Rocks Madeline C, Comunale Victoria, Sanchez-Navarro Gerardo E, Nicholas Rebecca S, Hacquebord Jacques H, Adler Ronald S
The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
New York University Langone Health, New York City, USA.
Hand (N Y). 2024 Sep 17:15589447241277844. doi: 10.1177/15589447241277844.
The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic capability of ultrasonography (US) in patients with suspected brachial plexus injury (BPI) to the terminal nerves by comparing physical examination (PE) findings with US, electromyography (EMG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports.
All patients at a single institution who underwent US for peripheral nerve injury of the brachial plexus and terminal nerves resulting in sensory-motor deficits from October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2023 were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed. Each PE, US, EMG, and MRI reports were given an overall rating: "normal" or "abnormal." Terminal nerves (musculocutaneous, axillary, radial, ulnar, medial) were individually assessed as "normal" or "abnormal." The interobserver agreement between reports was calculated using Cohen kappa. Specificity and sensitivity analyses were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy and were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
A total of 120 patients were included. Most injuries were traumatic in nature (78.8%) and were low-energy (53.8%). When each imaging modality was compared with the PE findings, EMG had the highest interobserver agreement (Cohen kappa = 0.18), followed by US (Cohen kappa = 0.10), and last MRI (Cohen kappa = 0.07). The US had the highest sensitivity (0.92, CI = 0.85, 0.96) among the 3 imaging modalities (Table 2). On US, the ulnar nerve was most commonly abnormal (n = 84, 70.0%).
Ultrasonography serves as a useful adjunct in the workup of patients with suspected peripheral BPI and is reliable in localizing the pathology of injured terminal nerves in the brachial plexus.
本研究的目的是通过将体格检查(PE)结果与超声(US)、肌电图(EMG)和磁共振成像(MRI)报告进行比较,确定超声检查对疑似臂丛神经损伤(BPI)患者终末神经的诊断能力。
确定2017年10月1日至2023年10月31日在单一机构因臂丛神经和终末神经周围神经损伤导致感觉运动功能障碍而接受超声检查的所有患者。进行回顾性病历审查。每份PE、US、EMG和MRI报告都给出了总体评级:“正常”或“异常”。终末神经(肌皮神经、腋神经、桡神经、尺神经、正中神经)分别评估为“正常”或“异常”。使用Cohen kappa计算报告之间的观察者间一致性。进行特异性和敏感性分析以确定诊断准确性,并报告95%置信区间(CI)。
共纳入120例患者。大多数损伤为创伤性(78.8%)且为低能量损伤(53.8%)。当将每种成像方式与PE结果进行比较时,EMG的观察者间一致性最高(Cohen kappa = 0.18),其次是US(Cohen kappa = 0.10),最后是MRI(Cohen kappa = 0.07)。在三种成像方式中,US的敏感性最高(0.92,CI = 0.85,0.96)(表2)。在超声检查中,尺神经最常出现异常(n = 84,70.0%)。
超声检查是疑似周围性BPI患者检查中的有用辅助手段,在定位臂丛神经损伤终末神经的病变方面可靠。