Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Centre for Dementia Palliative Care Research, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Oct;31(10):1403-1419. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000826.
We aimed to critically evaluate decision aids developed for practitioners and caregivers when providing care for someone with dementia or for use by people with dementia themselves. Decision aids may be videos, booklets, or web-based tools that explicitly state the decision, provide information about the decision, and summarize options along with associated benefits and harms. This helps guide the decision maker through clarifying the values they place on the benefits or harms of the options.
We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature in electronic databases (CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsychINFO) in March 2018. Reference lists were searched for relevant papers and citations tracked. Data were synthesized with meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. Papers were included if they met the following criteria: 1) the focus of the paper was on the evaluation of a decision aid; 2) the decision aid was used in dementia care; and 3) the decision aid was aimed at professionals, people with dementia, or caregivers.
We identified 3618 studies, and 10 studies were included, covering three topics across six decision aids: 1) support with eating/feeding options, 2) place of care, and 3) goals of care. The mode of delivery and format of the decision aids varied and included paper-based, video-based, and audio-based decision aids. The decision aids were shown to be effective, increasing knowledge and the quality of communication. The meta-analysis demonstrated that decisions are effective in reducing decisional conflict among caregivers (standardized mean difference = -0.50, 95% confidence interval [ - 0.97, - 0.02]).
Decision aids offer a promising approach for providing support for decision-making in dementia care. People are often faced with more than one decision, and decisions are often interrelated. The decision aids identified in this review focus on single topics. There is a need for decision aids that cover multiple topics in one aid to reflect this complexity and better support caregivers.
我们旨在批判性地评估为痴呆症患者的护理人员或患者自身提供护理时使用的决策辅助工具。决策辅助工具可以是视频、手册或基于网络的工具,明确说明决策,提供有关决策的信息,并总结选项以及相关的益处和危害。这有助于指导决策者通过明确他们对选项的益处或危害的重视程度来做出决策。
我们于 2018 年 3 月在电子数据库(CINAHL、The Cochrane Library、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 PsychINFO)中对同行评审文献进行了系统评价。搜索了参考文献列表以获取相关论文,并跟踪了引用。使用荟萃分析和叙述性综合来综合数据。如果符合以下标准,则将论文纳入:1)论文的重点是评估决策辅助工具;2)决策辅助工具用于痴呆症护理;3)决策辅助工具针对专业人员、痴呆症患者或护理人员。
我们确定了 3618 项研究,其中 10 项研究被纳入,涵盖了六个决策辅助工具的三个主题:1)支持饮食/喂养选项,2)护理地点,3)护理目标。决策辅助工具的交付方式和格式各不相同,包括基于纸张、基于视频和基于音频的决策辅助工具。决策辅助工具被证明是有效的,可提高知识水平和沟通质量。荟萃分析表明,决策辅助工具可有效降低护理人员的决策冲突(标准化均数差=-0.50,95%置信区间[-0.97,-0.02])。
决策辅助工具为痴呆症护理中的决策提供支持提供了一种有前途的方法。人们通常面临不止一个决策,并且决策通常相互关联。本综述中确定的决策辅助工具仅关注单个主题。需要一种涵盖多个主题的决策辅助工具,以反映这种复杂性并更好地支持护理人员。