• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理决策工具的文化适应及葡萄牙语欧洲版心理测量学评估

Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese.

作者信息

Paiva Ivo Cristiano Soares, Neves Teresa Margarida Almeida, Ventura Filipa Isabel Quaresma Santos, Vilela António Carlos Lopes, Moreira Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges

机构信息

ICBAS - School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University; Nursing School of Coimbra; Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Nursing School of Coimbra, Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Sep 10;10:23779608241278611. doi: 10.1177/23779608241278611. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/23779608241278611
PMID:39290448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406578/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nurses are continually faced with multiple demands to make decisions in their clinical practice. The Nursing Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI) assesses nurses' decision-making styles during the several stages of this process.

OBJECTIVES

To adapt the NDMI into European Portuguese and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version in a population of Portuguese nurses.

METHODS

Descriptive study design was used to examine psychometric properties of NDMI. Nonprobability convenience sample of 339 Portuguese direct-care nurses. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising sociodemographic and professional data and the NDMI-Portuguese version (NDMI-PT). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA; = 125) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; = 214) were carried out using IBM SPSS (v. 24) and AMOS (v. 22).

RESULTS

The EFA revealed a structure of four latent factors, which represent the reorganized stages of the decision-making process. The CFA found a good overall fit of the model (χ/df = 2.13; comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.91; goodness of fit index [GFI] = 0.82; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.90; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07; maximum-likelihood expected cross-validation index [MECVI] = 3.13). The psychometric analysis of the theoretical structure revealed that the four factors reflect the decision-making stages and have a better overall fit than the empirical structure (χ/df = 1.82; CFI = 0.94; GFI = 0.86; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.06; MECVI = 2.55). The analysis of the construct reliability of the NDMI-PT revealed that the overall internal consistency was excellent (=0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the empirical and theoretical structures were appropriate and valid for the sample under analysis. The NDMI-PT is a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses' decision-making styles. Studies should be conducted to gain further insight into the robustness of this validated tool.

摘要

引言

护士在临床实践中不断面临着做出决策的多重要求。护理决策工具(NDMI)评估护士在这一过程的几个阶段中的决策风格。

目的

将NDMI改编为欧洲葡萄牙语版本,并评估葡萄牙语版本在葡萄牙护士群体中的心理测量特性。

方法

采用描述性研究设计来检验NDMI的心理测量特性。对339名葡萄牙直接护理护士进行非概率便利抽样。使用一份包含社会人口学和专业数据以及NDMI葡萄牙语版本(NDMI-PT)的问卷收集数据。使用IBM SPSS(v. 24)和AMOS(v. 22)进行探索性因素分析(EFA;n = 125)和验证性因素分析(CFA;n = 214)。

结果

探索性因素分析揭示了四个潜在因素的结构,这四个潜在因素代表了决策过程的重新组织阶段。验证性因素分析发现模型整体拟合良好(χ/df = 2.13;比较拟合指数[CFI] = 0.91;拟合优度指数[GFI] = 0.82;塔克-刘易斯指数[TLI] = 0.90;近似误差均方根[RMSEA] = 0.07;最大似然期望交叉验证指数[MECVI] = 3.13)。对理论结构的心理测量分析表明,这四个因素反映了决策阶段,并且比实证结构具有更好的整体拟合度(χ/df = 1.82;CFI = 0.94;GFI = 0.86;TLI = 0.93;RMSEA = 0.06;MECVI = 2.55)。对NDMI-PT的结构可靠性分析表明,总体内部一致性极佳(α = 0.96)。

