• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同设计谘询患者决策辅助工具,以帮助患有痴呆症的患者继续或停止使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂。

Co-Designing a Consult Patient Decision Aid for Continuation Versus Deprescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors in People Living with Dementia.

机构信息

Pharmacy Australian Centre of Excellence, Health and Behavioural Science Department, School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, 20 Cornwall Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia.

Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2024 Oct;41(10):821-831. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01146-5. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1007/s40266-024-01146-5
PMID:39289289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11480166/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

As dementia progresses, people living with dementia may take high-risk, unnecessary, or ineffective medicines. Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) may have benefit in some people with dementia; however, up to one third are continued when no longer necessary or safe. Our aim was to co-design a consult patient decision aid (CPtDA) to support shared decision making between healthcare professionals and consumers about continuing or deprescribing ChEIs.

METHODS

A systematic process was employed to design and test the CPtDA prototype. First, a steering group composed of healthcare professionals and a consumer representative was assembled. Guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, the steering group defined the CPtDA's purpose, scope, and target audience and drafted the prototype for further testing. Interviews with consumers and healthcare professionals were conducted to gain feedback on the content, format, structure, comprehensibility and usability of the CPtDA prototype.

RESULTS

After the steering group developed the CPtDA prototype, interviews were conducted with 11 consumers and six healthcare professionals. The content and format of the decision aid were improved iteratively over three rounds after consolidating the feedback at each round. The main changes included rewording the purpose of the decision aid and simplifying its layout and format. Participants reported that the decision aid is comprehensible and may be useful in practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited available resources guide shared decision making about deprescribing. This study resulted in a co-designed and alpha-tested CPtDA for people living with dementia and carers to help them review the ongoing need for their ChEIs. Further research is needed to explore using the CPtDA in practice to support people living with dementia and their carers engage in the shared decision-making process about continuing or deprescribing their ChEIs. Our co-designed CPtDA could help people living with dementia and their carers review their goals of care alongside their healthcare professional. This may prompt conversations about appropriately using ChEIs and increase the uptake of deprescribing.

摘要

背景与目的

随着痴呆症的进展,痴呆症患者可能会服用高风险、不必要或无效的药物。胆碱酯酶抑制剂(ChEIs)可能对一些痴呆症患者有益;然而,多达三分之一的患者在不再需要或不安全时仍继续服用。我们的目的是共同设计一种咨询患者决策辅助工具(CPtDA),以支持医疗保健专业人员和消费者就继续或减少 ChEIs 的使用进行共同决策。

方法

采用系统的方法设计和测试 CPtDA 原型。首先,由医疗保健专业人员和消费者代表组成的指导小组成立。在国际患者决策辅助工具标准的指导下,指导小组定义了 CPtDA 的目的、范围和目标受众,并起草了进一步测试的原型。对消费者和医疗保健专业人员进行了访谈,以获取对 CPtDA 原型的内容、格式、结构、可理解性和可用性的反馈。

结果

在指导小组开发了 CPtDA 原型后,对 11 名消费者和 6 名医疗保健专业人员进行了访谈。在每一轮整合反馈后,经过三轮迭代改进了决策辅助工具的内容和格式。主要变化包括重新措辞决策辅助工具的目的,并简化其布局和格式。参与者报告说,决策辅助工具是可理解的,在实践中可能是有用的。

