• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学重症监护病房中各种弥散性血管内凝血评分与序贯器官衰竭评估评分的研究

Study of Various Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Scores and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Medical Intensive Care Unit.

作者信息

Mahashabde Madhulika L, Sriram Jugal

机构信息

General Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Aug 18;16(8):e67134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67134. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.67134
PMID:39290912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11407786/
Abstract

Aim The aim of the present study was to assess the disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and its correlation with DIC scores (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC)) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in medical intensive care unit (MICU) patients. Methods The study was conducted at the medical intensive care unit at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College and Hospital, D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune spanning from October 2020 to September 2022. A total of 100 patients admitted to the hospital ICU satisfying qSOFA score were included in the current study. Approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee before commencing the study. All patients and their family members included in the study were provided with a detailed explanation of the study. Clinical history of illness and physical examination were done in detail. The laboratory values were obtained and were calculated with the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Results The average age of the study population was 52.08 ± 16.44 years. Within the study population, 65% were male and 35% were female. Within the group being studied, the average pulse rate was 66.64 ± 17.33 beats per minute, the average systolic blood pressure was 83.7 ± 11.38 mm Hg, the average diastolic blood pressure was 59.7 ± 10.49 mm Hg, and the average respiratory rate was 38.4 ± 4.8. The average Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) among the participants was 9.51 ± 1.74. The average qSOFA score across the study participants was 2.58 ± 0.6. The study population consisted of 60% survivors and 40% non-survivors. Regarding the study population, 57.15% of individuals experienced mortality as a result of DIC. The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in the mean ISTH score between the result groups at 48 hours. The disparity in the average SOFA score at admission, 24 hours, 48 hours, day 7 and day 14 between the outcomes (survivors and non-survivors) was statistically significant. Conclusion This research suggests that there is a positive link between higher scores on the estimated ISTH, SIC and SOFA scales. The prognosis of critically sick patients is negatively correlated with the progressive increase in DIC scores throughout follow-up, while a stable or declining DIC score is indicative of a more favorable prognosis. There was no significant link seen between non-overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) mortality and DIC scores.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估医学重症监护病房(MICU)患者的弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)及其与DIC评分(国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)、脓毒症诱导的凝血病(SIC))和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的相关性。方法 本研究在位于浦那市平普里的迪帕克·帕蒂尔医学学院和医院的医学重症监护病房进行,时间跨度为2020年10月至2022年9月。共有100名入住医院ICU且满足qSOFA评分的患者纳入本研究。在开始研究前获得了机构伦理委员会的批准。纳入研究的所有患者及其家属均得到了关于本研究的详细解释。详细记录了疾病的临床病史和体格检查情况。获取了实验室检查值,并计算了国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)、脓毒症诱导的凝血病(SIC)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。结果 研究人群的平均年龄为52.08±16.44岁。在研究人群中,65%为男性,35%为女性。在被研究组中,平均脉搏率为66.64±17.33次/分钟,平均收缩压为83.7±11.38毫米汞柱,平均舒张压为59.7±10.49毫米汞柱,平均呼吸频率为38.4±4.8。参与者的平均格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为9.51±1.74。整个研究参与者的平均qSOFA评分为2.58±0.6。研究人群中60%为幸存者,40%为非幸存者。在研究人群中,57.15%的个体因DIC死亡。统计分析显示,48小时时结果组之间的平均ISTH评分存在显著差异。在入院时、24小时、48小时、第7天和第14天,结局(幸存者和非幸存者)之间的平均SOFA评分差异具有统计学意义。结论 本研究表明,估计的ISTH、SIC和SOFA量表得分越高之间存在正相关。危重病患者的预后与随访期间DIC评分的逐渐升高呈负相关,而DIC评分稳定或下降则表明预后更有利。未观察到非显性弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)死亡率与DIC评分之间存在显著关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e74/11407786/1c04d0cf9708/cureus-0016-00000067134-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e74/11407786/1c04d0cf9708/cureus-0016-00000067134-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e74/11407786/1c04d0cf9708/cureus-0016-00000067134-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Study of Various Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Scores and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Medical Intensive Care Unit.医学重症监护病房中各种弥散性血管内凝血评分与序贯器官衰竭评估评分的研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 18;16(8):e67134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67134. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Comparison of a new criteria for sepsis-induced coagulopathy and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis disseminated intravascular coagulation score in critically ill patients with sepsis 3.0: a retrospective study.脓毒症诱导的凝血病新诊断标准与国际血栓与止血协会弥散性血管内凝血评分在脓毒症3.0重症患者中的比较:一项回顾性研究
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2018 Sep;29(6):551-558. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000755.
3
[Antithrombin III for early diagnosis of DIC in sepsis patients: a retrospective analysis with 445 patients].抗凝血酶III用于脓毒症患者弥散性血管内凝血的早期诊断:445例患者的回顾性分析
