• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症患者生存预测研究——重症监护病房医生对危重症患者生存情况的预测

SURvival PRediction In SEverely Ill Patients Study-The Prediction of Survival in Critically Ill Patients by ICU Physicians.

作者信息

Ros Marijke M, van der Zaag-Loonen Hester J, Hofhuis José G M, Spronk Peter E

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology, Expertise Center for Intensive care Rehabilitation Apeldoorn (ExpIRA), Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jan 11;3(1):e0317. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000317. eCollection 2021 Jan.

DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000317
PMID:33458684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7803926/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The surprise question, "Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?" is a tool to identify patients at high risk of death in the next year. Especially in the situation of an ICU admission, it is important to recognize patients who could and could not have the benefits of an intensive treatment in the ICU department.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A single-center, prospective, observational cohort study was conducted between April 2013 and April 2018, in ICU Gelre hospitals, location Apeldoorn.

PATIENTS

A total of 3,140 patients were included (57% male) with a mean age of 63.5 years. Seven-hundred thirteen patients (23%) died within 1 year.

INTERVENTIONS

The physician answered three different surprise question's with either "yes" or "no": "I expect that the patient is going to survive the ICU admission" (surprise question 1), "I expect that the patient is going to survive the hospital stay" (surprise question 2), and "I expect that the patient is going to survive one year after ICU admission" (surprise question 3). We tested positive and negative predicted values of the surprise questions, the mean accuracy of the surprise questions, and kappa statistics.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The positive and negative predictive values of the surprise questions for ICU admission, hospital admission, and 1-year survival were, respectively, 64%/94%, 59%/92%, and 60%/86%. Accordingly, the mean accuracy and kappa statistics were 93% (95% CI, 92-94%), κ equals to 0.43, 89% (95% CI, 88-90%), κ equals to 0.40, and 81% (95% CI, 80-82%), κ equals to 0.43.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequently overlooked simple and cheap surprise question is probably an useful tool to evaluate the prognosis of acutely admitted critically ill patients.

摘要

未标注

“如果该患者在未来12个月内死亡,我会感到惊讶吗?”这个出人意料的问题是一种识别未来一年内死亡高风险患者的工具。特别是在重症监护病房(ICU)收治的情况下,识别哪些患者能够从ICU的强化治疗中获益以及哪些患者不能获益非常重要。

设计与背景

2013年4月至2018年4月在阿珀尔多恩的盖尔雷医院ICU进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究。

患者

共纳入3140例患者(57%为男性),平均年龄63.5岁。713例患者(23%)在1年内死亡。

干预措施

医生对三个不同的出人意料的问题回答“是”或“否”:“我预计该患者将在ICU治疗后存活”(出人意料的问题1),“我预计该患者将在住院期间存活”(出人意料的问题2),以及“我预计该患者将在ICU治疗后存活一年”(出人意料的问题3)。我们测试了出人意料的问题的阳性和阴性预测值、出人意料的问题的平均准确率以及kappa统计量。

测量与主要结果

出人意料的问题对ICU收治、住院和1年生存率的阳性和阴性预测值分别为64%/94%、59%/92%和60%/86%。相应地,平均准确率和kappa统计量分别为93%(95%CI,92 - 94%),κ等于0.43;89%(95%CI,88 - 90%),κ等于0.40;81%(95%CI,80 - 82%),κ等于0.43。

