Harper Lorie M, Kuo Hui-Chien, Boggess Kim, Dugoff Lorraine, Sibai Baha, Lawrence Kirsten, Hughes Brenna L, Bell Joseph, Aagaard Kjersti, Edwards Rodney K, Gibson Kelly S, Haas David M, Plante Lauren, Metz Torri D, Casey Brian M, Esplin Sean, Longo Sherri, Hoffman Matthew, Saade George R, Hoppe Kara, Foroutan Janelle, Tuuli Methodius G, Owens Michelle Y, Simhan Hyagriv N, Frey Heather A, Rosen Todd, Palatnik Anna, August Phyllis, Reddy Uma M, Kinzler Wendy, Su Emily J, Krishna Iris, Nguyen Nguyet A, Norton Mary E, Skupski Daniel, El-Sayed Yasser Y, Galis Zorina S, Ambalavanan Namasivayam, Oparil Suzanne, Szychowski Jeff M, Tita Alan T N
Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May;232(5):482.e1-482.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.006. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy Study demonstrated that a target blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg during pregnancy is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Outside of pregnancy, pharmacologic therapy for patients with diabetes and hypertension is adjusted to a target blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg. During pregnancy, patients with both diabetes and chronic hypertension may also benefit from tighter control with a target blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg.
We compared perinatal outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes who achieved blood pressure <130/80 vs 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg.
This was a secondary analysis of a multcenter randomized controlled trial. Participants were included in this secondary analysis if they had diabetes diagnosed prior to pregnancy or at <20 weeks of gestation and at least 2 recorded blood pressure measurements prior to delivery. Average systolic and diastolic blood pressure were calculated using ambulatory antenatal blood pressures. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth <35 weeks, or placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome, cesarean delivery, fetal or neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and small for gestational age. Comparisons were made between those with an average systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg and average diastolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg and those with an average systolic blood pressure 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 80 to 89 mm Hg using Student's t test and chi-squared tests. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to evaluate risk ratios between blood pressure groups for dichotomous outcomes while accounting for baseline covariates.
Of 434 participants included, 150 (34.6%) had an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 were more likely to be on antihypertensive medications at the start of pregnancy and more likely to have newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus prior to 20 weeks. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg were less likely to have the primary adverse perinatal outcome (19.3% vs 46.5%, adjusted relative risk 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.61, P<.01), with decreased risks specifically of preeclampsia with severe features (adjusted relative risk 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.54) and indicated preterm birth prior to 35 weeks (adjusted relative risk 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.79). The risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.94). No differences were noted in cesarean delivery (adjusted relative risk 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.20), fetal or neonatal death (adjusted relative risk 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.12-2.92). Small for gestational age less than the 10th percentile was lower in the lower blood pressure group (adjusted relative risk 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.96).
In those with chronic hypertension and diabetes prior to 20 weeks, achieving an average goal blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg may be associated with improved perinatal outcomes.
慢性高血压与妊娠研究表明,孕期目标血压<140/90 mmHg与围产期结局改善相关。在非孕期,糖尿病和高血压患者的药物治疗目标血压调整为<130/80 mmHg。孕期,糖尿病合并慢性高血压患者可能也会从目标血压<130/80 mmHg的更严格控制中获益。
我们比较了血压<130/80 mmHg与130至139/80至89 mmHg的高血压合并糖尿病患者的围产期结局。
这是一项多中心随机对照试验的二次分析。如果参与者在妊娠前或妊娠<20周时被诊断为糖尿病,且在分娩前至少有2次记录的血压测量值,则纳入该二次分析。使用动态产前血压计算平均收缩压和舒张压。主要复合结局为伴有严重特征的子痫前期、孕周<35周的早产或胎盘早剥。次要结局为主要结局的组成部分、剖宫产、胎儿或新生儿死亡、新生儿重症监护病房入院以及小于胎龄儿。使用学生t检验和卡方检验对平均收缩压<130 mmHg且平均舒张压<80 mmHg的患者与平均收缩压130至139 mmHg或舒张压80至89 mmHg的患者进行比较。多变量对数二项回归模型用于评估二分结局的血压组之间的风险比,同时考虑基线协变量。
在纳入的434名参与者中,150名(34.6%)平均血压低于130/80 mmHg。平均血压低于13照0/80 mmHg的参与者在妊娠开始时更有可能服用抗高血压药物,且在20周前更有可能新诊断为糖尿病。平均血压低于130/80 mmHg的参与者发生主要不良围产期结局的可能性较小(19.3%对46.5%,调整后相对风险0.43,95%置信区间0.30 - 0.61,P<.01),特别是伴有严重特征的子痫前期风险降低(调整后相对风险0.35,95%置信区间0.23 - 0.54)以及孕周<35周的早产风险降低(调整后相对风险0.44,95%置信区间0.24 - 0.79)。较低血压组新生儿重症监护病房入院风险较低(调整后相对风险0.74,95%置信区间照0.59 - 0.94)。剖宫产(调整后相对风险1.04,95%置信区间0.90 - 1.20)、胎儿或新生儿死亡(调整后相对风险0.59,95%置信区间0.12 - 2.92)未发现差异。较低血压组小于胎龄儿且小于第10百分位数的情况较少(调整后相对风险0.37,95%置信区间0.14 - 0.96)。
在妊娠20周前患有慢性高血压和糖尿病患者中,实现平均目标血压<130/80 mmHg可能与围产期结局改善相关。