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):127-132. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.007.
4
The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria in intensive care units.重症监护病房中的国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)标准。
J Vasc Nurs. 2023 Dec;41(4):158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Prospective comparison of new Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) DIC and International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) DIC score in critically ill septic patients.新日本急救医学协会(JAAM)弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)评分与国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)DIC 评分在危重症脓毒症患者中的前瞻性比较。
Thromb Res. 2012 Apr;129(4):e119-25. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.11.017. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
6
Diagnostic and prognostic value of Sepsis-Induced coagulopathy and International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis scoring systems in COVID-19-associated disseminated intravascular coagulopathy.脓毒症诱导的凝血病及国际血栓与止血协会评分系统在新型冠状病毒肺炎相关弥散性血管内凝血中的诊断和预后价值
J Res Med Sci. 2021 Oct 18;26:102. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1295_20. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison of Three Different Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) Criteria and Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Antithrombin Investigation in Patients with Confirmed Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC).比较三种不同的弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)标准与确诊脓毒症诱导性凝血功能障碍(SIC)患者抗凝血酶研究的诊断和预后价值。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241271334. doi: 10.1177/10760296241271334.
8
Prognostic Accuracy of the Different Scoring Systems for Assessing Coagulopathy in Sepsis: A Retrospective Study.不同评分系统评估脓毒症凝血障碍的预后准确性:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231207630. doi: 10.1177/10760296231207630.
9
Newly Proposed Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy Precedes International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Overt-Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation and Predicts High Mortality.新提出的脓毒症诱导性凝血病先于国际血栓与止血学会弥漫性血管内凝血,并预测高死亡率。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):643-649. doi: 10.1177/0885066618773679. Epub 2018 May 2.
10
Performances of disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring systems in septic shock patients.弥散性血管内凝血评分系统在脓毒性休克患者中的表现。
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jul 10;10(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00704-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Navigating the Complexity of Scoring Systems in Sepsis Management: A Comprehensive Review.脓毒症管理中评分系统的复杂性剖析:全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Feb 11;16(2):e54030. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54030. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Risk stratification utilizing sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, antithrombin activity, and demographic data in sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).利用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、抗凝血酶活性和人口统计学数据对脓毒症相关弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)进行风险分层。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 15;13(1):22502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49855-y.
3
The pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation.
脓毒症相关弥散性血管内凝血的病理生理学、诊断及管理
J Intensive Care. 2023 May 23;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00672-5.
4
Temporal Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Hospitalizations With Sepsis.脓毒症住院患者中弥散性血管内凝血的时间趋势、预测因素及结局
Cureus. 2022 Jul 30;14(7):e27477. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27477. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
SOFA Score in relation to Sepsis: Clinical Implications in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostic Assessment.SOFA 评分与脓毒症:在诊断、治疗和预后评估中的临床意义。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 10;2022:7870434. doi: 10.1155/2022/7870434. eCollection 2022.
6
The Effect of Heparin and Its Preparations on Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Mortality and Hospitalization: A Systematic Review.肝素及其制剂对弥散性血管内凝血死亡率和住院率的影响:系统评价。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Jul 9;2022:2226761. doi: 10.1155/2022/2226761. eCollection 2022.
7
SURvival PRediction In SEverely Ill Patients Study-The Prediction of Survival in Critically Ill Patients by ICU Physicians.重症患者生存预测研究——重症监护病房医生对危重症患者生存情况的预测
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jan 11;3(1):e0317. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000317. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
Endothelial Responses in Sepsis.脓毒症中的内皮反应。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 1;202(3):361-370. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201910-1911TR.
9
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein in Acute Inflammation.红细胞沉降率和 C 反应蛋白在急性炎症中的应用。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Jan 1;153(1):14-29. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz142.
10
Proposal of a two-step process for the diagnosis of sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation.脓毒症诱导的弥散性血管内凝血诊断两步法的提议。
J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Aug;17(8):1265-1268. doi: 10.1111/jth.14482. Epub 2019 Jun 5.