Rentz Dorene M, Slotkin Jerry, Kaat Aaron J, Young Stephanie Ruth, Dworak Elizabeth M, Shono Yusuke, Adam Hubert, Nowinski Cindy J, Pila Sarah, Novack Miriam A, Hosseinian Zahra, Amagai Saki, Diaz Maria Varela, Almonte-Correa Anyelo, Alperin Keith, Camacho Monica R, Landavazo Bernard, Nosheny Rachel L, Weiner Michael W, Gershon Richard C
Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Center for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
J Neuropsychol. 2024 Sep 17. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12394.
Validation of the Mobile Toolbox Faces and Names associative memory test is presented. Ninety-two participants self-administered Faces and Names in-person; 956 self-administered Faces and Names remotely but took convergent measures in person; and 123 self-administered Faces and Names remotely twice, 14 days apart. Internal consistency (.76-.79) and test-retest reliability (ICC = .73) were acceptable. Convergent validity with WMS-IV Verbal Paired Associates was satisfactory (immediate .54; delayed .58). The findings suggest the remotely administered Faces and Names is a reliable instrument.
本文展示了移动工具箱面孔与名字联想记忆测试的验证情况。92名参与者亲自进行了面孔与名字测试;956名参与者远程进行了面孔与名字测试,但亲自进行了聚合测量;123名参与者相隔14天远程进行了两次面孔与名字测试。内部一致性(0.76 - 0.79)和重测信度(组内相关系数 = 0.73)是可接受的。与韦氏记忆量表第四版言语配对联想测验的聚合效度令人满意(即时效度为0.54;延迟效度为0.58)。研究结果表明,远程进行的面孔与名字测试是一种可靠的工具。