Suppr超能文献

同义反复解释了没有变异和选择的进化。评戈尔巴(Gabora)的《没有变异和选择的进化过程》(2021)

Tautology explains evolution without variation and selection. A Comment on: 'An evolutionary process without variation and selection' (2021), by Gabora .

机构信息

HUN-REN Institute of Evolution, Centre for Ecological Research, Konkoly-Thege Miklós út 29-33, H-1121 , Budapest, Hungary.

Department of Plant Systematics, Ecology and Theoretical Biology, Biology Institute, ELTE University, Pázmány P. sétány 1/C , Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

J R Soc Interface. 2024 Sep;21(218):20230579. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0579. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

Abstract

Gabora and Steel (Gabora L, Steel M. 2021 An evolutionary process without variation and selection. 18, 20210334. [doi:10.1098/rsif.2021.0334]) claim that cumulative adaptive evolution is possible without natural selection, that is, without variation and competition. To support this claim, the authors modelled a theoretical process called self-other reorganization (SOR) that envisages a population of reflexively autocatalytic sets that can accumulate beneficial changes without any form of birth, death or selection, that is without population dynamics. The authors claim that despite being non-Darwinian, adaptive evolution happens in SOR, deeming it relevant to the origin of life and to cultural evolution. We analysed SOR and the claim that it implements evolution without variation and selection. We found that the authors, by design, ignore the growth and/or degradation of autocatalytic sets or their components, assuming all effects are beneficial and all entities in SOR are identical and immutable. We prove that due to these assumptions, SOR is a trivial model of horizontal percolation of beneficial effects over a static population. We implemented an extended model of SOR including more realistic assumptions to prove that accounting for any of the ignored processes inevitably leads to conventional Darwinian dynamics. Our analysis directly challenges the authors' claims, revealing evidence of an overly fragile foundation. While the best-case scenario the authors incorrectly generalize from may be mathematically valid, stripping away their unrealistic assumptions reveals that SOR does not represent real entities (e.g. protocells) but rather models the triviality that fast horizontal diffusion of effects can effectively equalize a population. Adaptation in SOR is solely because the authors only consider beneficial effects. The omission of death/growth dynamics and maladaptive effects renders SOR unrealistic and its relevance to evolution, cultural or biological, questionable.

摘要

加博拉和斯蒂尔(Gabora L, Steel M. 2021 年,无变异和选择的进化过程。18, 20210334. [doi:10.1098/rsif.2021.0334])声称,累积适应进化是可能的,无需自然选择,也就是说,无需变异和竞争。为了支持这一说法,作者构建了一个名为自我-他者重组(SOR)的理论模型,该模型设想了一个由反射性自催化集组成的种群,这些集可以在没有任何形式的诞生、死亡或选择(即没有种群动态)的情况下积累有益的变化。作者声称,尽管是非达尔文主义的,但 SOR 中发生了适应性进化,认为它与生命起源和文化进化有关。我们分析了 SOR 以及声称它无需变异和选择就能实现进化的说法。我们发现,作者有意忽略了自催化集或其组成部分的增长和/或降解,假设所有影响都是有益的,并且 SOR 中的所有实体都是相同的且不可改变的。我们证明,由于这些假设,SOR 是一个有益效果在静态种群中水平渗透的简单模型。我们实现了一个扩展的 SOR 模型,其中包括更现实的假设,以证明忽略任何忽略的过程必然会导致传统的达尔文动态。我们的分析直接挑战了作者的说法,揭示了一个过于脆弱的基础的证据。虽然作者从错误概括的最佳情况在数学上可能是有效的,但去掉他们不切实际的假设表明,SOR 并不代表实际的实体(例如原细胞),而是模型了快速水平扩散的效果可以有效地使种群均匀化的简单性。SOR 中的适应仅因为作者只考虑有益的影响。忽略死亡/增长动态和不适应效应使 SOR 不切实际,并且其对进化、文化或生物学的相关性值得怀疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94a6/11463229/76fced047f35/rsif.2023.0579.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验