did not contribute to the MH closure rate.