Kim Jungyoon, Wang Hongmei, Ma Jihyun, Jeffrey Daniel, Mohring Stephen, Recher April, Potter Jane F
Department of Health Services Research and Administration, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3104-3112. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08813-8. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
Health care systems are increasingly partnering with community-based organizations to address social determinants of health (SDH). We established a program that educates and connects patients with SDH needs at a primary care clinic to community services and facilitated referrals.
To evaluate the effect of addressing SDH soon after discharge on hospital readmission in a clinic population.
Pre/post, quasi-experimental design with longitudinal data analysis for quality improvement.
Clinic patients (n = 754) having at least one hospital discharge between June 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, were included. Of these, 145 patients received the intervention and 609 served as comparison.
A primary care liaison was employed to assess and educate recently discharged clinic patients for SDH needs and refer them for needed community services from June 1, 2020, to October 31, 2021.
Hospital readmissions within 30, 60, and 90 days of discharge were tracked at 6-month intervals. Covariates included patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, income, Hierarchical Condition Category risk scores, and Clinical Classification Software diagnosis groups. Data for all hospital discharges during the intervention period were used for the main analysis and data for the year before the intervention were extracted for comparison.
Overall, patients in the intervention group were older, sicker, and more likely to have public insurance. The reductions in 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmissions during the intervention period were 14.39%, 13.28%, and 12.04% respectively in the intervention group, while no significant change was observed in the comparison group. The group difference in reduction over time was statistically significant for 30-day (Diff = 12.54%; p = 0.032), 60-day (Diff = 14.40%; p = 0.012), and 90-day readmissions (Diff = 14.71%; p = 0.036).
Our findings suggest that screening clinic patients for SDH, and educating and connecting them to community services during post-hospital care may be associated with reductions in hospital readmissions.
医疗保健系统越来越多地与社区组织合作,以解决健康的社会决定因素(SDH)。我们建立了一个项目,该项目在初级保健诊所对有SDH需求的患者进行教育,并将他们与社区服务联系起来,同时促进转诊。
评估出院后不久解决SDH问题对诊所人群再次住院的影响。
前后对照、准实验设计,采用纵向数据分析以改进质量。
纳入了在2020年6月1日至2021年10月31日期间至少有一次出院记录的诊所患者(n = 754)。其中,145名患者接受了干预,609名患者作为对照。
从2020年6月1日至2021年10月31日,聘请一名初级保健联络人评估并教育最近出院的诊所患者的SDH需求,并为他们转诊至所需的社区服务。
出院后30天、60天和90天内的再次住院情况每6个月跟踪一次。协变量包括患者年龄、性别、种族/民族、保险状况、收入、分层条件类别风险评分以及临床分类软件诊断组。干预期间所有出院的数据用于主要分析,并提取干预前一年的数据进行比较。
总体而言,干预组患者年龄更大、病情更严重,且更有可能拥有公共保险。干预期间,干预组30天、60天和90天再次住院率的降低分别为14.39%、13.28%和12.04%,而对照组未观察到显著变化。随着时间推移,30天(差异 = 12.54%;p = 0.032)、60天(差异 = 14.40%;p = 0.012)和90天再次住院率的组间差异具有统计学意义(差异 = 14.71%;p = 0.036)。
我们的研究结果表明,在医院后护理期间对诊所患者进行SDH筛查,并对他们进行教育并将其与社区服务联系起来,可能与降低再次住院率有关。