结论

本研究表明,实证结构和理论结构对于所分析的样本是合适且有效的。NDMI-PT是评估护士决策风格的可靠且有效的工具。应开展研究以进一步深入了解这一经过验证工具的稳健性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af92/11406578/6d9011480e25/10.1177_23779608241278611-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af92/11406578/61854d999064/10.1177_23779608241278611-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af92/11406578/6d9011480e25/10.1177_23779608241278611-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af92/11406578/61854d999064/10.1177_23779608241278611-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af92/11406578/6d9011480e25/10.1177_23779608241278611-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese.护理决策工具的文化适应及葡萄牙语欧洲版心理测量学评估
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Sep 10;10:23779608241278611. doi: 10.1177/23779608241278611. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale.《护理临床决策量表波斯语版本的跨文化适应与心理测量学评估》
J Nurs Meas. 2021 Dec 1;29(3):391-407. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-20-00052. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Initial psychometric properties of an Arabic version of the disordered eating attitudes in pregnancy scale (A-DEAPS) among Lebanese pregnant women.黎巴嫩孕妇中阿拉伯语版孕期饮食态度紊乱量表(A-DEAPS)的初始心理测量学特性。
J Eat Disord. 2022 Nov 21;10(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00710-x.
4
Translation and psychometric testing of the Persian Version of nurses' ethical decision-making in End-of-Life Care Scale.《临终关怀护士伦理决策量表》波斯语版本的翻译及心理测量测试
BMC Nurs. 2024 May 8;23(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01981-2.
5
Further evidence of validity of the Nursing Decision Making Instrument: an Italian validation study.护理决策工具效度的进一步证据:一项意大利验证研究。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Dec 21;92(S2):e2021331. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11773.
6
Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the role-modeling cost-conscious behaviors scale.翻译、跨文化调适和验证榜样成本意识行为量表。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 16;19(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1587-x.
7
Translation and Validation of the Individual Workload Perception Scale-Revised for Portuguese Nurses.葡萄牙护士个体工作量感知量表修订版的翻译与验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 7;10(12):2476. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122476.
8
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the career competencies questionnaire for nurses: a cross-sectional study.护士职业能力问卷日文版的心理测量学特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Sep 27;21(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01035-5.
9
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of Brazilian Portuguese version of the 14-item Health Literacy Scale.14 项健康素养量表巴西葡萄牙语版的翻译、跨文化调适及心理计量学评估。
Cien Saude Colet. 2020 Jul 8;25(7):2847-2857. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020257.22282018.
10
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Multidimensional Scale of Dating Violence 2.0 in Young University Students.《多维约会暴力量表2.0葡萄牙语版本在青年大学生中的跨文化适应与验证》
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 30;12(7):759. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070759.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurses' personality traits and decision-making as factors related to missed nursing care: a structural equation modeling approach.护士的人格特质与决策作为与护理缺失相关的因素:一种结构方程建模方法。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 23;24(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03632-6.

本文引用的文献

1
A Concept Analysis of Nurses' Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Korea.护士临床决策的概念分析:对韩国的启示
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;19(6):3596. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063596.
2
Further evidence of validity of the Nursing Decision Making Instrument: an Italian validation study.护理决策工具效度的进一步证据:一项意大利验证研究。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Dec 21;92(S2):e2021331. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11773.
3
Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS-PT©) in nursing students: translation and validation.
临床护理决策量表(CDMNS-PT©)在护理学生中的应用:翻译与验证。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Sep 1;74(suppl 6):e20210032. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0032. eCollection 2021.
4
[Decision Making process and missed nursing care: findings from a scoping review].[决策过程与护理缺失:一项范围综述的结果]
Assist Inferm Ric. 2020 Oct-Dec;39(4):188-200. doi: 10.1702/3508.34952.
5
The Influence of Self-Concept on Clinical Decision-Making in Nurses and Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.自我概念对护士和护理学生临床决策的影响:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;17(9):3059. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093059.
6
Understanding how nurses ration care.
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 May 21;32(3):494-510. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2017-0248. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
7
Decision-making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review.护理实践中的决策:综合文献回顾。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Mar;27(5-6):917-928. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14151. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
8
Benner's Framework and Clinical Decision-Making in the Critical Care Environment.本纳的框架与重症监护环境中的临床决策
Nurs Sci Q. 2017 Jan;30(1):52-57. doi: 10.1177/0894318416680536.
9
Quality of nursing care: instrument development and validation.护理质量:量表的开发与验证
Rev Bras Enferm. 2016 Sep-Oct;69(5):920-926. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2015-0151.
10
Decision Making in Nursing Practice: A Concept Analysis.护理实践中的决策:概念分析
Nurs Forum. 2016 Jan-Mar;51(1):40-8. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12119. Epub 2015 Feb 2.