结论

这个经常被忽视的简单且廉价的出人意料的问题可能是评估急性收治的危重症患者预后的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58d/7803926/1d0a0d34cbb4/cc9-3-e0317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58d/7803926/9e33534ee454/cc9-3-e0317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58d/7803926/1d0a0d34cbb4/cc9-3-e0317-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58d/7803926/9e33534ee454/cc9-3-e0317-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c58d/7803926/1d0a0d34cbb4/cc9-3-e0317-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
SURvival PRediction In SEverely Ill Patients Study-The Prediction of Survival in Critically Ill Patients by ICU Physicians.重症患者生存预测研究——重症监护病房医生对危重症患者生存情况的预测
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jan 11;3(1):e0317. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000317. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
Association of Emergency Clinicians' Assessment of Mortality Risk With Actual 1-Month Mortality Among Older Adults Admitted to the Hospital.急诊医生评估死亡率与老年住院患者 1 个月实际死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911139. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11139.
3
Usability of the surprise question by nurses to identify 12-month mortality in hospitalized older patients: A prospective cohort study.护士使用惊讶问题识别住院老年患者 12 个月死亡率的可用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103609. Epub 2020 May 29.
4
Observational study of agreement between attending and trainee physicians on the surprise question: "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?".观察性研究:在“如果这个患者在接下来的 12 个月内去世,你会感到惊讶吗?”这个问题上,主治医生和住院医师之间的一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247571. eCollection 2021.
5
Surprise Questions for Survival Prediction in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.晚期癌症患者生存预测的意外问题:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Oncologist. 2015 Jul;20(7):839-44. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0015. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
6
"The surprise questions" using variable time frames in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.在晚期癌症住院患者中使用可变时间框架的“突发问题”
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Apr;20(2):221-225. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000766.
7
Discriminative Accuracy of Physician and Nurse Predictions for Survival and Functional Outcomes 6 Months After an ICU Admission.重症监护病房(ICU)入院6个月后医生和护士对生存及功能转归预测的判别准确性
JAMA. 2017 Jun 6;317(21):2187-2195. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4078.
8
Prognostic value of a modified surprise question designed for use in the emergency department setting.一种专为急诊科设计的改良型意外问题的预后价值。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;6(1):70-76. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.293. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
9
The Value of the Surprise Question to Predict One-Year Mortality in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.《疑问问题对特发性肺纤维化一年死亡率预测的价值:一项前瞻性队列研究》
Respiration. 2021;100(8):780-785. doi: 10.1159/000516291. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
The Surprise Question as a Trigger for Primary Palliative Care Interventions for Children with Advanced Heart Disease.惊喜问题作为触发因素,用于对患有晚期心脏病的儿童进行初级姑息治疗干预。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Dec;43(8):1822-1831. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02919-8. Epub 2022 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Study of Various Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Scores and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Medical Intensive Care Unit.医学重症监护病房中各种弥散性血管内凝血评分与序贯器官衰竭评估评分的研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 18;16(8):e67134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67134. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.意外问题与临床医生预测的预后:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.
3
Examining how goals of care communication are conducted between doctors and patients with severe acute illness in hospital settings: A realist systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Would You Be Surprised if This Patient Died in the Next 12 Months? Using the Surprise Question to Increase Palliative Care Consults From the Emergency Department.如果这位患者在接下来的 12 个月内去世,你会感到惊讶吗?使用惊讶问题来增加急诊科的姑息治疗咨询。
J Palliat Care. 2020 Oct;35(4):221-225. doi: 10.1177/0825859719866698. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
2
Prognostic value of a modified surprise question designed for use in the emergency department setting.一种专为急诊科设计的改良型意外问题的预后价值。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;6(1):70-76. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.293. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
Predictors of death in an Intensive Care Unit: contribution to the palliative approach.
在医院环境中考察医生和患有严重急性病的患者之间如何进行照护目标沟通:一个现实主义的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 18;19(3):e0299933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299933. eCollection 2024.
4
Development of a population-level prediction model for intensive care unit (ICU) survivorship and mortality in older adults: A population-based cohort study.老年人群重症监护病房(ICU)生存和死亡的人群水平预测模型的开发:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 19;6(10):e1634. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1634. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Goals of Care for Patients with Severe Comorbid Illnesses Hospitalized for an Acute Deterioration.因急性病情恶化而住院的重症合并症患者的护理目标。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Summer;26(4):414-415. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24193.
6
The Surprise Question as a Trigger for Primary Palliative Care Interventions for Children with Advanced Heart Disease.惊喜问题作为触发因素,用于对患有晚期心脏病的儿童进行初级姑息治疗干预。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Dec;43(8):1822-1831. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02919-8. Epub 2022 May 3.
7
Ethical Lessons from an Intensivist's Perspective.从重症监护医生视角看伦理教训
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):1613. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061613.
重症监护病房中的死亡预测因素:对姑息治疗方法的贡献。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018 Jun 25;52:e03342. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2017023203342.
4
The "Surprise Question" Asked of Emergency Physicians May Predict 12-Month Mortality among Older Emergency Department Patients.急诊医生被问及的“意外问题”可能预测老年急诊科患者的 12 个月死亡率。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;21(2):236-240. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0192. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
5
How accurate is the 'Surprise Question' at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.“意外问题”在识别临终患者方面的准确性如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2017 Aug 2;15(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0907-4.
6
Derivation and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict 6-Month Mortality in an Intensive Care Unit Population.一种预测 ICU 人群 6 个月死亡率的预后模型的推导和验证。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(10):1556-1561. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201702-159OC.
7
The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测重症患者死亡的“意外问题”:系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2017 Apr 3;189(13):E484-E493. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160775.
8
Data Resource Profile: the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) Registry of Admissions to Adult Intensive Care Units.数据资源简介:荷兰成人重症监护病房入院情况国家重症监护评估(NICE)登记处
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;44(6):1850-1850h. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv291. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
9
Comparison of physician prediction with 2 prognostic scoring systems in predicting 2-year mortality after intensive care admission: a linked-data cohort study.比较医师预测与 2 种预后评分系统在预测重症监护病房入住后 2 年死亡率中的作用:一项基于关联数据的队列研究。
J Crit Care. 2012 Aug;27(4):423.e9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.11.013. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
10
Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians.欧洲和以色列重症监护病房护士和医生对护理适宜性的看法。
JAMA. 2011 Dec 28;306(24):2694-703. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1888.