Suppr超能文献

毒素 ELISA 和 C 和 D 基因 RT-PCR 辅助下的哺乳动物肉毒梭菌中毒诊断,重点是农场动物。

Diagnosis of botulism in mammals aided by toxin ELISA and C and D gene RT-PCRs with an emphasis on farm animals.

机构信息

Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Government of Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA, 6151, Australia.

出版信息

Vet Res Commun. 2024 Dec;48(6):3803-3812. doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10498-7. Epub 2024 Sep 17.

Abstract

Animal welfare and ethical considerations limit the use of the mouse lethality bioassay for the detection of botulinum toxins. This study assessed an ELISA and RT-PCRs to detect toxin types C and D in samples from mammals with flaccid paralysis or weakness. DNA/RNA tightly bound to the toxin molecules were used as surrogates for the presence of toxin. In total 391 diverse samples from 101 clinical cases from cattle and 9 other species were examined. Botulism was confirmed by ELISA in samples from 16 cases. Toxin type C or D was identified by RT-PCR in 10 cases, five of which were among the cases confirmed by ELISA. Among the 80 cases with negative samples, sampling was not comprehensive enough in 66 cases (botulism therefore not excluded) but was adequate in 14 cases (no indication of botulism). The last two categories included 16 cases with other laboratory findings explaining the clinical signs. The ELISA that detects botulinum C and D toxins was superior in identifying cases with positive samples compared to the RT-PCRs but the latter were able to identify the toxin type present when positive. Furthermore, the RT-PCRs are available to any laboratory with molecular testing capability. Both laboratory assays can screen a comprehensive range and a large number of samples which is crucial for a successful diagnosis of botulism.

摘要

动物福利和伦理考虑限制了使用小鼠致死性生物测定法来检测肉毒梭菌毒素。本研究评估了一种 ELISA 和 RT-PCR 方法,用于检测麻痹或虚弱的哺乳动物样本中的毒素类型 C 和 D。与毒素紧密结合的 DNA/RNA 被用作存在毒素的替代物。总共检查了来自 101 个牛和其他 9 个物种的 101 个临床病例的 391 个不同样本。ELISA 在 16 个病例的样本中证实了肉毒中毒。在 10 个病例中通过 RT-PCR 鉴定出毒素类型 C 或 D,其中 5 个病例在 ELISA 证实的病例中。在 80 个阴性样本的病例中,66 个病例的采样不够全面(因此不能排除肉毒中毒),但 14 个病例的采样足够(没有肉毒中毒的迹象)。最后两类包括 16 个病例有其他实验室发现解释了临床症状。与 RT-PCR 相比,检测肉毒梭菌 C 和 D 毒素的 ELISA 更能识别阳性样本中的病例,但后者能够识别阳性时存在的毒素类型。此外,任何具有分子检测能力的实验室都可以进行 RT-PCR。这两种实验室检测都可以筛选出广泛的范围和大量的样本,这对成功诊断肉毒中毒至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验