结论

有限的可用资源指导了减少用药的共同决策。本研究产生了一种共同设计和 alpha 测试的 CPtDA,供痴呆症患者及其护理人员使用,以帮助他们审查继续使用 ChEIs 的必要性。需要进一步研究以探索在实践中使用 CPtDA 来支持痴呆症患者及其护理人员参与关于继续或减少使用 ChEIs 的共同决策过程。我们共同设计的 CPtDA 可以帮助痴呆症患者及其护理人员在与医疗保健专业人员一起审查他们的护理目标。这可能会促使他们讨论适当使用 ChEIs,并增加减少用药的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c00/11480166/668589f575f3/40266_2024_1146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c00/11480166/668589f575f3/40266_2024_1146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c00/11480166/668589f575f3/40266_2024_1146_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-Designing a Consult Patient Decision Aid for Continuation Versus Deprescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors in People Living with Dementia.共同设计谘询患者决策辅助工具,以帮助患有痴呆症的患者继续或停止使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Oct;41(10):821-831. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01146-5. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Deprescribing cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in dementia: guideline summary.在痴呆症中停用胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚:指南摘要。
Med J Aust. 2019 Mar;210(4):174-179. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50015. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
3
"Starting to think that way from the start": approaching deprescribing decision-making for people accessing palliative care - a qualitative exploration of healthcare professionals views.“从一开始就那样想”:对接受姑息治疗的人群进行逐渐减药决策——对医疗保健专业人员观点的定性探索。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 6;23(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01523-2.
4
Anticholinergic co-prescribing in nursing home residents using cholinesterase inhibitors: Potential deprescribing cascade.养老院中使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂的患者合用抗胆碱能药物:潜在的停药级联反应。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):77-88. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18066. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
5
Preferences for deprescribing antihypertensive medications amongst clinicians, carers and people living with dementia: a discrete choice experiment.降压药物停药偏好研究:临床医生、护理人员和痴呆症患者的离散选择实验。
Age Ageing. 2023 Aug 1;52(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad153.
6
Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis.针对多病共存和多种药物治疗的老年人减药:TAILOR 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jul;26(32):1-148. doi: 10.3310/AAFO2475.
7
Co-design development of a decision guide on eating and drinking for people with severe dementia during acute hospital admissions.共同设计制定一个针对急性住院期间严重痴呆症患者饮食的决策指南。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):613-629. doi: 10.1111/hex.13672. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
8
Development of consumer information leaflets for deprescribing in older hospital inpatients: a mixed-methods study.为老年住院患者减药开发患者信息传单:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e033303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033303.
9
A decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end-of-life: Coproduction process, outcome and reflections.一种支持痴呆症患者临终阶段家庭照料者的决策辅助工具:共同制作过程、结果与思考。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1677-1691. doi: 10.1111/hex.13307. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
10
Development and user-testing of a digital patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for people with stable angina.开发并测试一款数字化患者决策辅助工具,以促进稳定性心绞痛患者的共同决策。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 27;22(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01882-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Partnering with a stakeholder steering group to co-design the PRIME deprescribing conversation tool: Reflections and recommendations.与利益相关者指导小组合作共同设计PRIME减药对话工具:反思与建议。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024 Jan;134(1):121-125. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13938. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
2
Willingness of older people living with dementia and mild cognitive impairment and their caregivers to have medications deprescribed.患有痴呆症和轻度认知障碍的老年人及其护理人员愿意减少药物剂量。
Age Ageing. 2023 Jan 8;52(1). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac335.
3
Deprescribing Education vs Usual Care for Patients With Cognitive Impairment and Primary Care Clinicians: The OPTIMIZE Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.
认知障碍患者和初级保健临床医生的减药教育与常规护理的比较:OPTIMIZE 实用聚类随机试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 May 1;182(5):534-542. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0502.
4
Development, validation and evaluation of the Goal-directed Medication review Electronic Decision Support System (G-MEDSS)©.制定、验证和评估目标导向的药物审查电子决策支持系统(G-MEDSS)©。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jul;18(7):3174-3183. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
5
Development of Patient Education Material for Proton Pump Inhibitor Deprescribing: A Mixed-Methods Study.质子泵抑制剂减药患者教育材料的开发:一项混合方法研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Jul;56(7):800-808. doi: 10.1177/10600280211046630. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
6
Barriers and enablers of older adults initiating a deprescribing conversation.老年人启动药物减量对话的障碍和促进因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Mar;105(3):615-624. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
7
Development of consumer information leaflets for deprescribing in older hospital inpatients: a mixed-methods study.为老年住院患者减药开发患者信息传单:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):e033303. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033303.
8
GP-Led Deprescribing in Community-Living Older Australians: An Exploratory Controlled Trial.以全科医生为主导的社区居住老年澳大利亚人药物减量:一项探索性对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Feb;68(2):403-410. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16273. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
9
Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care: a systematic review.决策辅助工具在痴呆症护理中的应用:系统评价。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Oct;31(10):1403-1419. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000826.
10
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in people with dementia: An Australian population-based study.痴呆人群中的潜在不适当处方:一项澳大利亚基于人群的研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;34(10):1498-1505. doi: 10.1002/gps.5160. Epub 2019 Jul 3.