• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿人群中微创与开放肾盂成形术:三级中心的比较性回顾性研究

Minimally invasive versus open pyeloplasty in pediatric population: Comparative retrospective study in tertiary centre.

作者信息

Alqarni Naif Hajar, Alyami Fahad Ali, Alshayie Mohammed Abdullah, Abduldaem Alhasan Mohamed, Sultan Mohammed, Almaiman Sultan Sulaiman, Alsufyani Hazim Mohammed, Abunohaiah Ibrahim Sami

机构信息

Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Pediatric Surgery and Urology Department, Maternity and Children Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2024 Jul-Sep;16(3):215-217. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_101_23. Epub 2024 Jul 3.

DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_101_23
PMID:39290219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11404714/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is the most common cause of antenatal hydronephrosis. The incidence is around 1: 750-1500 live births. The standard treatment for (UPJO) is open pyeloplasty (OP) with a high success rate of 90%-95%. In the last 20 years, minimal invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) became an excellent alternative technique to OP which was historically the standard of care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study participants were male and female patients aged 14 years old or less who had undergone open/minimally invasive pyeloplasty during 2015-2020 and who had at least 1-year follow-up after surgery. The data were collected retrospectively from patients' charts. The patients were categorized into two cohort groups: OP and on the other arm minimally invasive pyeloplasty (robotic/laparoscopic) comparing the outcomes as a 1ry endpoint. 2ry endpoints were hospital stay, duration of surgery, and anteroposterior diameter of renal ultrasound.

RESULTS

A total of 133 patients were included in the study. Eighty-four underwent MIP while 49 patients underwent OP. 1ry endpoint was the success rate in both groups. The success rate was 94% (: 79) and 98% (: 48) in patients who underwent MIP and OP, respectively. <0.05 is considered significant.

CONCLUSION

Open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty are comparable in terms of success rate. However, OP was associated with shorter hospital stays and shorter operative times.

摘要

背景

肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)是产前肾积水最常见的原因。发病率约为1:750 - 1500活产儿。UPJO的标准治疗方法是开放性肾盂成形术(OP),成功率高达90% - 95%。在过去20年中,微创肾盂成形术(MIP)成为OP的一种优秀替代技术,而OP在历史上一直是治疗的标准。

材料与方法

研究参与者为2015年至2020年期间接受开放性/微创肾盂成形术且术后至少有1年随访的14岁及以下男性和女性患者。数据从患者病历中回顾性收集。患者被分为两个队列组:OP组和另一组微创肾盂成形术(机器人/腹腔镜)组,将结果作为主要终点进行比较。次要终点为住院时间、手术时长和肾脏超声前后径。

结果

共有133名患者纳入研究。84例接受MIP,49例接受OP。主要终点是两组的成功率。接受MIP和OP的患者成功率分别为94%(:79)和98%(:48)。<0.05被认为具有显著性。

结论

开放性和微创肾盂成形术在成功率方面具有可比性。然而,OP与更短的住院时间和更短的手术时间相关。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive versus open pyeloplasty in pediatric population: Comparative retrospective study in tertiary centre.小儿人群中微创与开放肾盂成形术:三级中心的比较性回顾性研究
Urol Ann. 2024 Jul-Sep;16(3):215-217. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_101_23. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
2
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术治疗儿童复发性输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻的比较
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):401.e1-401.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?儿童肾盂成形术失败:机器人辅助腹腔镜再次修复是否可行?
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):69.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.009. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
4
Comparison between open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty in infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.开放与微创肾盂成形术治疗婴儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Apr;20(2):244-252. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.11.017. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
5
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: Open or minimally invasive surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.婴儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:开放手术还是微创手术?一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 23;10:1052440. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1052440. eCollection 2022.
6
Minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术治疗婴儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 20;11:e16468. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16468. eCollection 2023.
7
Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO).多中心比较研究:开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Nov-Dec;48(6):961-968. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0194.
8
Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?小儿机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术(RALP):体重有影响吗?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Mar;35(3):391-396. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04435-y. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
9
Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database.开放手术与微创肾盂成形术治疗输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的成人患者30天围手术期结局比较:对前瞻性全国数据库中593例患者的分析
World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):2107-13. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1586-4. Epub 2015 May 13.
10
Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.全球儿童微创肾盂成形术研究:欧洲泌尿外科学会青年学术泌尿外科医生工作组小儿泌尿外科专家组的结果
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12(4):229.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves.腹腔镜和机器人肾盂成形术作为微创替代开放手术治疗婴儿输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻:多机构结局和学习曲线比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Apr;40(4):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03929-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
2
Comparison between mini-laparoscopy, conventional laparoscopy and open approach for ureteropelvic junction obstruction treatment in children.小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻治疗中小切口腹腔镜、传统腹腔镜与开放手术的比较。
Scand J Urol. 2021 Aug;55(4):307-312. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1948098. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Resolution of hydronephrosis after pyeloplasty in children.儿童肾盂成形术后肾积水的消退
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Feb;17(1):102.e1-102.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.10.031. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
Surgical outcomes are equivalent after pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.对于肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻,单纯腹腔镜肾盂成形术和机器人辅助肾盂成形术后的手术效果相当。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Dec;16(6):845.e1-845.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
5
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗儿童肾盂积水:系统评价。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Dec;72(6):673-690. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03854-0. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children with complex pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): results of a multicenter European report.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术(RALP)治疗儿童复杂性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(PUJO):一项多中心欧洲报告的结果。
World J Urol. 2021 May;39(5):1641-1647. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03331-8. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
7
Learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children: how to reach a level of excellence?机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术(RALP)在儿童中的学习曲线:如何达到卓越水平?
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):93-97. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01082-7. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction - a systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的手术方法 - 系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0544-7.
9
Minilaparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty in Children Less Than 1 Year.1岁以下儿童的迷你腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术对比
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jul;29(7):970-975. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0586. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
Laparoscopic vs Open Pyeloplasty in Children: Results of a Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial.儿童腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术:一项随机、前瞻性、对照试验的结果
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):792-797. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.056. Epub 2016 Oct 17.